Notes on Maurice Denis's 'Definition of Neo-Traditionism'
Maurice Denis (1870-1943) - 'Definition of Neo-Traditionism'
Introduction
Maurice Denis, at the age of twenty, was a student at the Beaux-Arts and Académie Julian.
He learned about Gauguin and Bernard's work at Pont-Aven from Paul Sérusier.
The painters at Académie Julian, including Bonnard, Vuillard, and Ranson, formed the Nabis, a Symbolist faction.
Other Nabis members included Ibels, Roussel, Verkade, Valotton, and Maillol.
Denis's opening statement connects late 19th-century Symbolist theories with early 20th-century abstract art.
It prioritizes painting's formal and decorative principles over narration and description.
His academic teachers would not have necessarily disagreed with this statement.
The article's modernism lies in its rejection of Naturalist principles and assertion of 'aesthetic imagination'.
Denis painted modernized versions of traditional Catholic motifs and achieved success in 1889 with his Catholic Mystery.
The article was originally published in Art et Critique in 1890 under the pseudonym Pierre-Louis.
It was later reprinted in Denis's Théories 1890-1910.
Core Argument
I. Essence of a Picture
A picture should be viewed, first and foremost, as "a flat surface covered with colours arranged in a particular pattern."
II. Defining Painting of 'Nature'
The task is to define painting of 'nature', the dominant theory of art at the end of the century.
Optical experience is insufficient due to intellectual habits influencing vision.
Examples: Attempts to perceive trompe-l'oeil in art, Signac's scientific arguments for chromatic insights, and Bouguereau's conviction in copying 'nature'.
III. Museum Experience
In a museum, each canvas can give a sense of reality, but it's what you expect to see that you find.
It's possible to see 'nature' in these pictures, but it's also possible not to.
Painters tend to relate perceived reality to existing paintings.
Intellectual activity can create optical anomalies, like perceiving greys as violet after searching for it.
Admiration for old pictures can distort the eyes of art teachers.
'Nature' is always changing and subject to fashion, differing between salons and eras.
IV. Modern Artist's Interpretation
Modern artists adopt an eclectic and exclusive habit of interpreting optical sensations through choice and synthesis.
This becomes the criterion of naturalism: the painter's sense of self or 'temperament'.
It is a kind of hallucination beyond aesthetic judgment that reason cannot control.
V. Aesthetic Judgment and Temperament
When someone claims that nature is more beautiful than any painting, they assert their impressions of nature are superior.
Comparing the impact of the original and its imprint on someone's mind highlights the issue of temperament.
Definition: 'Art is nature seen through a temperament.'
It is vague and lacks a precise measure for judging temperament.
Aesthetics is a science that deals with these matters, developing through investigations by figures like Charles Henry and the psychology of Spencer and Bain.
Sensations should be evaluated in terms of beauty before externalizing them.
VI. Naturalism and the Renaissance
Painters have failed to understand the term 'naturalist' in a philosophical sense applied to the Renaissance.
Fra Angelico and Ghirlandaio's works recall 'nature' more accurately than Giorgione, Raphael, or da Vinci.
It is simply a different way of seeing, a different kind of imagination.
VII. Constant Change in Sensations
Sensations are constantly changing, whether as subject or object.
It is difficult to recreate the same composition due to life, color intensity, light, movement, and atmosphere.
VIII. Photography and Plaster Casts
Photography informs us of the degree of reality of a form, and a plaster cast from nature is 'as natural as possible'.
'Natural' includes trompe-l'oeil and panoramas that blur the line between reality and canvas.
IX. Sincerity and Naivety
"Be sincere; you need only be sincere in order to paint well. Be naive. Paint quite simply what you see."
Academies have tried to produce infallible, rigorously precise machines.
X. Bouguereau's Teaching
Bouguereau's teaching exemplifies that the secret of drawing lies in the articulation of the joints.
His mind was fixated on the anatomical complexity of the joints.
Some find a resemblance to Ingres, even thinking Bouguereau has progressed further.
XI. Degradation of Naturalism
Petty painters have retained vague memories of Old Masters, distorting their aesthetic.
They are busy messing up the canvases of the Renaissance.
XIII. The Immorality of Naturalism
A modern master criticizes a painting of a woman for not being 'natural' enough to be desirable.
This raises questions about the morality of art, comparing symbols, photographs, and nudes.
Analytical works with trompe-l'oeil are criticized for appealing to both youths and libertines.
XIV. Return to Beautiful Things
There are beginnings of a return to beautiful things among the Impressionists, led by Manet.
Imitators seek colorful natural scenes but spoil the fresh taste of their original sensation.
They disdain composition and prioritize being natural, with an exasperating mania for modelling.
XV. Gauguin's History of Modelling
'Art is the form turning' ['L'art, c'est quand ça tourne'],
Gauguin's history of modelling:
Pure arabesque is far from trompe-l'oeil.
Painted bas-reliefs.
Artists attempted ornamental trompe-l'oeil in the fifteenth century.
Modelling finds its perfection in full relief.
XVI. Early French Sculpture
Early French sculpture derives from Byzantine manuscript illumination.
Folds of togas and robes are used as simple arabesques with no concern for draping real cloth.
Sérusier explained how this tendency runs through archaic Athenes, Tanagra figurines, and Greek statues.
Unrealistic folds were introduced to fill gaps, creating relief.
XVIII. Literature and the Plastic Arts
Our times are literary, refining even minutiae.
In periods of decadence, the plastic arts dwindle into literary affectation or naturalistic negation.
XIX. Renaissance Artists
Renaissance artists let their profound work pour forth naturally.
Michelangelo did not have to struggle to appear great, unlike Bernini or Annibale Carracci.
Trying too hard ruined the Romantics.
XX. Sentiment and Emotion
True sentiment arises from the soul of the artist.
'He who would paint the things of Christ should live with Christ', said Fra Angelico.
Emotions are provoked through the canvas itself, a flat surface bathed in color.
These emotions are 'literary' and do not need to impose memories of past feelings.
A Byzantine Christ is a symbol; the Jesus of modern painters is merely literary.
Form is expressive in the former; expression is attempted through imitation of nature in the latter.
Any representation may appear natural, and any beautiful work of art can provoke absolute emotions.
Even linear invention and the Parthenon frieze have emotional value.
Beethoven's sonatas evoke emotion as well.
XXI. Redemption of the Human Form
The Doryphorus, the Diadumenus, the Achilles, the Venus de Milo, the Winged Victory, and the Saints of the Middle Ages are a redemption of the human form.
Rodin's John the Baptist was inspired by a venerable bronze, the embodiment of the Word in motion.
Puvis de Chavannes selected a man to be his Poor Fisherman, expressing eternal sorrow.
Aesthetic imagination triumphs over crude imitation, and the emotions of beauty triumph over the lies of Naturalism.
XXII. True Form of Art
When unjustifiable bias and illogical prejudice are eliminated, the field remains open to painters of imagination and aesthetic thinkers.
Neo-Traditionism must not become trapped in psychological theories or literary sentimentality.
Neo-Traditionism has reached the moment of definitive synthesis.
All is contained within the beauty of the work of art.
XXIII. Originality and Modern Painters
Artists who rack their brains for originality, rejecting their true feelings, are fools.
Modern painters are distinguished through their vision, technique, and subject matter.
They all follow the same fashion.
XXIV. Sanctification of Nature
Art is the sanctification of nature, transforming vulgar feelings of natural objects into sacred icons.
The hieratic simplicity of figures of the Buddha, the lions of Khorsabad, and the Doryphorus exemplify this.