Business_law_TEXTBOOK__1__230307_222120-53-63
4.3 The Moment and Place of Formation of a Contract
A contract arises at the moment when consensus is reached between parties.
Consensus occurs when each party is aware that the other agrees with them.
The point of consensus is critical for determining:
If an offer can be revoked
To assess if an offer has expired due to time
When contractual duties become enforceable (e.g., when interest payments start)
The place of formation affects which court has jurisdiction over the contract.
4.3.1 When Offeror and Offeree are Present
If both parties are present, it's straightforward to determine the time and place of the contract formation.
The contract forms at the time the acceptance is communicated and at the location of the parties.
This is based on the information or ascertainment theory, indicating that a contract is formed when the offeror becomes aware of the acceptance.
4.3.2 When Parties are Not Present
If the offeror and offeree are not in each other's presence, acceptance is communicated through another medium (e.g., call, letter).
In telephone conversations, parties are considered present, and the contract is formed at the moment acceptance is communicated.
Example: Nabilah in Cape Town accepts Bill’s offer from New York, forming a contract in New York as Bill learns of the acceptance there.
In contrast, with postal contracts, the dispatch theory applies, indicating a contract forms at the time and place the acceptance letter is posted, unless specified otherwise.
4.3.3 Electronic Agreements
For contracts made via fax, email, or the internet, the communication method determines if the ascertaining theory applies.
If the method allows for instantaneous communication, it parallels being present, applying the ascertainment theory.
Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 outlines that electronic agreements are formed when acceptance is received by the offeror.
Reception theory: the effective time is when the complete data message enters the addressee’s information system.
If a contract uses both traditional and electronic methods, parties should clarify the time and place of formation.
4.4 Consensus and Defects in Will
Consensus is foundational for contract validity.
If consensus is missing (like in material mistakes), the agreement is void.
If consensus exists but was acquired through improper means (e.g., misrepresentation, duress), the contract is valid but voidable.
4.4.1 Absence of Consensus – Mistake
Mistakes occur when parties misunderstand material facts or legal rules related to the contract.
Depending on the circumstances, parties may still be held to their intentions.
Requirements for a Mistake to Void a Contract
The mistake must concern a material fact or legal rule.
The fact or rule must be material.
The mistake must be reasonable.
Types of Mistake
Must relate to either fact or law.
Examples include:
Misidentifying contracting parties (e.g., offering a position to the wrong person).
Errors in content of the contract (e.g., misunderstanding the subject of the agreement).
Mistakes regarding legal interpretations that differ from the law’s perspective (e.g., misunderstanding contract rights).
4.4.1.1 Reasonable Mistake
A reasonable mistake is one that a reasonable person would make in similar conditions.
If a person is negligent or careless, they cannot escape liability for their mistake.
4.4.2 Improperly Obtained Consensus
Instances where one party's assent is obtained improperly include misrepresentation, duress, and undue influence.
4.4.2.1 Misrepresentation
An untrue statement made to induce another party into a contract.
Misrepresentation must:
Be about a material fact.
Be made by one party to another.
Be unlawful.
Induce the contract as it stands.
4.4.2.2 Duress
Unlawful threats causing a party to conclude a contract.
Aimed at the person’s fear of harm or violence, making the contract voidable.
4.4.2.3 Undue Influence
Occurs when one party uses their influence to persuade another against their independent will.
Typically observed in relationships with power imbalances (e.g., doctor-patient).
5.1 Introduction to Capacity to Perform Juristic Acts
Consensus is vital, but parties must also have the capacity to execute juristic acts to create valid contracts.
Legal capacity vs. capacity to act: not all with legal capacity can perform acts successfully.
5.2 Age
Age determines a person's ability to appreciate contract consequences.
Three age bands for capacity to act:
Under 7 years: no capacity.
7 to 18 years: limited capacity with guardian assistance.
18 years and older: full capacity.
5.2.1 Majority
Age for majority is now 18.
Valid contracts can be concluded upon reaching this age, although prior applications were required for minors aged 18+.
5.2.2 Minority
Minors under 7 have no capacity.
Minors aged 7-18 have limited capacity, requiring guardian assistance.