Comparative Study of QlikView, Spotfire & Tableau – Detailed Exam Notes
Big Data and Business Intelligence: Context
- Big Data
- Refers to very large, highly complex collections of datasets that traditional data-processing software cannot handle efficiently.
- Necessitates specialised tools and technologies for storage, processing, and analysis.
- Business Intelligence (BI)
- Broad category of technologies, applications, practices, and activities devoted to collecting, integrating, analysing, and presenting data.
- Goal: support organisations in making better, faster, and more accurate business decisions.
- Output usually delivered as interactive dashboards and visualisations that can be accessed by both technical and non-technical users.
- Must comfortably process large volumes of data.
- Should accept and display dynamic, real-time data streams.
- Need rich data-visualisation options (charts, graphs, maps, etc.).
- Require basic programming/query capabilities—e.g., SQL functions—for custom report generation.
- Should create and maintain reliable data backups in case a live data-source connection fails.
Challenges in Adopting BI
- Lack of a clear business strategy during BI project planning.
- Poor or incomplete data collection methods.
- High costs of acquisition, licensing, and operation of some BI platforms.
- Ongoing maintenance and user-training burdens.
- Improved organisational efficiency and productivity.
- More accurate planning, analysis, and decision-making.
- Ability to measure key performance indicators (KPIs) effectively.
- Simplified tracking of day-to-day business activities.
- Faster, easier access to mission-critical information for all stakeholders.
- QlikView (by Qlik)
- Integrates disparate data rapidly into a single, in-memory analytics application.
- One consolidated dashboard provides a holistic view of operations.
- Tableau
- Interactive data-visualisation suite using worksheets and dashboards.
- Non-technical users can build custom visuals with drag-and-drop ease.
- TIBCO Spotfire
- Combines robust visual analytics with predictive modelling.
- Employs AI-driven data-discovery features for deeper trend insight.
Comparative Analysis of QlikView, Spotfire, and Tableau
1. Data-Source Connectivity
- QlikView
- Broad range of built-in connectors: Amazon Redshift/Vectorwise/EC2, Cloudera & Hortonworks Hadoop, HP Vertica, IBM Netezza, MicroStrategy, MS SQL Server, MySQL, ODBC, ParAccel, Salesforce, SAP (incl. SAP HANA), Teradata, etc.
- Supports R integration through APIs and can connect to other Big-Data platforms.
- MDX (Multidimensional Expressions) connectivity can pose challenges.
- Spotfire
- Connectivity quality rated “Excellent” with extensive native connectors.
- Comparable breadth to Tableau (see below) and can integrate with R for advanced analytics.
- Tableau
- Also “Excellent” with native links to spreadsheets, CSV, SQL databases, Cloudera Hadoop, Firebird, Google Analytics, Google BigQuery, Hortonworks Hadoop, HP Vertica, MS SQL Server, MySQL, Salesforce, Teradata, etc.
- R integration available, bolstering statistical and predictive functions.
2. Deployment Complexity
- QlikView – Medium complexity.
- Spotfire – Easy.
- Tableau – Easy.
3. Usability & Interactivity
- QlikView – Rated Excellent.
- Spotfire – Very Good.
- Tableau – Excellent.
- All three provide:
- Drill-up / drill-down navigation.
- Multi-range filters, bookmarks, mouse-hover tooltips.
- Strong collaboration options (sharing, commenting, web embedding).
4. Device Independence (Mobile, Tablet, Desktop)
- QlikView – Yes (full support).
- Spotfire – Yes to some extent (partial / device-specific limitations).
- Tableau – Yes (responsive designs, native mobile apps).
- QlikView
- Script-based modelling and ETL built in; supports complex transformation logic.
- Spotfire
- Limited data-transformation functions (blending, pivoting, metadata layer) but no deep ETL for highly complex use cases.
- Tableau
- Similar limitations: blending, pivoting, minor cleansing; no advanced ETL like Alteryx, Datameer, or Palantir.
6. Visualisation & Reporting Flexibility
- QlikView, Spotfire, and Tableau alike provide numerous user-configurable charts, can change visual type “on the fly,” and support parameter-driven reporting.
7. Ad-Hoc Reporting
- All three tools allow end-users to create self-service (ad-hoc) reports through both desktop and web interfaces.
- Online ISSN of publishing journal: 2278−8808.
- SJIF 2018 impact factor of the journal: 6.371.
- Publication issue: January–February 2019, Volume 6/49, pages 11645−11648.
Conclusion Drawn by the Authors
- The open-source and commercial BI landscape is rapidly evolving, especially regarding visual-appeal and data-connectivity features.
- After reviewing QlikView, Spotfire, and Tableau along multiple dimensions (connectivity, deployment, usability, transformation, interactivity), organisations should match tool strengths to their specific data strategies, infrastructure, skillsets, and budget constraints.
Connections & Broader Implications
- Aligns with industry shift toward self-service analytics empowering non-technical decision-makers.
- Highlights the growing importance of real-time dashboards for competitive advantage.
- Underlines that BI adoption is not purely technological; it requires strategic planning and data-governance frameworks to avoid common pitfalls like irrelevant data capture.
Key References (for Further Reading)
- Dr. Sailesh S. Iyer & Dr. Kamaljit Lakhtaria – Practical evaluation of Big Data analytical tools.
- Harshil T. Kanakia – Comparative study on BI report generation.
- S. Vidhya et al. – Diverse Big Data analytics tools.
- Emmanuel Ahishakiye et al. – Open-source BI in crime analytics.
- Divyani Shrivastava et al. – Comparative study of BI tools.
- Victor M. Parra et al. – Pentaho vs. Jaspersoft for Big Data.
- Dr. Venkatesh Naganathan – Big Data analytics challenges and trends.
- Capterra BI features list (web resource).