HACCP & Allergen Management Comprehensive Study Notes

HACCP Fundamentals

  • Meaning of HACCP

    • Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points

    • Science-based, preventive system that identifies, evaluates and controls hazards significant to food safety at critical points in the supply chain

    • Legal definition per Philippine Food Safety Act of 2013

  • Single-word associations raised in class: danger, control, safety, prevention, quality, system, education

  • Food Safety & Quality Pyramid (Figure 1)

    • Base = Management Commitment + Prerequisite Programs (GMP, SSOP, GHP)

    • Middle = Continuous Training / Education

    • Apex = HACCP

    • Continuous Quality Improvement overlays the entire pyramid

  • HACCP acronym dissected

    • Hazard → danger to health

    • Analysis → investigation of the hazard

    • Critical → crucial for containment

    • Control → handling of conditions

    • Points → position in the process

Historical Milestones

  • 19591959 – NASA, US Army Labs & Pillsbury begin work on food safety for space missions ("zero defects")

  • 19641964 – Pillsbury formally adopts “CCP” system (5 principles)

  • 19711971 – 1st National Conference for Food Protection; CCP concept publicized

  • 19721972 – US FDA inspectors trained by Pillsbury (“Food Safety through HACCP”)

  • 19851985 – US National Academy of Sciences recommends HACCP for all regulators

  • 19921992 – NACMCF publishes revised HACCP guidance (7 principles)

  • 19931993 – Codex Alimentarius adopts first HACCP guidelines; EU makes HACCP legal (Directive 93/43/EEC); major Jack-in-the-Box E.coli outbreak & UK BSE crisis

  • 19961996 – USDA Pathogen Reduction/HACCP rule for meat & poultry

  • 20032003 – Codex HACCP revision: stresses PRP management & training

  • 20202020 – Codex “General Principles of Food Hygiene” Rev. 5: adds Food Safety Culture, updates terminology, decision tree, preliminary steps

Codex 2020 Key Changes

  • Introduction of food-safety culture

    • Defined as “shared values, beliefs and norms affecting mind-set & behaviour toward food safety across and throughout an organisation”

    • Elements: Management commitment; leadership; personnel awareness; open communication; adequate resources

  • 10 new terms (acceptable level, allergen cross-contact, competent authority, food business operator, food hygiene system, GHPs, HACCP system, PRP, significant hazard, validation)

  • Expanded definitions (contaminant, control measure, CCP, critical limit, deviation, etc.)

  • Training & competence explicitly required; working instructions must support HACCP; retraining linked to corrective actions

  • Updated Codex Decision Tree: four-question flow to determine CCPs (Q1–Q4)

Legal & Regulatory Imperatives

  • RA 10611 (Food Safety Act) – Article IX §31(a): MSMEs must be trained in HACCP, GHP, technologies

  • Administrative Order 153 s-2004: cGMP mandatory prerequisite; revised guidelines for food manufacturing

  • Multiple importing countries require HACCP certification; EU & USDA rules cited

Cost–Benefit of HACCP vs Conventional QC

  • Conventional: inspect finished product → high rejection, shipment holds, late detection

  • HACCP: control during process → anticipates problems, flexible, efficient resource use, supports trade, eases inspection (WHO-ICD 1999)

Relationship Map

  • Prerequisite layer: GHP/GMP & SSOP

  • Assurance layer: HACCP Plan (food safety)

  • Quality layer: QACP / ISO 9000 (quality)

  • Cultural / managerial layer: TQM

Prerequisite Programs (PPs)

  • Must be fully implemented and verified before HACCP: GMP, SSOP, pest control, sanitation, calibration, traceability, recall, preventive maintenance, personnel hygiene, allergen management, etc.

  • Provide “basic environmental & operating conditions” (Codex 2020)

The 12 Codex Steps (5 Prelim + 7 Principles)

  1. Assemble HACCP team & define scope

  2. Describe product (composition, pH/aw, packaging, shelf life, distribution)

  3. Identify intended use & consumers

  4. Construct flow diagram

  5. On-site confirmation of flow diagram

  6. Principle 1 – Conduct hazard analysis & identify control measures

  7. Principle 2 – Determine CCPs

  8. Principle 3 – Establish validated critical limits

  9. Principle 4 – Set up monitoring system

  10. Principle 5 – Define corrective actions

  11. Principle 6 – Validate & verify HACCP plan

  12. Principle 7 – Establish documentation & record-keeping

Codex CCP Decision Tree (2022)

  • Q1 – Can hazard be controlled by PRPs (GHP)? → If Yes: not a CCP

  • Q2 – Do specific control measures exist at this step? → If No: not a CCP, evaluate next step

  • Q3 – Will a later step control hazard to acceptable level? → If Yes: that later step is CCP

  • Q4 – Can this step itself control hazard? → If Yes: CCP; if No: modify process

Example Application – Crispy Pilinut with Honey (JEP)

Team Composition

  • Internal Food Safety Auditor - Carlota R. Legaspi - Food Safety Consultant

  • НАССР Team Leader - Twinnee B. Pante - Technical Operations Manager

  • НАССР Team Members

    • Maria Angelika P. Lomibao - Operations Manager

    • Linard I. Carique - Production Supervisor

    • Jesus Olin Jr. - Sales and Marketing Manager

    • Imee Jane Navarro - HR Manager

    • Ruel S. Banglo - FG & Warehouse Manager

    • Mary Joy Robles - QA/QC Specialist

    • Mecy Relleve - QA/QC Specialist

    • Alyssa Ruiz - Raw Materials, Supply and Inventory Officer

Process Flow (simplified)

  1. Raw nut receipt & inspection

  2. Sorting

  3. Deep-frying / Roasting / Dehydration (depending on SKU)

  4. Cooling

  5. Honey coating

  6. Magnetizing

  7. Filling & MAP packing

  8. Boxing & palletizing

  9. Storage & distribution

Identified CCPs & Critical Limits

CCP

Step

Hazard

Critical Limit

CCP-1B

Deep-frying

Pathogens (E.coli, Salmonella, coliforms, S. aureus)

Deep- frying time and temperature is achieved (100 °С minimum for 13-17 minutes)

CCP-1B

Roasting

Same pathogens

Roasting time and temperature is achieved (138 °C or 280°F minimum, for 5-10 minutes)

CCP-1B

Dehydration

Same pathogens

Dehydrating time and temperature is achieved (65°C minimum, for 20-22 hours)

CCP-2P

Magnetizing

Physical – metal fragments 0.3′′–1.0′′0.3''–1.0''

Presence and Absence of foreign materials with 0.3" (7 mm) to 1.0" (25 mm) in length

Monitoring (examples)

  • Deep-frying: cook records temp via calibrated probe each batch, logs time ≥13 min13\,\text{min}

  • Roasting: thermometer & oven gauge read after 4–8 min4–8\,\text{min}

  • Dehydration: thermometer & gauge read every 3–4 h3–4\,\text{h}

  • Magnetizing: visual check 5×/batch before filling

Corrective Actions (sample – Deep-frying)

  • If temp <100 ∘!C100\,^{\circ}!C: extend cooking; inspect fuel & burner; recalibrate/replace thermometer; retrain staff

Verification & Records

  • Weekly internal calibration; annual 3rd-party calibration

  • CCP monitoring forms, production log, lab test results, validation studies (per PNS/FDA 29:2010) retained

Allergen Management

Food Allergy Basics

  • IgE-mediated reaction; next exposure triggers histamine → symptoms; can progress to anaphylaxis (shock, airway constriction) needing epinephrine

  • Mild symptoms: hives, itching, GI upset, rhinitis

  • Severe symptoms: swelling of lips/throat, wheeze, BP drop, chest pain, loss of consciousness

Cross-Contact

  • Residual allergen unintentionally incorporated

    • Raw material cross-contact – shared harvest/storage/packaging

    • Processing – shared lines, equipment, tools, personnel

Major Allergens (global)

  • "Big 9" USA: milk, eggs, fish, crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, soybeans, sesame

  • Additional common/regional: celery, mustard, lupin, molluscs, sulphites, buckwheat, latex, etc.

  • International regulatory chart (FARRP) maps country-specific mandatory declarations

Symptoms & Prevalence

  • ≈6–8%\approx6–8\% of children ≤4 y; ≈4%\approx4\% of adults

  • Onset: minutes → hours post-ingestion

  • Systems affected: skin, GI, respiratory, cardiovascular

Allergen Control Program (ACP)

  • Four “anatomical” pillars

    1. Information & Mapping – identify allergenic ingredients, flow, CPPs

    2. Procedures/Work Instructions – segregation, scheduling, cleaning

    3. Management Commitment – policies, resources, leadership

    4. Records – evidence of diligence (specs, training, cleaning, audits)

Key Risk-Management Areas

People
  • Mandatory training at induction + annual refresh; cover allergen recognition, handwashing, PPE, rework, cleaning, traffic flow

  • Dedicated workwear where high cross-contact risk; no personal food in processing zones

  • Visitors/contractors guided by host, comply with GMP

Suppliers & Raw Materials
  • Obtain full allergen status/specifications; review compound ingredients; demand notification of changes

  • Assess packaging materials (e.g., wheat-based release agents)

  • Emergency suppliers require testing & approval

  • Incoming inspection: intact containers, lot codes, supervised unloading; questionable loads rejected

  • Segregation: mark allergen pallets, bottom-rack storage, distinct lot tracking

Equipment & Plant Design
  • Shared equipment must be cleanable & validated; minimise dead spots

  • Allergen clean: remove dust bags, use low-air cleaning, validate swab/ELISA or ATP + specific protein kits; set acceptable residue limits (e.g., <2.5 ppm2.5\,\text{ppm})

Manufacturing Controls
  • Internal labels for WIP & semis; checklist before using similar-looking packaging

  • Pre-start-up and changeover line clearance; automated label verification

  • Rework containing allergens: controlled, same allergen profile, documented

Documentation & Verification
  • Maintain risk assessments, validation reports, cleaning records, training logs, complaints analysis

  • Internal audits verify compliance; review whenever:

    • New ingredients/processes

    • Equipment/site change

    • Regulatory updates

    • Significant incidents

Communication to Consumers
  • Accurate label declaration of deliberate ingredients + precautionary ("may contain…") when scientifically justified

  • Point-of-sale, websites, spec sheets, customer orientation

Validation & Review

  • Clean-in-place/clean-out-of-place validation proves allergen removal to acceptable limit

  • Verification = routine monitoring (swabs, visual, protein tests)

  • Review frequency tied to change or at least annually

Summary Take-aways

  • HACCP = proactive, systematic, science-based food-safety management anchored on PRPs & backed by culture

  • 12-step Codex methodology + updated decision tree guide practical implementation

  • Legal, economic & trade drivers make HACCP training/certification mandatory in many jurisdictions

  • Real-world Pilinut case illustrates development of product description, flow diagram, CCPs, limits, monitoring, corrective, verification & records

  • Allergen control integrates with HACCP through hazard analysis, PRPs, dedicated ACP, and clear communication to protect consumers & business