lecture 13

Overview of Electoral Rules

  • Definition of electoral rules:

    • Set of rules that govern how voting occurs, what candidates can run, and the representation of votes in elected bodies.

  • Discussion on different types of Proportional Representation (PR) systems: Closed-list PR and Open-list PR.

Closed-List Proportional Representation (PR)

  • Definition:

    • A voting system where voters cast their votes for a party rather than individual candidates.

    • Parties prepare lists of candidates, and voters vote for the party, not the individuals.

  • Example:

    • In South Africa, the ballot features numerous candidates (e.g., 400 candidates) from various parties.

    • Voters primarily recognize the leading candidate of a party (e.g., African National Congress) but not all individuals on the list.

  • Candidate Selection:

    • Candidates are chosen by the party organization, based on their ranking on the list (e.g., Candidate 1 has higher chances of winning than Candidate 200).

    • Voters have no influence over which specific candidates from the party list are elected.

Open-List Proportional Representation (PR)

  • Definition:

    • Voters can cast their votes for individual candidates within party lists, impacting which candidates from that party receive seats.

  • Example of Voting Process:

    • In a hypothetical election:

    • Four parties and four available seats with multiple candidates.

    • Votes determine how many seats each party receives.

    • Individual votes for candidates influence who is prioritized within the party.

  • Advantages:

    • Provides voters with the flexibility to select specific candidates, allowing for ideological or district-specific preferences.

  • Challenges:

    • Complexity in making choices; individuals may find themselves voting for lesser-known candidates who may not win (e.g., Candidate Antonio with 8 votes).

  • Case Study:

    • Brazilian election where a professional clown received more votes than other candidates but lost due to party weaknesses.

    • This demonstrates the challenges of individual influence in party systems.

Implications of Electoral Systems

  • Effects on Political Parties:

    • Duverger's Law:

    • Empirical observation that single-member district systems tend to favor two-party systems, while PR systems typically facilitate multiple parties.

  • Variants of Electoral Systems:

    • Mixed systems combine elements of PR with single-member districts.

    • Ranked-choice voting and transferable vote systems also exist and help address some issues in representation.

  • Importance of Electoral Systems:

    • Key in determining the formation of governments.

    • Influences legislative processes and governmental accountability.

Psychological Component of Voting

  • Strategic vs. Sincere Voting:

    • Sincere voting:

    • Voting for the preferred candidate without concern for likelihood of winning.

    • Strategic voting:

    • Choosing a candidate with a better chance of winning, often to prevent undesired outcomes.

  • Observed Behavior:

    • In elections, voters often abandon small parties due to concerns of wasted votes.

Mechanical and Psychological Effects

  • Mechanical Effect:

    • High disproportionality exists in single-member districts leading to a waste of votes.

    • More proportional results in PR systems help small parties gain representation.

  • Psychological Effect:

    • Voters abandon small parties knowing they are unlikely to win.

    • Candidates and donors are less likely to support parties they think have no chance of winning.

Consequences of Electoral Choices

  • Representation Effects:

    • Systems with multiple parties could lead to increased representation for diverse opinions; lack of representation can lead to discontent and protests/violence.

  • Polarization Effects:

    • Polarization indicates the ideological distance between parties; two-party systems may lead to convergence towards the middle, while PR systems allow for diverse perspectives but potential for extremism.

  • The Paradox of Choice:

    • Too many candidates may overwhelm voters, leading to lower turnout or uninformed choices.

    • Research indicates fewer candidates may aid selection and increase participation.

Summary of Key Results

  • Effective Number of Parties Calculation:

    • Formula representation:

    • n=1<em>i=1Np</em>i2n = \frac{1}{\sum<em>{i=1}^{N} p</em>i^2} where $n$ is the effective number of parties and $p_i$ is the proportion of votes/seats.

  • PR systems generally yield larger numbers of parties compared to single-member district systems, contributing to a greater diversity of representation in governance.

Closing Remarks

  • Notable transitions within electoral systems, such as in New Zealand, demonstrate the observable impact of PR on increasing the number of political parties.

  • Discussions on how changing electoral rules can shift political landscapes and party dynamics will continue to evolve.