EC201 LECTURE WEEK 3 MARTZ
Lecture 3: Goods & Financial Markets: The IS-LM Model (Chapter 5)
Overview of Goods Market and IS Relation
Equilibrium in the goods market:
Exists when production is equal to the demand for goods .
Previously, in Chapter 3, the interest rate did not affect demand for goods.
Equilibrium condition (5-1):
Where:
= consumption function
= investment
= government spending
= taxes
Investment, Sales, and the Interest Rate
Two factors affecting investment:
Level of sales (positive effect)
Interest rate (negative effect)
Investment relation:
Determining Output
Considering the investment relation:
New equilibrium condition in the goods market:
Deriving the IS Curve
Demand for goods is an increasing function of output.
Equilibrium requirements:
Must be that demand for goods equals output.
IS Curve Characteristics:
An increase in the interest rate leads to a decrease in output.
Thus, the IS curve is downward sloping.
Shifts of the IS Curve
Effects of an increase in taxes:
Shifts IS curve to the left.
Graphical representation:
Interest rate (i) on the vertical axis; output (Y) on the horizontal axis.
Original IS: IS (for taxes T) and new IS after tax increase: IS' (for T' > T).
Financial Markets and the LM Relation
The interest rate is determined by the equilibrium condition of money supply and demand:
nominal money stock
demand for money
Variables:
= nominal income
= nominal interest rate
Assumption for analysis:
Central bank keeps constant; thus, is market-determined.
In future studies, the central bank's role in choosing will be examined.
Key formula (5-2):
Real Money, Real Income, and the Interest Rate
LM Relation:
In equilibrium, the real money supply equals real money demand.
Related to (real income) and (interest rate):
Deriving the LM Curve
As income increases, at a given interest rate, the demand for money rises.
Given the money supply, this increase leads to a higher equilibrium interest rate.
Graphical understanding:
The LM curve is upward sloping.
Shifts of the LM Curve
An increase in the money supply will shift the LM curve down.
Integrating IS and LM Relations
Equilibrium conditions:
An increase in the interest rate causes a decrease in output (IS relation).
An increase in output causes an increase in the interest rate (LM relation).
Intersection of IS and LM curves:
Both markets (goods and financial) achieve equilibrium.
Equations Recap:
IS relation:
LM relation:
Fiscal Policy, Activity, and the Interest Rate
Fiscal contraction:
Refers to fiscal policy aimed at reducing the budget deficit.
Fiscal expansion:
An increase in the deficit.
Impact of taxes on the curves:
Taxes affect the IS curve but do not change the LM curve.
Effects of an Increase in Taxes
An increase in taxes leads to a leftward shift of the IS curve.
Results in a decrease in both equilibrium output and equilibrium interest rate.
Monetary Policy, Activity, and the Interest Rate
Monetary contraction:
Refers to a decrease in the money supply.
Monetary expansion:
An increase in the money supply.
Implication of monetary policy:
It does not affect the IS curve, only the LM curve.
Example: An increase in the money supply shifts the LM curve down.
Current assumption: the central bank keeps fixed.
Effects of Monetary Expansion:
Results in higher output and lower interest rate.
Summary of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Effects
Table 5.1 presents shifts and movements resulting from changes in fiscal and monetary policies:
Increase in Taxes:
IS shifts left, LM unchanged, output decreases, interest rate decreases.
Decrease in Taxes:
IS shifts right, LM unchanged, output increases, interest rate increases.
Increase in Spending:
IS shifts right, LM unchanged, output increases, interest rate increases.
Decrease in Spending:
IS shifts left, LM unchanged, output decreases, interest rate decreases.
Increase in Money Supply:
IS unchanged, LM shifts down, output increases, interest rate decreases.
Decrease in Money Supply:
IS unchanged, LM shifts up, output decreases, interest rate increases.
Using a Policy Mix
Monetary and fiscal policies are interdependent and rarely conducted in isolation.
This combined approach is known as the monetary-fiscal policy mix or simply policy mix.
Example Scenario:
Fiscal contraction (decreasing government spending or increasing taxes ) with two approaches to monetary policy:
Central bank maintains constant.
Central bank keeps interest rate constant at (more common practice).
Effects of Fiscal Contraction
Leads to lower output (from ) if the central bank keeps the interest rate constant.
Australian Policy Mixes (1986–2012)
Hawke–Johnston/Fraser:
Tight fiscal, tight monetary policy adversely affects output, resulting in recession (1990-91).
Keating–Fraser:
Easy fiscal, easy monetary policy aids recovery from recession.
Howard–Macfarlane (1996–2002):
Tight fiscal, easy monetary policy allows modest growth.
Howard–Macfarlane/Stevens (2002–2008):
Tight fiscal, tight monetary policy enables continued growth without capacity constraints.
Rudd/Gillard–Stevens (2008–2012):
Response to global financial crisis leads to fiscal and monetary stimuli, shifting the IS curve positively.
Policy Responses to the US Recession of 2001
Federal Funds Rate Analysis:
Historical trend of interest rates from 1999Q1 to 2002Q4 shows a decline in rates as policy responded to recession impact.
Government revenues and spending:
Ratios to GDP analyzed quarterly from 1999Q1 to 2002Q4, indicating patterns in fiscal policy adjustments during recession.
IS-LM Model and Real-World Applications
Empirical analysis reveals:
An increase in the federal funds rate typically decreases output and increases unemployment with little effect on price levels.
This reflects the short-run dynamics within the IS-LM model framework, where monetary policy directly influences economic conditions.