Hershey's Social Bond Theory and Control Theory
Hershey's Social Bond Theory 10/20
Overview of Control Theory
Control theory assumes that humans have inherent criminal motivations.
The central question: Why aren’t all individuals engaging in crime despite this innate tendency?
Response: It's due to social bonds that mitigate these impulses.
Aim of control theory: Explain behavioral conformity and prevention of criminal acts.
Social Bond Theory Elements
Social Bonds are seen as the primary factor preventing criminal behavior.
Weakened social connections lead individuals to rely on self-interest and disregard societal rules.
Individuals isolated from society show selfish behavior, engaged in crime despite its potential harms to others.
Key Components of Social Bonding
Attachment
Refers to emotional bonds with significant others (e.g., parents).
Strong attachments deter criminal behavior because of the expectations that the attachment figures have for them not to engage in crime.
Commitment
Involves investment in conventional behavior such as education and employment.
Engagement in crime risks these investments and thus diminishes likelihood of criminal behavior.
Involvement
Participation in conventional societal activities acts as a buffer against crime.
Belief
Refers to adherence to societal norms and laws.
Individuals who believe in the moral validity of these norms are less likely to engage in criminal acts.
The Role of Parenting in Socialization
Parents as the primary facilitators of socialization; effective parenting reduces the chances of criminal behavior.
Effective Parenting:
Rules: Establish clear expectations and boundaries.
Monitoring: Supervise and track children’s behavior to ensure adherence to expectations.
Sanctioning: Apply appropriate consequences for rule violations. Severity of punishment should match the seriousness of the offense.
Consistency: Rules must be enforced uniformly across instances.
Transition to Self-Control Theory
Hershey's evolution in theory moves from social bonds being external to a focus on self-control as an internal factor.
Self-control theory assumes:
If left unchecked, individuals will pursue criminal acts.
Conversely, effective socialization can build self-control, reducing the likelihood of criminal behavior.
Characteristics of Low Self-Control
Impulsivity: Acts without consideration of long-term consequences.
Short-term focus: Concentrates solely on immediate gratification.
Insensitivity: Indifferent to the impact of actions on others.
Risk-taking: Engaging in high-risk activities, including crimes.
Controversies in Control Theory
Early Establishment of Self-Control:
Lower self-control typically predicted by age eight, leading to lifelong criminal behavior.
Controversy arises when issues of self-control are considered immutable post this age.
Measurement Issues:
Self-control is difficult to quantify and assess over time.
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Crimes:
Critics argue that some crimes require skill and are not spontaneous, contradicting self-control assumptions.
Insights into Developmental Theory
Dual Taxonomy of Criminal Offenders
Divides offenders into two distinct groups:
Life Course Persistent (LCP)
Begin offending at a young age, continue throughout life.
Responsible for a major portion of serious crimes.
Adolescents Limited (AL)
Engage in crime primarily during adolescence, with less persistence post-adolescence.
The trajectory for LCP offenders remains stable and persistent, indicating a deep-rooted connection with early life circumstances.
Conclusion
Control theories highlight the importance of social bonds and parenting in crime prevention.
Self-control theories suggest that a personal internal mechanism also plays a critical role in determining criminal behavior.
The dual taxonomy offers insight into the different paths offenders take, influenced by early socialization processes.