11/18 US History
Indian Removal Policy
Andrew Jackson enacted the Indian removal policy during westward expansion.
Believed in Manifest Destiny, aimed for American expansion west of the Pacific Ocean.
Jackson's policies led to clashes with Native Americans over land.
Despite winning cases in court, Native Americans faced forced removal.
Indian Removal Act of 1830
Ordered five civilized tribes: Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles to move to reservations in Oklahoma.
Economic motives were driving factors; Jackson benefited from land speculation.
Thousands died during forced relocations on the "Trail of Tears" (1830-1838).
Economic Context
Cotton industry expansion required more land for growth.
Indigenous peoples occupied fertile lands; their removal aided cotton economy.
Industrial North also needed cotton for textile production.
Supreme Court Cases
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia affirmed Cherokee rights but was ignored by Jackson.
Court decisions lacked enforcement power without executive action.
Black Hawk War
Resistance from tribes like the Sauk led by Chief Black Hawk was brutally crushed.
Contributed to the broader removal of Native Americans.
Compromise of 1850
California entered as a free state; popular sovereignty applied to other territories.
Enacted a stricter Fugitive Slave Law, which increased tensions between North and South.
Manifest Destiny and Mexican-American War
Under President James K. Polk, the U.S. sought to expand territory.
Conflict over Texas border led to the Mexican-American War.
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo resulted in significant territorial gains for the U.S. (California, Nevada, Utah, etc.) in exchange for $15 million.
Sectional Tensions
Post-war fears of slavery expansion heightened; abolitionist sentiment grew in the North.
Rise of new political parties (e.g., Republican Party) to address slavery issues abandoned by Democrats and Whigs.