Introduction to Argument and Language Analysis

Core Components of Argument

  • Contention: The writer's overarching opinion or main stance on a specific issue.

  • Supporting Points: The logical justifications used to build and defend the contention.

  • Evidence: Concrete data, facts, or expert opinions that validate supporting points.

  • Distinction: The contention is the "what" (the opinion), while the arguments provide the "why" (the reasons).

Issue, Context, and Contention

  • Issue: The broad topic or the specific debate (e.g., human behavior changes regarding climate change).

  • Context: The background events, decisions, or medium of publication (e.g., an editorial in The Age vs. a public speech) that prompted the text.

  • Identifying Contention: It may be explicitly stated or implied through tone and selection of evidence. It is not always found at the start of a text.

Purpose, Audience, and Stakeholders

  • Purpose: The desired outcome, such as influencing the audience to take action, side with a view, or consider an ethical concern.

  • Audience: The specific group or individual targeted by the writer.

  • Stakeholders: Persons with a vested interest or professional affiliation (e.g., a CEO of a coal-mining organization or a member of an Aboriginal community). They may offer expert knowledge but may also be influenced by self-interest.

Counterarguments and Tone

  • Counterarguments: Used to acknowledge and refute opposing views, thereby enhancing the writer's credibility and exposing flaws in alternate positions.

  • Tone: The writer's attitude or emotional underpinning. Changes in vocabulary often signal a shift in tone (e.g., moving from an angry, attacking tone to a cautionary or optimistic one).

Analytical Framework: WHAT, HOW, WHY, SO

  • WHAT: Identifying the specific point or focus the writer is making at a given moment.

  • HOW: Explaining the language features and persuasive techniques (e.g., inclusive language, rhetorical questions) used to present the point.

  • WHY: Analyzing the intended effect on the audience's thoughts and feelings.

  • SO: Connecting the analysis of specific sections back to the writer's ultimate contention and purpose.

Planning and Writing the Analysis

  • Planning: Involves identifying the contention, mapping the sequence of supporting points, and annotating evidence and language techniques.

  • Introduction Elements:

    • Identification of the issue.

    • Details of the creator, title, and intended audience.

    • Publication context.

    • Clear statement of the main contention and purpose.

  • Body Paragraphs: Must features a topic sentence, close textual reference, and explanation of persuasive effects through the WHAT, HOW, WHY, SO structure.

Questions & Discussion

Activity: Identifying Contention and Supporting Arguments
  • Excerpt 1 (Gabrielle Appleby and Ron Levy, The Australian): Discusses the voice referendum and the Westminster system of democracy. The contention is that the Australian people should adopt the voice proposal to improve democracy for everyone.

  • Excerpt 2 (Anthony Straker, letter to the editor, The Age): Concerns noise from helicopters during the grand prix. The contention is that constant helicopter traffic is an unfair nuisance to local residents.

Activity: Analyzing Tone
  • Josie Jones Letter on TikTok: The writer begins with a mocking or sarcastic tone regarding "motivating dance challenges" but shifts to a critical and concerned tone when describing the platform as a "time-sucker" that destroys social circles for Gen-Z.