The Judicial Branch
No age limit
No residency requirement
No citizenship requirement
Life term limit
Federal judges are appointed by the president and approved by the Senate
Senatorial Courtesy— “Recommendation” from the senators of a state regarding a federal judge of a state, asking their opinion on the judge’s qualifications
Litmus Test— Measuring a judge’s personal opinion on different matters to see if they will be able to listen to facts over their own opinions
Judicial Review— The power of the judiciary to examine and, if necessary, invalidate actions undertaken by the legislative and executive branches if deemed unconstitutional or unlawful
Not explicitly stated in the Constitution
John Marshall set the precdent of judicial review through the SCOTUS ruling Marbury v. Madison
Can review:
Acts of Congress (and can remove certain parts of a law)
State actions that are against the Constitution (Supremacy Clause)
Presidential power (executive orders)
Federal agency protections (bureaucracies)
Jurisdiction— The power to make legal decisions and judgements
Dual court system, state and federal courts
Original Jurisdiction— A court’s power to be the first to hear a case
Appellate Jurisdiction— A court’s power to review a case appealed from a lower court
Federal Court Jurisdiction— Federal cases (US matters) and diversity cases (involving citizens from two or more states)
Created by Congress for specialized purposes
US Claims Courts
Original jurisdiction in claims agaisnt the US government
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Appeals for patents trademarks, etc.
US Court of International Trade
Tariffs and trade matters
Court of Military Appeals
US Tax Court
Income tax and tax issues
First created in 1789
Federal trial courts
Original jurisdiction involving federal law (determine guilty or innocent)
Both civil and criminal cases
Grand Jury (23 people)
Determine if there is enough evidence to merit a trial
Issue an inditement
Secret
Petit Jury (12 people)
Determine guilt or innocence
If a grand jury determines if there is evidence for a trial, the petit jury decides the trial
Hearing federal issues, improper courtroom procedures, incorrect application of law in lower courts
Usually 3 judges
No jury because experts on the law/courtroom procedures are needed
Only court mentioned in the Constitution, established through Article III
Final decision-maker on all federal laws
Currently 9 justices including the Chief Justice
Appointed for life/confirmed by the Senate
Session runs first Monday in October through June
Original jurisdiction when they hear the case for the first time
Cases between states
Cases involving foreign ambassadors and other diplomats
Cases between the US and a state
A state and a citizen of another state (action brought by a state)
Cases reviewed from lower courts
US Courts of Appeal
States’ highest courts
Court of Military Appeals
US regulatory commissions
Legislative courts
Writ of Certiorari— An order from the SCOTUS to a lower court to send up the records on a case for review
4/9 justices need to grant a cert— prevent a majority of the court from controlling all the cases it agrees to hear
Petition for Certiorari— A document which a losing party files with the SCOTUS asking it to review the decision of a lower court
Must raise a constitutional issue or show legal error in a lower court
Brief— Submitted by the lawyers, a written statement setting forth the legal arguments, relevant facts, and precedents supporting one side of a case
Amicus Curiae Brief— “friend of the court” filed by parties with an interest in the case
Oral Arguments— Lawyers on each side of the case have only 30 minutes to argue their point of view
Conference— Led by the chief justice, all 9 (at least 6) gather and give their conclusions on each case
All votes have the same weight
Unanimous Opinion— All justices vote the same way (about ¼ to ⅓ of decisions are unanimous)
Majority Opinion— Expresses the views of the majority of the justices
Concurring Opinion— One or more justices who agree with the majority’s conclusions about a case but for varied reasons write this opinion
Dissenting Opinion— The opinion of the justices on the losing side of the case. Although the decision may not have won, years down the line the dissent could be more favorable to changes in society
Judicial Activism— The courts should play a key role in shaping national policy
Court allows minority voice to be heard
Should apply the Constitution to social and political questions
Judicial Restraint— The court should avoid taking the initiative on social and political questions, defer to the majority
Upholds acts of Congress unless they clearly violate a specific part of the Constitution
Updated Approaches:
Neutralist Model— The meaning of the Constitutional text (textualism), value of Stare Decisis (precedent)
Attitudinal Decision-making Model— Look at the statistical pattern of justices’ decision-making, using Martin-Quinn scores to see justices’ decisions based on personal ideological views
Originalism (original Constitution intent) vs. living, evolving constitutionalism (how it applies to today’s world)
What type of interpretation a justice uses often depends on how you view them
Statutory Law— Statues are laws written by the US Congress, state legislatures, and local legislative bodies
Case/Common Law— Law made by judges in the process of resolving individual cases
Civil rights— The government’’s collective decisions on the treatment of individuals
Civil liberties— Restrictions on the government
No age limit
No residency requirement
No citizenship requirement
Life term limit
Federal judges are appointed by the president and approved by the Senate
Senatorial Courtesy— “Recommendation” from the senators of a state regarding a federal judge of a state, asking their opinion on the judge’s qualifications
Litmus Test— Measuring a judge’s personal opinion on different matters to see if they will be able to listen to facts over their own opinions
Judicial Review— The power of the judiciary to examine and, if necessary, invalidate actions undertaken by the legislative and executive branches if deemed unconstitutional or unlawful
Not explicitly stated in the Constitution
John Marshall set the precdent of judicial review through the SCOTUS ruling Marbury v. Madison
Can review:
Acts of Congress (and can remove certain parts of a law)
State actions that are against the Constitution (Supremacy Clause)
Presidential power (executive orders)
Federal agency protections (bureaucracies)
Jurisdiction— The power to make legal decisions and judgements
Dual court system, state and federal courts
Original Jurisdiction— A court’s power to be the first to hear a case
Appellate Jurisdiction— A court’s power to review a case appealed from a lower court
Federal Court Jurisdiction— Federal cases (US matters) and diversity cases (involving citizens from two or more states)
Created by Congress for specialized purposes
US Claims Courts
Original jurisdiction in claims agaisnt the US government
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Appeals for patents trademarks, etc.
US Court of International Trade
Tariffs and trade matters
Court of Military Appeals
US Tax Court
Income tax and tax issues
First created in 1789
Federal trial courts
Original jurisdiction involving federal law (determine guilty or innocent)
Both civil and criminal cases
Grand Jury (23 people)
Determine if there is enough evidence to merit a trial
Issue an inditement
Secret
Petit Jury (12 people)
Determine guilt or innocence
If a grand jury determines if there is evidence for a trial, the petit jury decides the trial
Hearing federal issues, improper courtroom procedures, incorrect application of law in lower courts
Usually 3 judges
No jury because experts on the law/courtroom procedures are needed
Only court mentioned in the Constitution, established through Article III
Final decision-maker on all federal laws
Currently 9 justices including the Chief Justice
Appointed for life/confirmed by the Senate
Session runs first Monday in October through June
Original jurisdiction when they hear the case for the first time
Cases between states
Cases involving foreign ambassadors and other diplomats
Cases between the US and a state
A state and a citizen of another state (action brought by a state)
Cases reviewed from lower courts
US Courts of Appeal
States’ highest courts
Court of Military Appeals
US regulatory commissions
Legislative courts
Writ of Certiorari— An order from the SCOTUS to a lower court to send up the records on a case for review
4/9 justices need to grant a cert— prevent a majority of the court from controlling all the cases it agrees to hear
Petition for Certiorari— A document which a losing party files with the SCOTUS asking it to review the decision of a lower court
Must raise a constitutional issue or show legal error in a lower court
Brief— Submitted by the lawyers, a written statement setting forth the legal arguments, relevant facts, and precedents supporting one side of a case
Amicus Curiae Brief— “friend of the court” filed by parties with an interest in the case
Oral Arguments— Lawyers on each side of the case have only 30 minutes to argue their point of view
Conference— Led by the chief justice, all 9 (at least 6) gather and give their conclusions on each case
All votes have the same weight
Unanimous Opinion— All justices vote the same way (about ¼ to ⅓ of decisions are unanimous)
Majority Opinion— Expresses the views of the majority of the justices
Concurring Opinion— One or more justices who agree with the majority’s conclusions about a case but for varied reasons write this opinion
Dissenting Opinion— The opinion of the justices on the losing side of the case. Although the decision may not have won, years down the line the dissent could be more favorable to changes in society
Judicial Activism— The courts should play a key role in shaping national policy
Court allows minority voice to be heard
Should apply the Constitution to social and political questions
Judicial Restraint— The court should avoid taking the initiative on social and political questions, defer to the majority
Upholds acts of Congress unless they clearly violate a specific part of the Constitution
Updated Approaches:
Neutralist Model— The meaning of the Constitutional text (textualism), value of Stare Decisis (precedent)
Attitudinal Decision-making Model— Look at the statistical pattern of justices’ decision-making, using Martin-Quinn scores to see justices’ decisions based on personal ideological views
Originalism (original Constitution intent) vs. living, evolving constitutionalism (how it applies to today’s world)
What type of interpretation a justice uses often depends on how you view them
Statutory Law— Statues are laws written by the US Congress, state legislatures, and local legislative bodies
Case/Common Law— Law made by judges in the process of resolving individual cases
Civil rights— The government’’s collective decisions on the treatment of individuals
Civil liberties— Restrictions on the government