HACCP & Allergen Management Comprehensive Study Notes
HACCP Fundamentals
Meaning of HACCP
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
Science-based, preventive system that identifies, evaluates and controls hazards significant to food safety at critical points in the supply chain
Legal definition per Philippine Food Safety Act of 2013
Single-word associations raised in class: danger, control, safety, prevention, quality, system, education
Food Safety & Quality Pyramid (Figure 1)
Base = Management Commitment + Prerequisite Programs (GMP, SSOP, GHP)
Middle = Continuous Training / Education
Apex = HACCP
Continuous Quality Improvement overlays the entire pyramid
HACCP acronym dissected
Hazard → danger to health
Analysis → investigation of the hazard
Critical → crucial for containment
Control → handling of conditions
Points → position in the process
Historical Milestones
– NASA, US Army Labs & Pillsbury begin work on food safety for space missions ("zero defects")
– Pillsbury formally adopts “CCP” system (5 principles)
– 1st National Conference for Food Protection; CCP concept publicized
– US FDA inspectors trained by Pillsbury (“Food Safety through HACCP”)
– US National Academy of Sciences recommends HACCP for all regulators
– NACMCF publishes revised HACCP guidance (7 principles)
– Codex Alimentarius adopts first HACCP guidelines; EU makes HACCP legal (Directive 93/43/EEC); major Jack-in-the-Box E.coli outbreak & UK BSE crisis
– USDA Pathogen Reduction/HACCP rule for meat & poultry
– Codex HACCP revision: stresses PRP management & training
– Codex “General Principles of Food Hygiene” Rev. 5: adds Food Safety Culture, updates terminology, decision tree, preliminary steps
Codex 2020 Key Changes
Introduction of food-safety culture
Defined as “shared values, beliefs and norms affecting mind-set & behaviour toward food safety across and throughout an organisation”
Elements: Management commitment; leadership; personnel awareness; open communication; adequate resources
10 new terms (acceptable level, allergen cross-contact, competent authority, food business operator, food hygiene system, GHPs, HACCP system, PRP, significant hazard, validation)
Expanded definitions (contaminant, control measure, CCP, critical limit, deviation, etc.)
Training & competence explicitly required; working instructions must support HACCP; retraining linked to corrective actions
Updated Codex Decision Tree: four-question flow to determine CCPs (Q1–Q4)
Legal & Regulatory Imperatives
RA 10611 (Food Safety Act) – Article IX §31(a): MSMEs must be trained in HACCP, GHP, technologies
Administrative Order 153 s-2004: cGMP mandatory prerequisite; revised guidelines for food manufacturing
Multiple importing countries require HACCP certification; EU & USDA rules cited
Cost–Benefit of HACCP vs Conventional QC
Conventional: inspect finished product → high rejection, shipment holds, late detection
HACCP: control during process → anticipates problems, flexible, efficient resource use, supports trade, eases inspection (WHO-ICD 1999)
Relationship Map
Prerequisite layer: GHP/GMP & SSOP
Assurance layer: HACCP Plan (food safety)
Quality layer: QACP / ISO 9000 (quality)
Cultural / managerial layer: TQM
Prerequisite Programs (PPs)
Must be fully implemented and verified before HACCP: GMP, SSOP, pest control, sanitation, calibration, traceability, recall, preventive maintenance, personnel hygiene, allergen management, etc.
Provide “basic environmental & operating conditions” (Codex 2020)
The 12 Codex Steps (5 Prelim + 7 Principles)
Assemble HACCP team & define scope
Describe product (composition, pH/aw, packaging, shelf life, distribution)
Identify intended use & consumers
Construct flow diagram
On-site confirmation of flow diagram
Principle 1 – Conduct hazard analysis & identify control measures
Principle 2 – Determine CCPs
Principle 3 – Establish validated critical limits
Principle 4 – Set up monitoring system
Principle 5 – Define corrective actions
Principle 6 – Validate & verify HACCP plan
Principle 7 – Establish documentation & record-keeping
Codex CCP Decision Tree (2022)
Q1 – Can hazard be controlled by PRPs (GHP)? → If Yes: not a CCP
Q2 – Do specific control measures exist at this step? → If No: not a CCP, evaluate next step
Q3 – Will a later step control hazard to acceptable level? → If Yes: that later step is CCP
Q4 – Can this step itself control hazard? → If Yes: CCP; if No: modify process
Example Application – Crispy Pilinut with Honey (JEP)
Team Composition
Internal Food Safety Auditor - Carlota R. Legaspi - Food Safety Consultant
НАССР Team Leader - Twinnee B. Pante - Technical Operations Manager
НАССР Team Members
Maria Angelika P. Lomibao - Operations Manager
Linard I. Carique - Production Supervisor
Jesus Olin Jr. - Sales and Marketing Manager
Imee Jane Navarro - HR Manager
Ruel S. Banglo - FG & Warehouse Manager
Mary Joy Robles - QA/QC Specialist
Mecy Relleve - QA/QC Specialist
Alyssa Ruiz - Raw Materials, Supply and Inventory Officer
Process Flow (simplified)
Raw nut receipt & inspection
Sorting
Deep-frying / Roasting / Dehydration (depending on SKU)
Cooling
Honey coating
Magnetizing
Filling & MAP packing
Boxing & palletizing
Storage & distribution
Identified CCPs & Critical Limits
CCP | Step | Hazard | Critical Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
CCP-1B | Deep-frying | Pathogens (E.coli, Salmonella, coliforms, S. aureus) | Deep- frying time and temperature is achieved (100 °С minimum for 13-17 minutes) |
CCP-1B | Roasting | Same pathogens | Roasting time and temperature is achieved (138 °C or 280°F minimum, for 5-10 minutes) |
CCP-1B | Dehydration | Same pathogens | Dehydrating time and temperature is achieved (65°C minimum, for 20-22 hours) |
CCP-2P | Magnetizing | Physical – metal fragments | Presence and Absence of foreign materials with 0.3" (7 mm) to 1.0" (25 mm) in length |
Monitoring (examples)
Deep-frying: cook records temp via calibrated probe each batch, logs time ≥
Roasting: thermometer & oven gauge read after
Dehydration: thermometer & gauge read every
Magnetizing: visual check 5×/batch before filling
Corrective Actions (sample – Deep-frying)
If temp <: extend cooking; inspect fuel & burner; recalibrate/replace thermometer; retrain staff
Verification & Records
Weekly internal calibration; annual 3rd-party calibration
CCP monitoring forms, production log, lab test results, validation studies (per PNS/FDA 29:2010) retained
Allergen Management
Food Allergy Basics
IgE-mediated reaction; next exposure triggers histamine → symptoms; can progress to anaphylaxis (shock, airway constriction) needing epinephrine
Mild symptoms: hives, itching, GI upset, rhinitis
Severe symptoms: swelling of lips/throat, wheeze, BP drop, chest pain, loss of consciousness
Cross-Contact
Residual allergen unintentionally incorporated
Raw material cross-contact – shared harvest/storage/packaging
Processing – shared lines, equipment, tools, personnel
Major Allergens (global)
"Big 9" USA: milk, eggs, fish, crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, soybeans, sesame
Additional common/regional: celery, mustard, lupin, molluscs, sulphites, buckwheat, latex, etc.
International regulatory chart (FARRP) maps country-specific mandatory declarations
Symptoms & Prevalence
of children ≤4 y; of adults
Onset: minutes → hours post-ingestion
Systems affected: skin, GI, respiratory, cardiovascular
Allergen Control Program (ACP)
Four “anatomical” pillars
Information & Mapping – identify allergenic ingredients, flow, CPPs
Procedures/Work Instructions – segregation, scheduling, cleaning
Management Commitment – policies, resources, leadership
Records – evidence of diligence (specs, training, cleaning, audits)
Key Risk-Management Areas
People
Mandatory training at induction + annual refresh; cover allergen recognition, handwashing, PPE, rework, cleaning, traffic flow
Dedicated workwear where high cross-contact risk; no personal food in processing zones
Visitors/contractors guided by host, comply with GMP
Suppliers & Raw Materials
Obtain full allergen status/specifications; review compound ingredients; demand notification of changes
Assess packaging materials (e.g., wheat-based release agents)
Emergency suppliers require testing & approval
Incoming inspection: intact containers, lot codes, supervised unloading; questionable loads rejected
Segregation: mark allergen pallets, bottom-rack storage, distinct lot tracking
Equipment & Plant Design
Shared equipment must be cleanable & validated; minimise dead spots
Allergen clean: remove dust bags, use low-air cleaning, validate swab/ELISA or ATP + specific protein kits; set acceptable residue limits (e.g., <)
Manufacturing Controls
Internal labels for WIP & semis; checklist before using similar-looking packaging
Pre-start-up and changeover line clearance; automated label verification
Rework containing allergens: controlled, same allergen profile, documented
Documentation & Verification
Maintain risk assessments, validation reports, cleaning records, training logs, complaints analysis
Internal audits verify compliance; review whenever:
New ingredients/processes
Equipment/site change
Regulatory updates
Significant incidents
Communication to Consumers
Accurate label declaration of deliberate ingredients + precautionary ("may contain…") when scientifically justified
Point-of-sale, websites, spec sheets, customer orientation
Validation & Review
Clean-in-place/clean-out-of-place validation proves allergen removal to acceptable limit
Verification = routine monitoring (swabs, visual, protein tests)
Review frequency tied to change or at least annually
Summary Take-aways
HACCP = proactive, systematic, science-based food-safety management anchored on PRPs & backed by culture
12-step Codex methodology + updated decision tree guide practical implementation
Legal, economic & trade drivers make HACCP training/certification mandatory in many jurisdictions
Real-world Pilinut case illustrates development of product description, flow diagram, CCPs, limits, monitoring, corrective, verification & records
Allergen control integrates with HACCP through hazard analysis, PRPs, dedicated ACP, and clear communication to protect consumers & business