ENV201 W 1 - 8
WEEK 1 — FOUNDATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Environmental management focuses on decision-making about human interactions with the environment.
Environmental management involves trade-offs between environmental, social, and economic goals.
Environmental management operates under uncertainty, complexity, and conflict.
Socio-ecological systems
Socio-ecological systems are systems where human and ecological components are interconnected.
Human actions affect ecosystems, and ecosystem changes affect human systems.
Sustainability
Sustainability means meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.
Sustainable development
Sustainable development integrates environmental protection, social well-being, and economic development.
Models of sustainability
The three-legged stool model treats environment, society, and economy as equally important.
The nested systems model places the economy inside society and society inside the environment.
Weak sustainability
Weak sustainability assumes natural capital can be substituted with human or manufactured capital.
Environmental damage is acceptable if compensated elsewhere.
Strong sustainability
Strong sustainability assumes some natural capital is irreplaceable.
Certain ecosystems must be protected regardless of economic trade-offs.
Wicked problems
Wicked problems have no single definition or solution.
Wicked problems involve uncertainty, complexity, change, and conflict.
Environmental problems are considered wicked problems.
WEEK 2 — ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT & ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Ecosystem management
Ecosystem management is a holistic approach to managing ecosystems.
Ecosystem management considers entire ecosystems rather than single species.
Humans are considered part of ecosystems.
Ecosystems are dynamic and complex.
Management occurs across multiple spatial and temporal scales.
Ecosystem management involves values and choices.
Ecosystem services
Ecosystem services are benefits that humans receive from ecosystems.
Types of ecosystem services
Provisioning services include food, water, timber, and raw materials.
Regulating services include climate regulation, flood control, and water purification.
Cultural services include recreation, aesthetic value, and spiritual benefits.
Supporting services include soil formation, nutrient cycling, and habitat provision.
Importance of ecosystem services
Ecosystem services help justify environmental protection.
Ecosystem services make environmental benefits visible in decision-making.
Banff National Park
Banff illustrates conflicts between conservation, tourism, and development.
Single-species management caused unintended consequences.
Management shifted toward ecosystem-based approaches.
Banff shows the importance of cumulative impacts.
WEEK 3 — ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT & RESILIENCE
Traditional management
Traditional management assumes certainty and predictability.
Traditional management often fails in complex environmental systems.
Adaptive management
Adaptive management treats policies as experiments.
Adaptive management emphasizes learning by doing.
Adaptive management involves ongoing monitoring and adjustment.
Adaptive management cycle
Set goals
Implement policy
Monitor outcomes
Evaluate results
Adjust management
Passive adaptive management
Passive adaptive management uses one strategy and adjusts over time.
Passive adaptive management involves lower risk and lower learning.
Active adaptive management
Active adaptive management tests multiple strategies simultaneously.
Active adaptive management generates more learning but higher risk.
Conditions for success
Clear objectives
Effective monitoring
Institutional flexibility
Willingness to change decisions
Long-term commitment
Resilience
Resilience is the ability of a system to absorb disturbance and recover.
Resilience focuses on adaptation to change.
Difference between resilience and sustainability
Sustainability focuses on long-term maintenance.
Resilience focuses on response to shocks.
Columbia River Basin
The Columbia River Basin illustrates large-scale adaptive management.
Multiple stakeholders and jurisdictions complicate management.
Adaptive management had partial success.
WEEK 4 — GOVERNANCE & STAKEHOLDERS
Governance
Governance refers to how decisions are made and implemented.
Governance includes governments, institutions, laws, and informal rules.
Governance continuum
Top-down governance involves centralized decision-making.
Shared governance involves collaboration among actors.
Bottom-up governance involves local or community control.
Stakeholders
Stakeholders are individuals or groups that affect or are affected by decisions.
Stakeholders may include governments, NGOs, communities, and industry.
Benefits of stakeholder inclusion
Improves decision quality
Increases legitimacy
Builds trust
Reduces conflict
Costs of stakeholder inclusion
Power imbalances
Increased time and cost
Capacity limitations
Conflict
Timing of inclusion
Early inclusion allows meaningful influence.
Late inclusion often results in tokenism.
Dzanga–Sangha
Dzanga–Sangha conservation excluded local communities.
Exclusion weakened long-term governance outcomes.
Conflict resolution
Top-down approaches include political and judicial mechanisms.
Bottom-up approaches include negotiation and mediation.
WEEK 5 — CO-MANAGEMENT & SHARED GOVERNANCE
Co-management
Co-management involves shared authority between governments and non-government actors.
Co-management often includes Indigenous communities.
Weak co-management
Government retains most decision-making power.
Community involvement is limited.
Strong co-management
Decision-making power is shared or delegated.
Communities have meaningful authority.
Benefits of co-management
Incorporates local and traditional knowledge.
Improves legitimacy and compliance.
Reduces conflict.
Challenges of co-management
Power imbalances
Differing values
Capacity constraints
Slower decision-making
Indigenous co-management
Recognizes Indigenous rights and knowledge.
Addresses historical exclusion.
Supports environmental justice.
WEEK 6 — ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Environmental Impact Assessment
EIA is a decision-making process used before project approval.
EIA identifies, predicts, evaluates, and mitigates environmental impacts.
When EIA is used
Projects
Activities
Policies and plans (strategic EIA)
Types of impact assessment
Environmental
Social
Ecological
Technological
EIA process
Proposal
Screening
Scoping
Impact assessment
Mitigation
Decision
Implementation and monitoring
Best practices
Legal foundation
Public participation
Consideration of cumulative impacts
Monitoring and enforcement
Limitations of EIA
Political influence
Data uncertainty
Weak monitoring
Rafferty–Alameda Dam
Court decision strengthened EIA requirements.
All environmental impacts must be considered.
WEEK 7 — COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS & LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
CBA compares monetary costs and benefits of policies.
CBA is used for regulations and policy decisions.
CBA steps
Assign monetary values
Discount future costs and benefits
Compare totals
Discounting
Discounting converts future values into present values.
High discount rates reduce the importance of future impacts.
Strengths of CBA
Encourages efficiency
Allows comparison of options
Limitations of CBA
Ethical concerns
Difficulty valuing nature and life
Favors present over future
Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA)
LCA evaluates environmental impacts of products from cradle to grave.
LCA stages
Resource extraction
Manufacturing
Transportation
Use
Disposal or recycling
Strengths of LCA
Identifies hidden impacts
Avoids impact shifting
Limitations of LCA
Data intensive
Does not include social impacts
WEEK 8 — ACCOUNTING TOOLS & VALUATION
Accounting tools
Accounting tools measure overall environmental impacts.
Accounting tools support monitoring and evaluation.
Examples of accounting tools
Ecological footprints
GHG inventories
Triple Bottom Line accounting
Decision tools vs accounting tools
Decision tools evaluate specific choices.
Accounting tools measure aggregate impacts.
Valuing nature
Monetary valuation can support decision-making.
Not all environmental values can be monetized.
Ecological footprint
Measures land and water required to support consumption.
Does not capture toxicity or ecosystem health well.