The Research Process and Conducting Market Research for International Business
Fundamentals of Knowledge Acquisition and International Market Research
Role of Objective Fact-Finding: Objective fact-finding serves as the primary mechanism to address managerial information needs and accumulate organizational knowledge.
Internal vs. External Knowledge Sources:
Internal Knowledge: Acquired through internal processes, leveraging accumulated experience, memory, and insights of firm employees.
External Knowledge: Acquired through systematic investigation of market conditions, consumer behavior, and competitor actions.
Organizational Complexity and Research Scope:
Beginner Firms: Focus research on a broad spectrum of foundational market issues.
Experienced Firms: Investigate highly complex, specific operational issues, such as foreign direct investment locations for manufacturing, research and development (R&D) facilities, and customized product offerings.
Case Example: Volkswagen (VW) U.S. Market Research:
Objective: Increase U.S. sales, gain competitive intelligence, set target objectives, and design localized vehicles.
Methodology: A team of researchers lived in the United States for months, traveling across diverse consumer hubs including the Mall of America, the Coca-Cola museum, a rodeo, a drag race, and Florida beaches during spring break.
Field Study: Tried all modes of domestic transport (subways, rental cars, red-eye flights) and drove a competitor vehicle every week.
Findings: Learned distinct American driver preferences—high demand for ample storage space, quality audio speakers, using vehicles to transport family members to social/lunch events, and viewing cars as expressions of personal independence.
Core Goal of Marketing Research:
To acquire deep understanding of specific operational or strategic problems with minimal error.
Example (Kellogg): When introducing a new breakfast cereal, research addresses market absorption capabilities, differentiation (e.g., healthy living, fitness promotion), consumer targeting/profiling, and precise sales forecasting while minimizing judgment errors.
The Five-Step International Market Research Process
Step 1: Identify the Problem:
Define the exact purpose, scope, boundaries, and specific questions to be answered.
Frame foundational inquiries:
What information is already known?
What specific knowledge needs to be acquired?
What primary and secondary sources must be utilized?
How will the gathered data be analyzed, reported, and applied to managerial decisions?
Establishes project urgency, goals, and alignment among managers and stakeholders.
Step 2: Select an Appropriate Research Design:
Select measurement scales, survey instruments, and target sampling frames (e.g., urban families with children living at home).
Ensure external validity by choosing representative samples whose findings generalize across target markets.
Formulate hypotheses to test specific research questions.
Step 3: Collect Data:
Gather high-quality, relevant data starting with secondary research and progressing to primary research as questions narrow.
Primary Data Methods: Direct observation, field experiments, structured surveys, focus groups, trade fairs, and trade missions.
Critical Challenge: Data accuracy in international markets is crucial; flawed data produces invalid conclusions.
Step 4: Analyze and Interpret the Data:
The most difficult step, requiring experience and insight to translate raw inputs into strategic managerial recommendations.
Sophistication ranges from qualitative content categorization to advanced quantitative statistical modeling.
Key Methodological Parameters: Access, representativeness, reliability, validity, translation equivalence, and measurement equivalence.
Software Tools: Specialized statistical software packages such as SPSS and SAS are utilized for tabulation and cross-sectional modeling.
Step 5: Report the Findings:
Deliver a clear, actionable written report and presentation outlining results and managerial guidance.
Structure information efficiently to prevent cognitive overload among senior executives.
Outputs include periodic updates or one-time strategic briefings that justify specific capital allocations and market strategies.
Comprehensive Application: Acme Motor Company (AMC) Market Entry Study
Strategic Scenario:
Acme Motor Company (AMC), a U.S. automaker, seeks to introduce its "Cruiser" line of inexpensive, fuel-efficient cars (priced under \\text{\\$10,000}) into Europe.
Market Entry Plan: Target France first to refine marketing strategies prior to regional expansion.
Competitive Dynamics: Indian automaker Tata Motors simultaneously announced plans to launch its low-cost, fuel-efficient subcompact "Nano" in France and other European markets.
Problem Identification Framework:
Identify target French consumer market segments for the Cruiser.
Determine positioning strategies to maximize profits within .
Achieve a minimum market share of in France within .
Assess French perception of U.S. automotive brands and devise tactics to counter negative biases.
Determine preferred vehicular features, consumer values, beliefs, and buying behavior.
Profile existing competing brands and establish differentiation criteria against the Tata Nano.
Establish optimal tactical pricing and localized advertising campaigns.
Determine the optimal balance between standardization and adaptation across European markets.
Standardization versus Adaptation Dynamics:
Standardization: Selling uniform products with standardized pricing, distribution, and promotion minimizes operational costs.
Adaptation: Modifying elements to local norms (e.g., translating owner manuals into French, adjusting price levels to local purchasing power).
Research Design Execution:
Secondary Phase: Review existing literature on French buying behavior.
Primary Survey Design: Construct a French-language survey targeting constructs such as "attitude toward American cars," "meaning of car ownership," and personal values.
Scale Selection: Adapt internal U.S. survey scales, utilize standardized industry scales from the Handbook of Marketing Scales (Bearden & Netemeyer, 1999), and conduct qualitative interviews with French drivers to create new scales.
Equivalence Controls: Hire a local French research firm to handle translation, back-translation, and validation checks to preserve measurement equivalence.
Data Collection Logistics:
Secondary Sources: Gather data from libraries, government publications, online databases, and syndicated automotive market reports.
Primary Sampling Frame: Purchase contact records for French consumers who bought an economy car within the last .
Sample Size: Draw a random sample of consumers.
Response Expectation: Anticipate a response rate ( completed surveys), yielding statistically valid and representative data under sampling theory.
Malady Controls: Control for frame errors, sampling errors, and non-response bias.
Data Analysis & Interpretation Steps:
Data Cleaning: Eliminate incomplete, inaccurate, or dishonest survey submissions.
Software Analysis: Run analytical models via SPSS or SAS.
Cross-Tabulation: Analyze cross-tabs to identify underlying relationships between variables.
Correlation Analysis: Measure association between purchase intent and features (e.g., legroom, air conditioning, transmission type).
Causation Analysis: Determine direction and magnitude of impact exerted by independent variables (car attributes) on the dependent variable (purchase likelihood).
Reliability Threshold: Evaluate construct consistency using Cronbach's Alpha, requiring a minimum index value of ().
Reporting Execution:
Present quantitative findings using charts, tables, and visual graphics.
Code and categorize qualitative findings into structured thematic groupings.
Case Study in Research Failure: The Coca-Cola "New Coke" Flaw
Context & Strategic Decision:
Facing declining market share, Coca-Cola attempted to reformulate its core beverage, launching "New Coke" on April 23, 1985, and removing original Coke from the market.
Decision was based on blind taste tests showing consumers preferred a sweeter formula over original Coke and Pepsi, leading executives to assume consumers would not miss original Coke.
Market Backlash & Chronology:
post-launch: Brand awareness reached a vast majority of the U.S. population.
Initial Metric: May 1985 surveys indicated consumer approval for New Coke.
Crisis Development: Over the next , tens of thousands of angry communications inundated Atlanta headquarters, boycotts were organized, class-action lawsuits were planned, and product stockpiling/scalping emerged.
Public Sentiment Decline: By July 1985, consumer approval plunged to .
Reversal: Less than after launch, Coca-Cola reinstated the original formula, driving company stock to a high on Wall Street.
Methodological Flaws & Root Causes:
Choice Architecture Error: Taste tests failed to inform participants that choosing the new flavor meant the permanent loss of the original formula.
Sample Sub-Selection Error: Out of total taste-test participants, only were tested on the specific New Coke formula.
Construct Definition Failure: Research evaluated physical product taste in isolation, completely failing to define or measure emotional ties, patriotic connection, nostalgia, and brand heritage built over .
Demographic Misalignment: Sweeter formulation appealed primarily to younger consumers while deeply alienating older core demographics.
Strategic Insights for Researchers:
Market research cannot replace executive intuition, judgment, and situational awareness.
Data must be synthesized with contextual nuance; market research functions as much as an art as a science.