Economic History - Lesson 1 Notes
Economic History (L-Z Group) - Lesson 01 - A.Y. 2024-2025
Agenda
- The Great Divergence: Long-term dynamics
- When did Western countries become rich?
- The Rise of the West
Part I: The Great Divergence - Long Term Dynamics
- When did Western countries become rich?
Outcomes
- Understanding the Great Divergence: meaning and economic perspectives.
- Understanding the economic growth model of Western Countries.
- Knowing the background of the first globalization.
The Great Divergence
- A fundamental question for economic historians: Why are some countries rich and others poor?
- This question arises from studying historical income data.
- In the distant past, prosperity differences between countries were not so high.
- The concept of a division between rich and poor countries emerged at the end of the Middle Ages, particularly around the time of the great ocean explorations.
The Great Divergence - Robert Allen's Three Periods
- Robert Allen divides the last 500 years into three periods:
- 1500-1800: The Mercantilist Era
- Mercantilism Definition: A school of thought emphasizing the balance of trade. It defined a nation's wealth by its holding of precious metals, seeking to minimize imports and maximize exports through subsidies and tariffs.
- Maritime conquests led to the first economic integration across the world.
The Great Divergence - Mercantilist Era cont.
- Europe at the center of the world:
- From the Americas, Europeans acquired precious metals (silver, gold) and goods (sugar, tobacco).
- From Asia, Europe imported spices, textiles, and porcelain.
- Africans were shipped as slaves to the Americas to work on large plantations.
The Great Divergence - Mercantilist Era cont.
- The mercantilist era was ruled by protectionism:
- European countries used tariffs and economic barriers to prevent trade with other countries.
- Economic development wasn't a primary issue for countries; the aim was to control the balance of payments (positive) and accumulate wealth.
The Great Divergence - The Catching Up (19th Century)
- 19th Century: The Catching Up
- Great Britain (GB) was the most industrialized country and the leader in manufacturing.
- Establishment of the free market economy.
- Laissez-faire replaced Mercantilism in GB.
- Economics became an established discipline, and economic theory spread.
- Western Europe and America started catching up, focusing on economic development through industrialization (second sector).
- Laissez-faire began to be challenged, with a return to protectionism and state interventionism, even within free trade.
The Great Divergence - Policies to Achieve Development
- Policies to achieve development:
- Creation of unified national markets.
- Re-introduction of protectionism (to reduce GB leadership).
- Establishment of complex financial systems (to sustain industrial development).
- Establishment of educational systems (to improve human capital).
- This set of policies was successful in Western Europe (WE), especially Germany, and North America, which joined Great Britain in the "rich nations club."
- In other regions, these policies failed to produce the same effects.
The Great Divergence - The 20th Century
- 20th Century
- Distances between countries increased further in some cases.
- New technologies required more capital, which were not cost-effective in low-wage countries.
- Most countries adopted modern technologies to some extent, but not enough to catch up.
- Nations that closed the gap used a "Big Push" (government interventions).
- From 1500 to 1800, the countries that are now the richest began distancing themselves from the rest of the world.
- This gap widened, especially towards certain countries/regions that remained in a stationary state of poverty.
- GDP and data analysis support this point.
GDP Data Analysis
- R. Allen, Global Economic History, pp. 4-5
- Table: Countries GDP, benchmark years (1820-2008)
- 1820: Netherlands led the West.
- 1820: Europe led the world.
- 1820: Africa was the poorest continent.
- Income disparities between countries have increased over time.
- 2008: The African continent remains the poorest; Asia and Latin America have intermediate incomes but still far behind the richest countries.
- R. Allen, Global Economic History, p. 6
- Figure: The Great Divergence
- Regions with higher incomes in 1820 also had larger quantities of growth factors.
- Europe and the British offshoots realized income gains of 17- to 25-fold.
- Exceptions: East Asia and Japan.
Distribution of World Manufacturing
- R. Allen, Global Economic History, p. 7
- Figure: Distribution of world manufacturing
- 1750: China was the manufacturer of the world (33% of the world total); by the early 1900s, its relevance dropped to 4%.
- 1913: The UK, USA, and Europe accounted for around 75% of the world total.
- Main reason for great income divergence: industrialization and de-industrialization processes.
- 4 stages: 1750-1880s; 1880-WWII; 1950s-1970s; >1980s.
Wellbeing Measurement
- R. Allen, Global Economic History, p. 7
- Figure: A measure of wellbeing (subsistence ratio for laborers)
- In 1400, living conditions in Europe were similar.
- The Industrial Revolution in England led to a marked improvement in welfare for the English.
- In contrast, on the continent, there was a sharp decline in wellbeing.
- Other observations:
- Bare-bones subsistence removes the economic motivation for economic development (poverty trap).
- Some scholars argue that the Industrial Revolution resulted from high wages.
Part II: The Rise of the West
Outcomes - Rise of the West
- Know the fundamentals of the rise of the West.
- Be clear on the background of the first globalization.
The Rise of the West: Commercial Capitalism
- What drove the growth of the West?
- Fundamentals like geography, institutions, and culture were relevant to the rise of the West.
The Rise of the West: Factors
- Geography: The presence of certain diseases, such as malaria in the tropics, limited development possibilities.
- Culture: Culture is a popular explanation for economic success, including literacy and numeracy.
- Institutions (political and legal): Economists are divided on the role of institutions in economic development:
- Some argue that economic success is due to the assertion of property rights, lower taxes, and a minimal state (classical economics).
- Others point out that Oriental despotism also worked, providing peace, order, and good government.
The Rise of the West: Conclusion
- Political and legal institutions, geography, and culture all played a role in the great divergence.
- However, the great divergence was primarily the result of:
- Technological change
- Globalization
- Economic policies
The First Globalisation Background
- Long-distance trade is a distinctive feature of Europe-Asia relations dating back to ancient times.
- The Silk Road, a land route, connected Eurasia.
- Towards the end of the Middle Ages, Europeans launched expeditions to exploit waterways.
- Technical improvements (full-rigged ships) facilitated this.
- The trade axis shifted first to the Iberian Peninsula and then to the north-west regions of Europe.
- East Indie companies (privileged trading companies) (early 1600s) exemplified colonialism exploitation.
- This model, used by the Dutch and GB, combined imperialism with private enterprise.
- They were highly capitalized joint stock companies that traded in Asia or in Americas, maintained military and naval forces, and set up trading posts abroad
- The process culminated in Great Britain with the Industrial Revolution.
The First Globalisation - Summary
- Success in the global (commercial) economy had major implications for economic development:
- Growth in manufacturing and urbanization increased labor demand --> increase in wages (and in living standards).
- Increase in urban population and manufacturing activities led to development in agriculture (agricultural revolution in both Dutch and England).
- Increase in urban population required development in energy resources: coal became the substitute for wood (GB).
- The high-wage economy generated a high level of literacy and numeracy (human capital).