Criminal Justice
Introduction
Discussion begins with casual greetings among participants.
Mention of name cards which prompts inquiry about their design.
Key Concepts in Law Enforcement
Reasonable Suspicion: Defined as less than probable cause and a fundamental concept in police encounters.
Importance: Necessary for initiating certain law enforcement actions.
Government Action and Reasonable Suspicion
Ms. Huidardo contributes to the discussion regarding when reasonable suspicion fits into policing.
Limited Search Procedure: Reasonable suspicion allows for limited interactions and searches by law enforcement.
Example of Terry v. Ohio: A landmark case representing the standard for reasonable suspicion.
Details: Officer can engage when they have reasonable suspicion based on observed behavior (e.g., someone acting suspiciously near a jewelry store).
Levels of Encounter for Law Enforcement
First Level Encounter: Police can initiate contact based on reasonable suspicion, not requiring probable cause.
Example Scenario: Approaching someone acting suspiciously (pulling door handles) without definitive evidence of a crime.
Mere Inquiry vs. Detention: Police may ask questions, but individuals can choose not to cooperate and leave.
Caveat: Officers cannot use coercive language or intent when engaging in mere inquiry.
Terry Stops and Pat-downs
Concept of a Terry Stop: Refers to the legal police detention based on reasonable suspicion, allowing officers to conduct limited searches.
Pat-down Policy: Search for weapons must be clearly defined, generally referring to a superficial search for safety (not invasive).
Distinction Between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause
Probable Cause (PC): A higher standard than reasonable suspicion, necessary for arrests, searches, and seizures.
Terminology: Represented by acronym ASS (Arrest, Search, Seizure).
Legal Necessity: Required when taking someone’s liberty away (such as arrest) or searching property.
Civil versus Criminal Trials
Standard of Proof in Civil Trials: Preponderance of evidence (51% certainty) is required.
Example: Differentiating cases such as divorce vs. criminal charges where guilt is a considerable factor.
Standard of Proof in Criminal Trials: Beyond a reasonable doubt (higher threshold).
Critical Case References: O.J. Simpson trial illustrating the standard of reasonable doubt in criminal cases.
The Role of the Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment Overview: Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, establishing legal expectations for police action.
Warrant Requirement: Generally, law enforcement must obtain a warrant signed by a judge based on probable cause, with exceptions noted.
Exemptions from Warrant Requirement
Consent Searches: Police may search if they receive consent from someone with authority over the premises.
Example: If two parties consent differently, police should aim to obtain a warrant.
Emergency Situations: Immediate arrests in plain view do not require warrants.
Car Searches: Vehicles may be searched without a warrant under probable cause conditions due to their mobile nature.
Consent Searches and Limitations
Searching Family Members’ Rooms: Legal authority must be established concerning consent (who can give it).
If a child is involved, parental consent applies; however, strict limits exist around private spaces.
Conflicting Consent Scenarios: Law enforcement must often obtain a warrant when parties do not agree on consent.
Plain View Doctrine
Definition: Legal concept allowing officers to seize evidence they see without a warrant if they are justified in being there.
Illustrative Examples: Scenarios explained involving lawful entry and observable illegal activity, highlighting the limits of police search powers.
The Criminal Justice Process
Cops, Courts, and Corrections: Overview of the criminal justice system and its components.
Social Control: Differentiation between informal social control (community corrections) and formal (law enforcement).
Importance of Criminal Justice: Provides structure for societal behavior and legal consequences for infractions.
Evidence and Trial Process
Grand Jury Proceedings: Discusses formal charges and probable cause required for indictments, referencing the Fifth Amendment.
Due Process: Fundamental fairness governs all legal practices in adjudication, particularly highlighted in Miranda rights contexts.
Theoretical Perspectives in Criminal Justice
Crime Control vs. Rehabilitation: Various perspectives on justice, punishment, and their implications on societal views of criminality.
Conclusion
Exclusionary Rule: Illegally acquired evidence cannot be used in court, reinforcing Fourth Amendment protections.
Review: Emphasis on various legal tenets covered, encouraging further study and understanding of complex legal frameworks involved in law enforcement and the judicial process.