communication studies class 12
Text (in broadest sense)
example: paintings, music, prayer, poetry, statues, pictures, hair, style
all (cultural) forms implying giving meaning
all artefacts and practices that give meaning/are meaningful
read cultural products and social practices as texts (textual analysis)
reveal oppression in texts
polysemy
meaning produced in contact of text and reader (different readings of text)
moment of consumption = meaningful production
meaning negotiable and constructed
study reception of media texts
→ production and consumption of media messages is an active and interpretative undertaking
→ encoding-decoding according to Hall = structured polysemy
cultural studies: research program (recap)
→ linguistic/cultural turn
elitist to popular, everyday practices, texts
from production over text (incl. social power relations) to consumption (decoding): signifying practices instead of uniform meanings and reception
attention to micropolitics of power, countering economic reductionism and emphasis on macropolitics of power
from a largely passive audience to an active audience
focus on superstructure which has its own autonomy, instead of all-determining base models
structure but with certain freedom
qualitative research
contribution to unmask ideology and liberate oppression of subjects of repressive powers (political commitment)
extended view on culture: beyond high and low, toward popular culture, everyday cultural practices, ‘living culture’
dominant cultural hierarchy = dominant political and social-economic hierarchy
identification and analysis of popular culture which serves the existing order (e.g. soaps) and look for alternative aspects within popular culture (e.g. subculture)
qualitative research: textual analysis, reception studies, ethnographic research…
critiques
too textualist: media artifacts and cultural practices texts to be read rather than institutions to be analyzed
too focused on reception and micropolitics of power, the power of the ordinary
overly theoretical, jargon
relativist (postmodernism), infinite plasticity, obscuring instead of illuminating
particularistic, romanticizing and impressionistic
quit initial goal to reveal power structures (lost sight of initial goals)
legitimation of capitalism
conformist → political dead end?
post-approaches
poststructuralism - différance (Derrida)
différance: 2 parts
difference between words and signs gives meaning (difference)
words and signs never signify immediately and unambiguously; their meaning depends on words and signs that follow (delay of meaning → deferral)
no stable, nor determing structure in meaning
meaning is fluid and in transformation
production of meaning via signifying practices is dynamic and unpredictable, no fixed meaning
encoding understood as dictating meaning is near impossible
poststructuralism - intertextuality
Kristeva: intertextuality
horizontal relation text - reader
vertical relation text - other text(s)
Fiske: horizontal and vertical intertextuality
horizontal: media text relates to other media texts in terms of content/genre
vertical: media text relates to other texts deriving from the same source
meaning is not only in the text itself, but is layered and developed in relation to other texts and meanings
(indefinite) network of texts interpreted by authors/readers
→ dialogue between communicator and receiver → instability and fluidity of meaning
poststructuralism - foucault and discourse
representation: production of knowledge via discourse
discourse = amalgamation (action/process/result of combining/unifying) of language and practices that constructs and regulates knowledge and meaning about a topic at a certain moment in time
discourse
sets boundaries on how we can think and talk about things meaningfully
consists of language and practices (totality of discourse)
regulates bagavior and action
determines social agents
no meaning outside of discourse: discourse produces knowledge
discursive formation: patterns in texts and (discursive) practices in society in terms of object, style and strategy
discourse,r epresentation, knowledge and ‘truth’ are always context-dependent, both historically and culturally
→ anti-essentialism: words or social categories have no stable referents, nor one particular ‘essence’
→ no truth, subject or identity outside of language or discourse
→ language/discourse are unstable (Derrida) and historically contingent (Foucault)
→ discursive constructions ↔ fixed texts or media messages