Environmental Psychology: Environmental Risks and Perception and Environmental Stress
Risk refers to a situation, event, or activity which may lead to uncertain adverse outcomes affecting something that humans value
2 components:
Severity
Uncertainty of the adverse outcome
Risks for the environment (e.g. acidification of oceans caused by anthropogenic carbon dioxide)
Risks from the environment (e.g., destruction of human habitat due to flooding
Environmental risks often emerge from the aggregated behaviors of many individuals (e.g. use of fossil fuels) rather than from a single activity
Examples of Fossil Fuels: coal, oil, natural gas, kerosene, propane
Mitigation requires behavior change of many people
The consequences of environmental hazards are often temporally delayed and geographically distant
The people who contribute to a risk (e.g. industrial countries) are not necessarily the ones who suffer the consequences (e.g. developing countries, future generations
Risk perception refers to people’s subjective judgment about the risk that is associated with some activity, event, or technology.
Environmental Risk Perception, Risk Culture, and Pro-Environmental Behavior
Strongest beta = risk perception and pro-environmental behavior
How we see risks influences our pro-environmental behavior
Public Perception of Climate Change and Disaster Preparedness: Evidence from the Philippines
Large population with low knowledge of climate change and the risk of climate change
Little population have high knowledge of climate change and the risk of climate change
Heuristics and Biases in Risk Judgments:
Availability Heuristic
People often rely on the “ease” with which relevant instances of an event can be retrieved from memory (e.g., seeing the threats and consequences of environmental problems can increase risk judgments)
More risky if they learn about it
Media’s role is a huge influence on our knowledge and risk judgement on climate change
Affect Heuristic
If individuals feel positive about an activity, they tend to judge the risk as low and the benefit as high
If they feel negative about an activity, they tend to judge the risk as high and the benefit as low
Temporal Discounting
Refers to the psychological phenomenon that outcomes in the far future are subjectively less significant than immediate outcomes
Less likely to engage in pro-environmental behavior because you only think about the immediate outcome rather than the outcomes in the far future
Deontological Principle
Focus is on the inherent rightness or wrongness of the act per se
Consequentialist Principle
Focus on the magnitude and likelihood of consequences
People in general react emotionally to disasters if they see that the disasters are caused by human actions rather than natural disasters.
Emotions = strong drivers of behaviors
Factors in the environment that causes us stress
Environmental Stressor
(e.g. noise, crowding, pollution)
Can be acute (e.g. Pollution levels when stuck in a tunnel)
Can be chronic (e.g. living nearby a trafficked highway)
Noise
Increases stress hormones
Lower levels of well-being
Extraversion is more tolerant to city noise
Crowding
One may lose personal space
associated with social withdrawal
Associated with stress hormone levels for adults
Poor Housing Quality
Children, adolescents, and adults displayed higher levels of stress hormones
Traffic Congestion
May lead to elevated physiological stress and negative affect
More negative social interactions with their family members at home
Risk refers to a situation, event, or activity which may lead to uncertain adverse outcomes affecting something that humans value
2 components:
Severity
Uncertainty of the adverse outcome
Risks for the environment (e.g. acidification of oceans caused by anthropogenic carbon dioxide)
Risks from the environment (e.g., destruction of human habitat due to flooding
Environmental risks often emerge from the aggregated behaviors of many individuals (e.g. use of fossil fuels) rather than from a single activity
Examples of Fossil Fuels: coal, oil, natural gas, kerosene, propane
Mitigation requires behavior change of many people
The consequences of environmental hazards are often temporally delayed and geographically distant
The people who contribute to a risk (e.g. industrial countries) are not necessarily the ones who suffer the consequences (e.g. developing countries, future generations
Risk perception refers to people’s subjective judgment about the risk that is associated with some activity, event, or technology.
Environmental Risk Perception, Risk Culture, and Pro-Environmental Behavior
Strongest beta = risk perception and pro-environmental behavior
How we see risks influences our pro-environmental behavior
Public Perception of Climate Change and Disaster Preparedness: Evidence from the Philippines
Large population with low knowledge of climate change and the risk of climate change
Little population have high knowledge of climate change and the risk of climate change
Heuristics and Biases in Risk Judgments:
Availability Heuristic
People often rely on the “ease” with which relevant instances of an event can be retrieved from memory (e.g., seeing the threats and consequences of environmental problems can increase risk judgments)
More risky if they learn about it
Media’s role is a huge influence on our knowledge and risk judgement on climate change
Affect Heuristic
If individuals feel positive about an activity, they tend to judge the risk as low and the benefit as high
If they feel negative about an activity, they tend to judge the risk as high and the benefit as low
Temporal Discounting
Refers to the psychological phenomenon that outcomes in the far future are subjectively less significant than immediate outcomes
Less likely to engage in pro-environmental behavior because you only think about the immediate outcome rather than the outcomes in the far future
Deontological Principle
Focus is on the inherent rightness or wrongness of the act per se
Consequentialist Principle
Focus on the magnitude and likelihood of consequences
People in general react emotionally to disasters if they see that the disasters are caused by human actions rather than natural disasters.
Emotions = strong drivers of behaviors
Factors in the environment that causes us stress
Environmental Stressor
(e.g. noise, crowding, pollution)
Can be acute (e.g. Pollution levels when stuck in a tunnel)
Can be chronic (e.g. living nearby a trafficked highway)
Noise
Increases stress hormones
Lower levels of well-being
Extraversion is more tolerant to city noise
Crowding
One may lose personal space
associated with social withdrawal
Associated with stress hormone levels for adults
Poor Housing Quality
Children, adolescents, and adults displayed higher levels of stress hormones
Traffic Congestion
May lead to elevated physiological stress and negative affect
More negative social interactions with their family members at home