Colonism notes
MOORE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
IBUS 544: Colonialism
Introductions
Schedule of topics and brainstorming
Introductory readings
Historical Context of Colonialism
Colonialism was not the initial point of European interests in Africa.
Slavery was a major European business before the colonization period.
Portuguese traders initiated sea exploration around 1300s, traveling south of modern-day Morocco around 1430.
Sought trade routes for commodities like silk and spices.
Discovered a new commodity: slaves.
Atlantic Slave Trade: Began around 1520s and lasted until late 1860s.
Approximately 12.5 million enslaved individuals were taken from Africa.
Roughly 10.7 million were transported to the Americas.
Slavery's Societal Impact
Origins of Mistrust:
Initial slave capturing involved organized state raids and warfare.
As trade developed, insecurity led individuals to betray others (friends/family) through kidnapping and deceit.
Notable references:
Sigismund Wilhelm Koelle (1854)
P. E. H. Hair (1965)
Charles Piot (1996)
Establishment of Settlements
The settlement at present-day Cape Town was established as a supply station.
The Company Gardens in Cape Town became a popular attraction.
The Dutch East India Company was the first to establish a settlement in Southern Africa (1652).
The Colonial Era
Colonial Period Duration: Less than a century, primarily focused on the era post-1884.
Congress of Berlin (1884): A pivotal moment that initiated the Scramble for Africa.
Organization of African Unity (OAU): Played a crucial role in post-colonial independence movements beginning in the early 1960s.
Although significant events predated 1884, they are only briefly covered in class.
Map of Colonial Division
Illustration and description of Africa as divided by colonizing powers around 1914.
Key factions include:
Portuguese
Spanish
British
French
Belgian
German
Italian
Colonial Influence: Present on the map as of 1878.
Congress of Berlin Insights
Purpose: European powers convened to divide African territory.
Key inquiries include:
What were the motivations for colonization?
Why was cooperation favored over competition?
Agreements regarding territorial management and the Principle of Effective Occupation.
Investigates how colonial borders (which persist today) were drawn and their implications.
Motivations for Colonialism
Economic Interests
Sources of raw materials essential for the Industrial Revolution:
Cash crops: Cotton (for clothing), cocoa, coffee, rubber (used in tires), palm oil (serves as an industrial lubricant).
Minerals such as gold and silver, ivory, etc.
Colonies served as markets for surplus manufactured goods and helped alleviate unemployment in Europe by purchasing goods from those colonies.
Colonies were integrated into a supply chain, ensuring controlled volume, quality, and pricing.
Colonialism effectively monetized Africa for the colonial powers, creating cash economies and dismantling pre-existing subsistence economies.
Political and Security Interests
Fierce competition for global influence encouraged colonization.
Great Britain: Established as a leading colonial power with territories in India, Australia, and large portions of Africa including Egypt.
The Suez Canal (constructed 1859-1869) enhanced security and operational efficiency for shipping from colonies, linking economic interests.
France aimed to restore its prestige after defeat in the Franco-Prussian War (1871).
Social and Cultural Interests
The “civilizing mission” is frequently cited but is often criticized as a façade for underlying racism and cultural superiority claims.
Beliefs emerged about the superiority of European culture, leading to settler tensions in colonies.
Role of Missionaries: Played an active role rather than being marginal figures, positioning European values against local customs.
Emigration to settler colonies arose as a solution for overpopulation in Europe, especially in countries like Germany and Italy.
Chartered Companies and Treaties
Chartered Companies: Private corporations granted official permissions by home governments for specific geographic regions.
Powers included resource extraction, indigenous governance, and raising militias.
Treaties: Often conducted with indigenous leaders involved trickery and misleading terms.
Commonly, treaties were conducted in European languages that were poorly understood, often misinterpreted as alliances.
Force played a significant role in treaty enforcement and local governance systems, highlighting the disparities in military power.
Conquest Dynamics
Reference to a period poem:
“Whatever happens, we have the Maxim gun and they have not.” This reflects the technological dominance that European colonizers had over indigenous populations.
Governance and Development Models
Different governance strategies displayed variances in their approach to colonial rule:
British Model: Indirect rule through local groups, decentralizing governance.
French Model: Direct administration aimed at assimilating locals into French culture.
Portuguese and Belgian: Known for their oppressive governance styles leading to repression.
Post-colonial impacts: British and French investments in infrastructure contrasted with Belgian and Portuguese legacies of minimal support, causing instability.
British Legacy
Settler colonies maintained decentralized governance, working through local groups to shape political institutions.
Emphasis on stability, but this led to tribal competition.
Substantial investments in infrastructure like roads and railways yielded a well-prepared elite to govern post-independence.
French Legacy
A centralized administration managed directly by relocating French citizens.
Strove for integration into French governance structures with a potential for citizenship.
Efforts created trained leaders but resulted in significant inequality post-independence with a single ruling party dominating.
Portuguese Legacy
Colonies: Angola, Mozambique, Guinea, Cape Verde, Sao Tome and Principe characterized by severe repression.
None of the colonies allowed for local governance, producing a vacuum after independence due to lack of skills in managing the installed cash economy.
Belgian Congo
Infamous for the exploitative and brutal conditions under King Leopold II’s rule with a primary focus on rubber cultivation.
Minimal investment in governance or infrastructure, creating further challenges during the colonial period.
Liberia's Historical Context
Pre-Civil War scene involved significant relocation of free-born Africans from the U.S. and the Caribbean facilitated by the American Colonization Society.
The settlers, known as Americo-Liberians, clashed violently with indigenous groups.
Declared independence in 1847 and exploited for its resources such as iron ore and palm oil.
Firestone's establishment of the largest rubber plantation (1926) highlights the economic exploitation prevalent during colonialism.
Notable Colonial Abuses
Unique case of Namibia: Transitioned from a German colony post-WWI to administrative control by the League of Nations and then South Africa until 1990.
The 'White Man's Burden'
Poem by Rudyard Kipling:
Takes a critical lens on Western imperialism and foreign aid practices, trapping nations in cycles of dependency and portraying the burden of civilizing efforts.
Independence Movements of the 1960s
Factors contributing to national independence post-WWII explored.
The Organization of African Unity (OAU) created in 1963 aimed to support independence.
Notable independence leaders:
Kwame Nkrumah (Ghana)
Julius Nyerere (Tanzania)
Haile Selassie (Ethiopia)
Evaluation of the effectiveness and criticisms of the OAU’s policy of non-intervention in member states.
Legacy of Colonialism: Tribalism and Corruption
Examination of how colonial powers played ethnic groups against each other, leading to enduring tribal rivalries post-independence.
The legacy of underinvestment in local institutions created vacuums for governance.
Economic and educational inequalities during colonialism resulted in concentrated power among local elites post-independence.
Power Dynamics: Big Men and Patronage Politics
Dominance of one-party states leads to:
Weak state structures and reliance on informal operations.
Personal rule and decision-making by individuals.
Patronage systems that allocate state resources to selected groups without an ideological foundation.
Emergence of predatory regimes that exploit businesses through arbitrary regulations and practices.