LAWS110: Constitutional Law 5
Announcements
Privileges Committee Decision:
- Duncan Webb discussed Te Paati Maori breaching house privilege.
- Proposed suspension of two leaders for 21 days.
- Chris Bishop deferred the debate until after King's Birthday weekend due to the budget.
- The budget is constitutionally significant.
- Suspending MPs affects their ability to participate in parliamentary proceedings.
- Suspension punishes both the MPs and their electorate.
Tareo Quiz:
- Reminder about the quiz this week.
- 83 people have completed the quiz.
- Attend the Tareo Mari workshop before taking the quiz.
Judicial Branch
Branches of Government: Reviewing the branches of government.
- Duncan talked about parliament.
- Executive discussed.
- Judiciary to be covered.
MMP (Mixed Member Proportional Representation):
- Complex system.
- Emphasis on civics education.
- Exam will not require explaining how MMP works.
Key Aspects of MMP
- Election Criteria:
- A party needs 5% of the party vote or one electorate seat to be elected.
- Electorate seats (65 general, 7 Maori) are geographically elected.
- List MPs (48 or 51) are selected from party lists based on national vote proportion.
MMP Quirks and Executive Power
2017 Election Outcome:
- National Party: 44% of the vote, 56 seats.
- Labour Party: 36-37% of the vote, 46 seats.
- Minor Parties: Greens (9), New Zealand First (9), ACT Party (1).
- Winston Peters (New Zealand First) chose to form a coalition with Labour.
- Government: Labour, New Zealand First, and Greens.
- The party with the most votes doesn't always end up in power.
2023 Election:
- National: 38% (48 seats).
- Labour: 26% (34 seats).
- Greens: 11%.
- ACT: 8%.
- New Zealand First: 6%.
- Te Paati Maori: 3% (won 6 electorate seats leading to overhang).
- Parliament size increased to 122 due to overhang.
- Government: National, New Zealand First, ACT. Total of 67 seats out of 123.
Hamilton East/West By-election: Increased total seats to 123 due to a by-election.
Party Vote Importance: Party vote determines overall proportionality.
MMP and Executive Dominance
Executive Dominance Question: Did MMP reduce executive dominance over parliament?
- Single Party Majority: Less likely under MMP.
- 2020 Labour government was an exception but chose to partner with the Greens.
Negotiation and Compromise:
- Political parties must negotiate to form a government.
Smaller Parties' Influence:
- Smaller parties can influence larger parties due to the need for coalitions.
Diversity:
- Increased diversity in parliament.
- Women: 45% of MPs.
- Maori: 27%.
- Pacifica: 6%.
- Asian descent: 6% (underrepresented).
Critiques of MMP
Downsides of MMP:
- 2017 outcome: National got the most votes but didn't form the government.
Minor Parties' Control:
- Tail wagging the dog.
- Treaty Principles Bill example.
Overhang:
- The fact that Te Party Maori won so many electorate seats (6) despite only receiving 3% of the vote, lead to an oversized parliament (123 instead of 120 MPs).
Thresholds:
- The 5% threshold is often debated.
Referendum:
- 2011 referendum: 57% wanted to keep MMP, 42% did not.
Conclusion: MMP has added more checks to the executive branch by requiring compromise.
The Courts, the Judiciary (Na Kote)
Supreme Court
- Current Judges:
- Justice Joe Williams: First Maori member.
- Justice Forrest Miller.
- Justice Susan Glazebroek.
- Chief Justice Dame Helen Winkelman.
- Justice Stephen Koch.
- Justice Ellen France.
Functions of the Judicial Branch
- Interprets and applies parliament's laws.
- Creates common law via precedence.
Appointment of Judges
- Judges are appointed by the Governor-General on the advice of the Attorney-General.
- Attorney-General (Judith Collins) should act apolitically.
- Different from the political process in the US.
Retirement of Judges
- Retirement age is 70.
- Two judges (Forrest Miller and Susan Glazebroek) will retire next year.
- Judges from the Court of Appeal are often "bumped up"."
Relationship Between Courts and Parliament
- Parliamentary Sovereignty: Duncan presented as a skeptic, but it's important to consider the other side.
- Can the courts stop parliament from making inappropriate laws? No.
Case Studies
Falema'i Lesa v Attorney-General (1982)
- Background: New Zealand's role as colonial administrator of Samoa (1914-1962).
- Citizenship Status: Unclear during New Zealand's administration.
- Dawn Raids: Resulted in cases about deportation of alleged overstayers.
- Falema'i Lesa's Argument: She was a New Zealand citizen because she was born during the period when New Zealand administered Samoa.
- Privy Council Decision: All Samoans born between 1924 and 1948 were New Zealand citizens.
- Impact: 100,000 Samoans would have to be recognized as citizens.
- Citizenship (Western Samoa) Act 1982: Overturned the Privy Council decision with exception of miss Lesa which kept her citizenship.
- Citizenship of Western Samoa Restoration Amendment Act 2024: Restored citizenship to people born between 1924 and 1948 (about 3,500 people).
Attorney-General v Ngati Apa (2003)
- Foreshore and Seabed Case.
- Context: Helen Clark's Labour Government.
- Issue: Whether the Maori Land Court had jurisdiction to consider claims whether the foreshore and seabed was Maori customary land.
- Misunderstanding: The public thought the court decided all foreshore and seabed was Maori customary land.
- Result: Public protests.
- Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004: Crown owns foreshore and seabed on behalf of all New Zealanders.
- Tariana Turia: Left the Labour Party and set up Te Paati Maori.
- Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011: Repealed 2004 act.
Family Carers Case
- Cliff Robinson: Primary carer for his two adult children with disabilities.
- Issue: Challenging government policy not to pay family carers.
- Discrimination: Family carers wouldn't get an allowance, but non-family carers would.
- Court of Appeal Decision: Policy was unlawful discrimination on the grounds of family status.
- Public Health and Disability Amendment Bill: Overturned the decision.
- Reason: Cost to taxpayer.
- Public Health and Disability Amendment Act 2020: Some payment of family carers in certain situations.
Common Themes and Questions
Commonality: All cases involve minorities.
- Samoans, Maori, and people with disabilities.
Cherry-Picked Cases? Yes. But parliament often uses its power against minorities. Known as the tyranny of the majority.
Effectiveness of New Zealand's Constitution: Not very effective at protecting minorities.
Parliamentary Effectiveness: In the end, parliament did address the issues.
- Amended/repealed acts.
Judicial Review: New Zealand's courts lack the power to strike down legislation.