Social-Cognitive Learning Theories Flashcards
Social-Cognitive Learning Theories
Key theorists: Rotter, Bandura, & Miller
Thoughts and Criticism of Conditioning
Conditioning theories can explain:
- Attitude formation and preferences through emotional conditioning.
- How behaviors are strengthened and weakened.However, they are seen as incomplete due to:
- Observational Learning: People learn by watching others.
- Cognitive Processing: Decisions are based on thinking about possible outcomes rather than merely responding to stimuli.
New Theoretical Approaches
A shift towards cognitive and social learning theories, which focus on mental events and social aspects of learning.
Social-Cognitive Theories Framework
Three Fundamental Factors Determining Personality Development:
1. Environmental Conditions:
- Includes social, political, cultural context, and specific learning experiences.
2. Cognitive-Personality Factors:
- Incorporates beliefs, expectations, values, intentions, social roles, emotional states, as well as biological and genetic determinants.
3. Behavior:
- Encompasses all actions and activities, including verbal expressions.Together, these factors determine information evaluation, interpretation, organization, and usage.
New Principles of Social-Cognitive Theories
Social Reinforcement:
- Learning is driven by social approval or disapproval rather than mere reduction of physical needs.
- Reinforcers include attention, interest, smiles, hugs, frowns, etc.Self-Reinforcement:
- Individuals respond to their own behaviors with approval or disapproval (internal self-reinforcement).
- Can include internal self-punishment.Vicarious Emotional Arousal:
- Experiencing events indirectly through others, enhancing empathy and learning opportunities (vicarious emotional conditioning).Vicarious Reinforcement:
- Behavior changes after witnessing reinforcement or punishment received by others, deducing that similar actions may yield rewards or consequences.
Expectancies in Social-Cognitive Learning
Expectancies:
- Mental models linking actions to outcomes.
- Reinforcers provide insight into effective actions and motivate future behaviors via anticipation.Efficacy Expectancies:
- Represent self-efficacy; confidence in the ability to perform desired actions is crucial for effective therapy and self-esteem (Bandura).Role of Awareness:
- Conditioning requires awareness of correlations; reinforcement is effective only when reinforced behaviors are recognized.
J. Rotter's Contributions
Personality operates as both a self-determining and adaptive system influenced by environmental conditions.
History of Reinforcement:
- Shapes individual expectations about outcomes, guiding behavior through cognitive components.Interaction between personality and environment influences behavior.
Rotter's Social Learning Theory
Behavior is not solely dependent on rewards but on Behavioral Potential:
- Definition: The probability of a behavior occurring among various potentials in a given situation.
- Influenced by expected reinforcement and its value to the individual.
Locus of Control (Rotter)
Internal Locus of Control
Belief that one can determine their future.
Passion and hard work lead to achieving goals.
Active control over one’s life.
External Locus of Control
Belief that the future is beyond personal control.
Passively accepts outcomes driven by luck, fate, or divine will.
Manifestations of Locus of Control
Examples of Internal vs. External beliefs:
- "If I work hard, I will succeed." (Internal)
- "Most things are not in my control." (External)Reinforces perception of control in achieving success.
A. Bandura's Contributions
Reciprocal Determinism:
- Interaction among personal factors, the environment, and behavior; emphasizes mutual influence rather than mere reaction to environmental factors.Individuals utilize conscious cognitive capacities for understanding and representing events systematically.
Fundamental capabilities include:
- Symbolization
- Vicarious experiences
- Forethought/prediction
- Self-regulation
- Self-reflection
Symbolization in Learning
Represents events and relationships in symbolic form, allowing transformation of experiences into cognitive models.
Enables problem-solving without immediate behavioral change; cognitive guidance based on stored information.
Observational Learning
Occurs when an individual observes an action performed by another and acquires the ability to repeat it (Bandura, 1986; Flanders, 1968).
Observer should not previously associate behavior with the context.
Facilitates quick learning of substantial information (e.g., during infancy).
Influential Factors in Observational Learning
Characteristics affecting observational learning:
- Strength of relationship with the model (e.g., attachment).
- Similarity (e.g., gender).
- Model’s status, power, and competence.
- Attractiveness of the model.Pertinent context: acquisition of gender roles and aggressive behaviors.
Generalization in Observational Learning
Generalization of Semantic Meaning:
- Similar stimuli evoke similar responses.
- Example: the word "divorce" links to courtroom concepts.Learning not just of specific behaviors but also implicit rules and principles; notable in language learning—overgeneralization of rules.
Symbolic Modeling and Anticipation
Information about behavior and outcomes transmittable through verbal or visual channels; models can be fictional (e.g., fairy-tale characters).
Foresight:
- Anticipating behavior consequences aids in regulating actions towards desired states.
- Establishes outcome expectations and goal-oriented behavior.
Self-Regulation in Learning
Requires:
- Self-observation and evaluation.Self-Reflection:
- Ability to evaluate one’s own thoughts and actions, correcting cognitive errors.
Variables in Observational Learning
Attention and Retention:
- Importance of attending to appropriate aspects of the model.
- Memory retention through imaginal or verbal coding strategies.Production:
- Translating learned concepts into actions; relies on prior knowledge of components.Acquisition vs Performance:
- Individuals learn more than they perform; outcome expectations influence execution.
Summary of Influential Variables in Observational Learning
Category | Examples |
|---|---|
Attention for Encoding | Model's attractiveness, behavior distinctness, observer's motivation. |
Retention | Use of imagery, language, and mental rehearsal. |
Production | Respondent's capability and prior experiences. |
Performance | Consequences to both model and observer affect outcomes. |
Expectancy in Bandura's Framework
Self-Efficacy Expectation:
- Two types:
1. Outcome Expectancy: Expectations regarding reinforcement.
2. Self-Efficacy Expectancy: Belief in one's ability to perform an action.Core question revolves around the capacity to perform tasks successfully.
Perceived Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy influences willingness and effort; enhances likelihood of achieving tasks.
Typically associated with specific behaviors and their outcomes.
Mechanisms of Self-Efficacy
Cognitive Processes & Goal Setting:
- Shapes thinking patterns and ambition.Motivations:
- Affects effort and perseverance, with slight overconfidence improving outcomes.Emotional Impact:
- Influences stress levels during challenges and guides choices in environments (e.g., career decisions).
Sources of Self-Efficacy
Personal experiences (successes or failures).
Vicarious experiences (learning through observation).
Social persuasion (encouragement or discouragement).
Physiological and emotional states.
- Positive states elevate self-efficacy, negative states diminish it.
Bandura's Concept of Reinforcement
Social Reinforcement: Praise, attention, acceptance.
Self-Reinforcement: Self-administered rewards or punishments (pride, guilt).
Vicarious Reinforcement: Learning via observing others receiving rewards or punishments.
Observational Learning Summary
More effective than classical or operant conditioning.
Core learning mechanism for behaviors and attitudes, starting early in life.
Learns from models’ successes and mistakes.
Encourages creativity and new behaviors while relying on internal evaluations of conduct.
Bobo Doll Experiment Overview
Children view a film depicting an adult performing aggressive acts towards a doll.
Experimental Conditions:
- Model rewarded by another adult (praise + candy).
- No consequences for the model.
- Model punished by another adult (verbal and physical reprimand).Children observed the doll for 10 minutes, followed by a recall task (juice and stickers offered).
Results of the Bobo Doll Experiment
Performance Dependence:
- Action performance varied based on expectations of consequences, with behavior still being learned regardless of immediate expression.
Problematic Behavior and Observational Learning
Emphasizes vicarious conditioning, expectancies, and observational learning.
Indirect experiences can trigger emotional responses; behaviors are mediated by expectancies.
Behavioral deficits may stem from inadequate observational learning and flawed social expectations.
Modeling-Based Therapy Applications
Targeted at skill deficits;
- Client encouraged to engage in skills through direct or mental practice.
- Utilizes vicarious reinforcements to build self-efficacy.Applied to emotional challenges (fears):
- Mastery Model: Shows no fear, encouraging vicarious extinction.
- Coping Model: Displays fear but handles it effectively (mentally supported by observers).Participant Modeling:
- Model demonstrates behavior in front of the client, who then replicates it with assistance, followed by independent practice.
Impact and Criticism of Social-Cognitive Approach
Pros:
Easily researched and thoroughly tested with substantial empirical evidence.
Effective cognitive-behavioral techniques with simplicity.
Cons & Criticism:
Research can oversimplify complexities of behavior.
Lacks depth in personality theory, focusing mainly on behavioral determinants.