Overview of Accounting for Business Combinations
Learning Objectives
Students completing this module should be able to:
Provide a concise but complete summary of the accounting literature that governs business combinations.
Explain and evaluate push-down accounting, common-control transactions, and asset acquisitions.
Describe key SEC reporting requirements triggered by significant acquisitions.
Compare U.S. GAAP (ASC 805 and related Topics) with IFRS 3.
Context & Philosophy
Each combination is unique ➔ research beyond the module is encouraged (“think and see beyond the box”).
A business combination = any transaction in which an acquirer gains control of a business.
Control has the same meaning as “controlling financial interest,” which is assessed via ASC 810-10 (VIE model or voting-interest model).
Milestones in U.S. GAAP for Business Combinations
Phase 1 (2001) — FASB Statements 141 & 142
Eliminated pooling-of-interest; required purchase method.
ASC 350 (from Statement 142) stops goodwill amortization; introduces impairment testing & separate recognition of certain intangibles.
Phase 2 (Dec 2007) — Statements 141(R) & 160 ➔ codified in ASC 805 & ASC 810-10
Coined the broader term “acquisition method.”
Covers any event where control of a business is obtained (not limited to a purchase).
Added principles-based framework (recognition & measurement principles).
Convergence with IASB: Most issues aligned; some differences remain (see Appendix E).
Subsequent ASUs that amend ASC 805 referenced throughout:
ASU 2017-01 (business definition screen).
ASU 2015-16 (simplified measurement-period adjustments).
ASU 2014-17 (pushdown accounting option).
Core Premise of ASC 805
On obtaining control, the acquirer becomes accountable for all assets & liabilities ➔ recognize them at fair value on the acquisition date, regardless of % acquired.
Recognition Principle
Must recognize identifiable assets, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest (NCI) separately from goodwill.
Measurement Principle
Measure those items at acquisition-date fair value.
Limited exceptions (e.g., taxes under ASC 740, pensions under ASC 715, contingencies, indemnification assets).
Identifying a Business Combination
ASC Master Glossary: “Transaction or other event in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses.”
Not limited to purchases; encompasses consolidations, contract changes, step acquisitions, etc.
Does the Acquiree Qualify as a Business?
ASU 2017-01 screen:
If substantially all fair value of gross assets is concentrated in one identifiable asset (or similar group) ➔ NOT a business (treat as asset acquisition).
When screen fails ➔ must have (a) input + (b) substantive process ➔ together capable of creating outputs.
Effective dates:
Public entities: annual periods after 12-15-2017.
All others: annual periods after 12-15-2018; interim periods after 12-15-2019.
Prospective application; early adoption allowed.
Acquisition Method — Four Mandatory Steps (ASC 805-10-05-4)
Identifying the acquirer
Start with ASC 810-10 guidance; if unclear, apply tiebreaker factors in ASC 805 (§ Module 4).
Determining the acquisition date
Generally the closing date; may differ in rare cases.
Recognizing & measuring identifiable assets, liabilities & NCI
Use fair value; observe specific Scope exceptions (taxes, pensions, indemnifications, contingencies, etc.).
Recognizing & measuring goodwill or bargain-purchase gain
Goodwill is residual:
If the bracketed sum < net assets ➔ recognize bargain purchase gain (after reassessment).
Consideration can be cash, non-cash assets, equity, contingent consideration, share-based awards (latter at ASC 718 FV-based measure).
Measurement-Period Adjustments
Upper limit = 1 year from acquisition date.
ASU 2015-16: adjustments are recognized prospectively in the period identified (no longer restate prior periods); include catch-up of related P&L effects (depreciation, etc.).
Items Not Part of the Business Combination
Payments that settle pre-existing relationships.
Compensation for future services (e.g., replacement awards).
Acquirer’s deal costs (legal, banker fees, etc.).
These must be accounted for separately (expensed or capitalized per other GAAP).
Disclosure Objective (ASC 805-10-50)
Provide info sufficient for users to evaluate nature & financial effect of the combination.
If minimum list inadequate ➔ disclose additional information to satisfy the objective.
Private-Company & Not-for-Profit (NFP) Alternatives
PCC’s dual mandate: develop exceptions/modifications; advise FASB.
ASU 2014-18 (private-company): may not recognize separately:
Customer-related intangibles (unless sale/licensing possible).
Non-compete agreements.
ASU 2014-02 (goodwill):
Amortize goodwill straight-line ≤ 10 yrs.
Impairment only on triggering events.
Test at entity or reporting-unit level; removes Step 2.
ASU 2019-06 extends both alternatives to NFP entities.
Push-Down Accounting (ASC 805-50-PUSH)
Definition: Acquiree elects to re-measure its standalone FS using acquirer’s new-basis FV amounts upon change-in-control.
ASU 2014-17: grants optional application to public & non-public acquirees; replaces prior SEC-only guidance & bright-line thresholds.
Common-Control Transactions (ASC 805-50-CC)
NOT business combinations (parent retains control).
Receiving entity & transferring entity use parent’s historical cost of net assets.
Differences between proceeds & carrying amount ➔ recognized in equity, eliminated on consolidation.
Receiving entity may report prospectively or retrospectively; transferring entity usually shows a disposal.
Asset Acquisitions (ASC 805-50-AA)
Involves assets that fail business definition.
Accounting = cost-accumulation model
Allocate total cost (including certain transaction costs) to assets acquired pro-rata on relative FVs.
No goodwill; no bargain-purchase gains.
Contrast: Business combination uses fair-value model (exclude deal costs; recognize goodwill or gain).
SEC Reporting Considerations (Registrants)
Reg S-X Rule 3-05: acquiree FS may be required when a significant business acquisition is probable or consummated.
Significance tests differ from ASC 805’s business test (Rule 11-01(d)).
Periods & pro forma info (Article 11) depend on level of significance.
Rule 3-14: special abbreviated FS for real-estate operations.
May 2019 SEC Proposed Rule: aims to streamline by
Revising significance tests (reduce anomalous outcomes),
Requiring fewer periods / circumstances,
Permitting abbreviated FS in more cases,
Introducing two pro-forma adjustment categories:
Transaction-accounting adjustments (mandatory bookkeeping for the deal).
Management’s adjustments (reasonably estimable synergies & other effects).
Comparison – U.S. GAAP vs IFRS
Both frameworks largely converged after joint 2007 effort.
Remaining differences summarized in Appendix E (e.g., contingent consideration classification, measurement period nuances, step-acquisition re-measurement mechanics).
References & Suggested Reading
Deloitte, “A Roadmap to Accounting for Business Combinations,” by Michael Morrissey, Stefanie Tamulis et al.
Deloitte, “A Roadmap to SEC Reporting Considerations for Business Combinations.”
Related Heads Up (May 9 2019) on SEC’s proposed changes.
End of consolidated study notes for ACTG6483 — Overview of Accounting for Business Combinations.