Voting Rights and Trends in American History
Voting as a Cornerstone of Democracy
- Definition: Voting is essential for democracy and upholds civil liberties.
- Types of Ballots:
- Paper
- Electronic
- Absentee
- 2024 Election Overview:
- 3 Federal Positions
- 12 State Positions
- 15 Local Positions
Who Can Vote?
- Eligibility Criteria:
- US Citizenship
- Minimum age of 18
- Registration required in 49 states
- Must meet residency requirements
- Exclusions:
- Noncitizens
- Individuals convicted of felonies (varies by state)
- Residents of US territories (cannot vote for President)
- Legally mentally incapacitated individuals
Historical Voting Rights & Trends
1700s: Early Voting Restrictions
- Eligibility:
- Gender: Men only
- Race: White
- Age: 21+
- Religion: Christian
- Voting: Semi-private with rampant fraud
- Tax-paying requirements
- Notable State Constitution:
- New Jersey's voting rights for affluent landowners
1800s: Jacksonian Democracy
- Changes Between 1800-1830:
- Continued restrictions by gender, race, age, and religion
- Increased push for public, transparent elections
- Focus on uplifting the common man
Reconstruction Era (1865-1877)
- Key Amendments:
- 13th Amendment (1865): Abolished slavery
- 14th Amendment (1868): Granted citizenship and equal protection
- 15th Amendment (1870): Prohibits voting discrimination based on race
- Outcome: African American men gained voting rights but full enforcement failed
Women’s Suffrage Movement
- Approach: State-by-state legal battles
- Major Cases:
- Minor v. Happersett (1875): Citizenship does not guarantee voting rights
- 19th Amendment (1920): Prohibits denial of voting rights based on sex
1920-1965 Voting Trends
- Changes:
- Gender, race, age, and religion restrictions eased
- Voting became private with diminished fraud
Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA)
- Signed by: Lyndon B. Johnson
- Goals:
- Protect rights established by the 14th and 15th Amendments
- Prohibit racial discrimination in voting
- Main Impacts:
- Outlawed discriminatory practices
- Required preclearance for states changing voting laws
- Banned literacy tests
- Expanded protections for language minorities
Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
- Overview: Supreme Court ruled that preclearance was unconstitutional.
- Key Points:
- Voting discrimination has decreased, making prior enforcement unnecessary
- Arguments in dissent highlighted ongoing need for protections.
Looking Ahead
- Post-Shelby Developments:
- States enacted laws to restrict voting access
- Introduction of voter ID laws, voter roll purges, and reduced polling locations
- A notable decline in Black voter registration in the South since 2013
- Legislative efforts in several states to bolster voting rights