Media Reporting of Crime
Media reporting of crime:
Media reporting of crime focuses on the role of media news agencies
Agenda-setting in the media leads individuals to discuss what has been presented to them
Based upon the decisions of editorial teams in the media selecting what they think is newsworthy
News values:
Galtung and Rune (1970) developed a series of news values that influenced editor's decisions on content
These included dramatisation, immediacy, personalisation, simplification and status
News is therefore selected in order to obtain viewers, rather than inform the population
Crimes such as terrorism and murder more likely to be selected for graphic imagery
Greater emphasis on the Western world due to being culturally more similar
Celebrity or higher-status offences are more likely to be reported
Misrepresentation of crime reporting:
Cumberbatch et al (1995) found that crime reporting made up between 38% - 53% of all news coverage across major media platforms
Williams and Dickinson (1993) found that tabloid coverage of crime was greater than that of broadsheet newspapers
Soothill and Walby (1991) argued that sexual crimes were over-represented in media coverage
Reiner (2010) argued that despite the majority of crime being property-related, this occupies little coverage
Marhia (2008) over-representation of success in sexual assault and attacks by strangers compared to reality
Media and moral panics:
The stigmatisation of minority groups through media discussion of moral panics
Disproportionate time given to knife crime in London compared to other cities in the UK
Focus on crimes by those on benefits reinforces the public perception of 'benefit scroungers'
Impacts of media reporting:
Reinforces stereotypical views of minority groups which leads to further marginalisation
Increases fear of crime - Gerbner and Gross found that increased consumption of media led to increased fear of crime
Reinforcing ideas of who is the victim of crime and reasserting control through positivist victimology