Describe and evaluate the ethological explanation of aggression. [16 marks]
AO1
what is ethology…
ethology argues that aggression is ritualistic, takes place instead of physical aggression, promotes survival, idea of appeasement strategies
also argues that aggression is innate
IRMs - built-in physiological structures that detect certain environmental stimuli, trigger the start of a FAP
FAPs - sequence of behaviours carried out in response to a specific stimulus
unique
unstoppable (ballistic)
unchanging/stereotyped
universal
unaffected by learning
research from Tinbergen (1951) sticklebacks
AO3
cannot explain cultural differences, Nisbett (1993), homicide greater amongst white males in the south of America than in the north, found it was due to a culture of honour, ehtology cannot account for how simple cultural influences can overcome innate biological traits
FAPs do change with experience and learning, more flexible than fixed, Hunt (1973), many ethologists prefer the term modal action pattern nowadays
Goodall (2010) appeasement strategies do not always work…
can these findings be applied to humans, much more complex, theological ideas too reductionist, do we have a universal aggressive behaviour?
link to !Kung San tribe…