Dispute Resolution and Basic Civil Procedure
Adversarial System (Common Law System)
Adjudicative process
Law applied by precedent
Judge serves as referee
Applies principles of evidence
Parties must bring evidence to court
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Arbitration
Often by contract
Binding on parties
Mediation
Mandatory in North Carolina Superior Court
High rate of success (estimated 90%)
Helps to frame the scope of dispute even if no settlement
Landowner v. Landowner
One private party claims damage from actions of a similar neighbor
Examples: odor or noise nuisance, water damage
Landowner v. Industrial Facility
One private party claims damage from actions of an industrial facility
Common law actions (nuisance, trespass, negligence) and “Citizen Suit” provisions of pollution statutes (e.g. Clean Water Act)
Private Party v. Government
Private individual or organization sues government agency
To force agency to perform duties required by statute
Generally, a refusal of agency to regulate or promulgate a regulation to control pollution
Example: Massachusetts v. EPA
To stop agency from exceeding their authority under a statute
Agency has misinterpreted the law
Source of right to sue
Citizen suit provision of a statute (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act
Suit provision in a procedural statute: Administrative Procedures Act, NEPA, Endangered Species Act, etc.
Limitation on right to sue:
Must meet threshold issues (standing, mootness)
Must exhaust administrative remedies with agency before going to court (when process is required by statute or regulation)
Government v. Private Party
Private party has refused to comply with agency enforcement jurisdiction (authority granted by statute)
Filed as a criminal case by federal or state prosecutor
Example: Rapanos v. U.S.
Plaintiff (aka Petitioner)
shorthand π
Files a complaint, alleges a wrong against specific party, demands relief
Must prove by a preponderance of the evidence
Defendant (aka Respondent)
Shorthand ∆
Alleged to have infringed upon the rights of π
files counterclaim if also injured
Intervenor
Has an interest in the property or right at issue in the litigation
Bound by outcome of case
Amicus Curiae (“Friend of the Court”) (plural: amici curiae)
Seeks to influence decision
Does not wish to become party bound by outcome
Files Amicus Brief in Appellate proceedings only
Example: American Farm Bureau, amicus brief in WOTUS cases
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
28 U.S.C.
Rules of Practice and Procedure for Federal District Court (published by the court)
Special rules for Bankruptcy Court according to Federal District
North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure
N.C.G.S. §1A-1
Agency Appeals Process (Administrative court)
Statutory process for appealing agency action
Denial of permit or levy of fine
Civil Trial
Completion of proper service on Defendant
Distinguish from filing the complaint
Criminal
Grand Jury system (relaxed rules of evidence)
Subject matter jurisdiction (often by statute)
Court may dismiss case without motion from defendant
In Personam – jurisdiction over the person
Minimum contacts rule
Corporate registration requirement (NC Secretary of State)
In Rem – jurisdiction over property (location of property)
Property tax example
Diversity jurisdiction (Federal Court) (28 U.S.C §1332)
ALL civil matters including state law
$75,000 amount in controversy, AND
Plaintiff and Defendant are in different states
Cannot create Federal jurisdiction by contract
Amount in controversy
State court amounts review ($25,000 limit for NC Superior)
Based on locality of dispute
“a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated” (28 U.S. Code §1391(b)(2))
Can be based on residency of defendant
“any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action” (28 U.S. Code §1391(b)(3))
“Convenient to parties and witnesses”
Can be raised pre-trial to change courts (not dismissal of claim)
Litigation tactic by Defendant to increase costs to Plaintiff
Can create venue (and sometimes jurisdiction) by contract (called forum selection)
Before One Can Access Courts, must have an actual ”case” or “controversy”
Standing
Party suing must be injured, must have a real case
Case with test for whether standing is me: Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife
Ripeness
Situation has not yet created a legal dispute
Related to “exhaustion of administrative remedy”
Proper Defendant
Defendant must be the proper party to be sued
Must be right party from whom to hold accountable and recover
Mootness – no longer a controversy
Matter settled prior to trial, a change in the law, a withdrawal of an ordinance, etc.
Name the Proper Defendant with specificity
Statement of Jurisdiction of Court
E.g. defendant residency, occurrence of events
Statement of Facts (Allegations)
Facts must be admitted to or proven over objection
Statement of Claim for Relief
Legal justification for claim
Demand of claim for relief (remedy)
Money damages (general amount “in excess of…”)
Equity damages (specific performance)
Answer
Must respond within prescribed time period
Risk default judgement
Must address factual allegations in complaint
Admit or deny
Clarify or supply alternative facts
Defenses
e.g. “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)] (called a “12(b)(6) Motion”)
Lack of standing, jurisdiction, ripeness, mootness etc.
Counterclaims
Compulsory:
Operates to nullify or offset plaintiff’s claim
Defined as “A pleading must state as a counterclaim any claim that—at the time of its service—the pleader has against an opposing party if the claim:
(a) arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim; and
(b) does not require adding another party over whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(a)(1)
Permissive: “[A]ny claim not compulsory” Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(b)
Generally matters unrelated to Plaintiff’s primary claim
Plaintiff makes a claim upon multiple defendants on set of facts coming from a common transaction or situation
Defendant asserts claim against co-defendant
“Indemnification” – an obligation of a party to reimburse another party for damages and costs associated with a dispute related to their dealings
Normally a matter of contract between parties
If not part of the same case (same general set of facts), cross-claimant must initiate own action against new defendant (original defendant become plaintiff)
Gathering information prior to trial, can be very broad
Interrogatories
Requests for Admission (”admit or deny”)
Requests for Production
Documents
Electronic records
Depositions
Objections to various Discovery
Must preserve objections to requests (for purpose of hearing and appeal)
Example: attorney-client privilege
Motion to Dismiss
Federal Rule 12(b)(6) “Failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted”
Motion for Summary Judgement
No facts are at issue
Motion for Judgement on the pleadings
Legal issue can be decided by Judge (no need for jury to judge the facts)
Both are immediately appealable when granted
Jury Trial (no waiver)
Voir dire
Bench Trial
List of Witnesses
Rules of evidence
Expert testimony (“I am of opinion the X’s chemical discharge killed plaintiff’s bees”)
Fact (event) witnesses (“I saw him…)
Hearsay (“I heard that he said…) (exceptions)
Authentication of item (example: handwriting)
Opening Arguments by both Plaintiff and Defendant
Each side previews its case, summarizes evidence, states why should win
Plaintiff’s Case
Production of evidence
Witness Testimony
Direct Exam by Plaintiff
Cross Exam by Defendant
Re-Direct by Plaintiff to Clarify
Re-Cross by Defendant
Defendant usually moves for dismissal or summary judgement
If granted, appealable
If denied, proceed to defendant’s case
Defendant’s Case
Direct
Cross
Re-Direct
Re-Cross
Closing Arguments
Each side submits jury instructions
Debated in Motion Practice outside of ears of jury
Deliberation
Verdict
Motion for Judgement Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV)
Entry of Verdict
Begins the clock on time limit for appeal
Trial court record contains facts (the trial record)
Evidentiary matters were decided by judge at trial
“Losing” party has right of appeal to appropriate Court
Limited time to file appeal
30 days for most cases in 4th Circuit
Adversarial System (Common Law System)
Adjudicative process
Law applied by precedent
Judge serves as referee
Applies principles of evidence
Parties must bring evidence to court
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Arbitration
Often by contract
Binding on parties
Mediation
Mandatory in North Carolina Superior Court
High rate of success (estimated 90%)
Helps to frame the scope of dispute even if no settlement
Landowner v. Landowner
One private party claims damage from actions of a similar neighbor
Examples: odor or noise nuisance, water damage
Landowner v. Industrial Facility
One private party claims damage from actions of an industrial facility
Common law actions (nuisance, trespass, negligence) and “Citizen Suit” provisions of pollution statutes (e.g. Clean Water Act)
Private Party v. Government
Private individual or organization sues government agency
To force agency to perform duties required by statute
Generally, a refusal of agency to regulate or promulgate a regulation to control pollution
Example: Massachusetts v. EPA
To stop agency from exceeding their authority under a statute
Agency has misinterpreted the law
Source of right to sue
Citizen suit provision of a statute (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act
Suit provision in a procedural statute: Administrative Procedures Act, NEPA, Endangered Species Act, etc.
Limitation on right to sue:
Must meet threshold issues (standing, mootness)
Must exhaust administrative remedies with agency before going to court (when process is required by statute or regulation)
Government v. Private Party
Private party has refused to comply with agency enforcement jurisdiction (authority granted by statute)
Filed as a criminal case by federal or state prosecutor
Example: Rapanos v. U.S.
Plaintiff (aka Petitioner)
shorthand π
Files a complaint, alleges a wrong against specific party, demands relief
Must prove by a preponderance of the evidence
Defendant (aka Respondent)
Shorthand ∆
Alleged to have infringed upon the rights of π
files counterclaim if also injured
Intervenor
Has an interest in the property or right at issue in the litigation
Bound by outcome of case
Amicus Curiae (“Friend of the Court”) (plural: amici curiae)
Seeks to influence decision
Does not wish to become party bound by outcome
Files Amicus Brief in Appellate proceedings only
Example: American Farm Bureau, amicus brief in WOTUS cases
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
28 U.S.C.
Rules of Practice and Procedure for Federal District Court (published by the court)
Special rules for Bankruptcy Court according to Federal District
North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure
N.C.G.S. §1A-1
Agency Appeals Process (Administrative court)
Statutory process for appealing agency action
Denial of permit or levy of fine
Civil Trial
Completion of proper service on Defendant
Distinguish from filing the complaint
Criminal
Grand Jury system (relaxed rules of evidence)
Subject matter jurisdiction (often by statute)
Court may dismiss case without motion from defendant
In Personam – jurisdiction over the person
Minimum contacts rule
Corporate registration requirement (NC Secretary of State)
In Rem – jurisdiction over property (location of property)
Property tax example
Diversity jurisdiction (Federal Court) (28 U.S.C §1332)
ALL civil matters including state law
$75,000 amount in controversy, AND
Plaintiff and Defendant are in different states
Cannot create Federal jurisdiction by contract
Amount in controversy
State court amounts review ($25,000 limit for NC Superior)
Based on locality of dispute
“a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated” (28 U.S. Code §1391(b)(2))
Can be based on residency of defendant
“any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action” (28 U.S. Code §1391(b)(3))
“Convenient to parties and witnesses”
Can be raised pre-trial to change courts (not dismissal of claim)
Litigation tactic by Defendant to increase costs to Plaintiff
Can create venue (and sometimes jurisdiction) by contract (called forum selection)
Before One Can Access Courts, must have an actual ”case” or “controversy”
Standing
Party suing must be injured, must have a real case
Case with test for whether standing is me: Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife
Ripeness
Situation has not yet created a legal dispute
Related to “exhaustion of administrative remedy”
Proper Defendant
Defendant must be the proper party to be sued
Must be right party from whom to hold accountable and recover
Mootness – no longer a controversy
Matter settled prior to trial, a change in the law, a withdrawal of an ordinance, etc.
Name the Proper Defendant with specificity
Statement of Jurisdiction of Court
E.g. defendant residency, occurrence of events
Statement of Facts (Allegations)
Facts must be admitted to or proven over objection
Statement of Claim for Relief
Legal justification for claim
Demand of claim for relief (remedy)
Money damages (general amount “in excess of…”)
Equity damages (specific performance)
Answer
Must respond within prescribed time period
Risk default judgement
Must address factual allegations in complaint
Admit or deny
Clarify or supply alternative facts
Defenses
e.g. “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)] (called a “12(b)(6) Motion”)
Lack of standing, jurisdiction, ripeness, mootness etc.
Counterclaims
Compulsory:
Operates to nullify or offset plaintiff’s claim
Defined as “A pleading must state as a counterclaim any claim that—at the time of its service—the pleader has against an opposing party if the claim:
(a) arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim; and
(b) does not require adding another party over whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(a)(1)
Permissive: “[A]ny claim not compulsory” Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(b)
Generally matters unrelated to Plaintiff’s primary claim
Plaintiff makes a claim upon multiple defendants on set of facts coming from a common transaction or situation
Defendant asserts claim against co-defendant
“Indemnification” – an obligation of a party to reimburse another party for damages and costs associated with a dispute related to their dealings
Normally a matter of contract between parties
If not part of the same case (same general set of facts), cross-claimant must initiate own action against new defendant (original defendant become plaintiff)
Gathering information prior to trial, can be very broad
Interrogatories
Requests for Admission (”admit or deny”)
Requests for Production
Documents
Electronic records
Depositions
Objections to various Discovery
Must preserve objections to requests (for purpose of hearing and appeal)
Example: attorney-client privilege
Motion to Dismiss
Federal Rule 12(b)(6) “Failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted”
Motion for Summary Judgement
No facts are at issue
Motion for Judgement on the pleadings
Legal issue can be decided by Judge (no need for jury to judge the facts)
Both are immediately appealable when granted
Jury Trial (no waiver)
Voir dire
Bench Trial
List of Witnesses
Rules of evidence
Expert testimony (“I am of opinion the X’s chemical discharge killed plaintiff’s bees”)
Fact (event) witnesses (“I saw him…)
Hearsay (“I heard that he said…) (exceptions)
Authentication of item (example: handwriting)
Opening Arguments by both Plaintiff and Defendant
Each side previews its case, summarizes evidence, states why should win
Plaintiff’s Case
Production of evidence
Witness Testimony
Direct Exam by Plaintiff
Cross Exam by Defendant
Re-Direct by Plaintiff to Clarify
Re-Cross by Defendant
Defendant usually moves for dismissal or summary judgement
If granted, appealable
If denied, proceed to defendant’s case
Defendant’s Case
Direct
Cross
Re-Direct
Re-Cross
Closing Arguments
Each side submits jury instructions
Debated in Motion Practice outside of ears of jury
Deliberation
Verdict
Motion for Judgement Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV)
Entry of Verdict
Begins the clock on time limit for appeal
Trial court record contains facts (the trial record)
Evidentiary matters were decided by judge at trial
“Losing” party has right of appeal to appropriate Court
Limited time to file appeal
30 days for most cases in 4th Circuit