Chapter 12: Prosocial Behavior
Why Does Prosocial Behavior Matter?
People who report more prosocial behavior:
More meaning and purpose in life
More happiness and life satisfaction
More popular in grades 3-8
More attractive to others
Social structure relies on prosocial behaviors
It seems like the “right” thing to do
Altruism
Behavior by an animal (including humans) that is not beneficial to or may be harmful to itself but that benefits others of its species
Types of altruism, based on evolutionary theory:
Type of Altruism | Target of Altruism |
Kin altruism | Genetic relatives |
Mutualism | Members of the community or team |
Reciprocal Altruism | People who can help you |
Competitive Altruism | Anyone, but in the presence of rivals |
Psychological Motivations for Altruism
Egoism-Motivated Altruism
Engaging in prosocial behaviors because it benefits you to do so
Financial rewards, social capital, and increased self-worth
Empathy-Motivated Altruism
Engaging in helping behaviors to reduce the needs of others, without consideration of costs or benefits to oneself
Altruism can be motivated by empathetic concern, an emotional response that occurs when we see others in need
Batson et al. (1981)
Participants witness a distressed student receive a series of electrical shocks
Participants told they’d watch one (easy escape) or two trials (difficult escape)
More evidence that empathy predicts altruism
Healthcare workers are more likely to sanitize their hands when reminded that it keeps patients safe than when reminded that it keeps them safe (Grant & Hoffman, 2011)
Empathy for the most vulnerable in the population associated with social distancing in the US, UK, and Germany at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (Pfattheicher et al., 2020)
Altruistic kidney donors show more activation in bilateral anterior insula than controls when watching others experience pain (Brethel-Haurwitz et al., 2018)
Benefits of Giving Support
Toddlers aged 19 to 23 months, coded as happier when giving treats than when receiving them (d = 1.12)
Also, happier when giving away one's own treats compared to giving away experimenter’s treats (d = .46) [ Aknin et al., 2012]
Older adults (N = 1,118) who reported giving more help also reported being physically healthier
To relatives or non-relatives
Controlling for: age, gender, ethnicity, education, income, marital status, size of social network, functional mobility
Neither receiving help nor reciprocity is related to health
Older married adults (N = 846)
Prosocial behavior = unpaid hours providing instrumental support to people with whom they don’t live
Stress is related to an increased risk of death in the next 5 years
Prosocial behavior is related to decreased risk of death
Prosocial behavior moderated the association between stress and death
Providing support related to psychological benefits even for those with recent trauma (Frazier et al., 2013) and after the recent loss of a spouse (Brown et al., 2009)
Compassionate Goals
Self-image goals: focus on constructing and maintaining images of the self
Compassionate goals: focus on supporting others and ensuring that you aren’t causing harm
What is good for others is also good for you
More satisfying relationships
Tend to be held in higher esteem by others
Related to decreases in symptoms of depression and anxiety over 10 weeks in college students (Crocker et al., 2010)
In those diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders, associated with fewer daily symptoms and perceptions of support from others over 10 days (Erickson et al., 2017)
Moral Elevation
Warm, uplifting feeling that you get when you see unexpected acts of human goodness, kindness, courage, or compassion
Provides evidence of morality, human decency, pride, community, etc.
Opposite of social disgust
Described as being touched, inspired, or moved
Promotes prosocial motivation
Related to psychological growth and compassionate goals following trauma (Tingey et al., 2019)
Singularity Effect of Identifiable Victims
Tendency to have stronger reactions to and more willingness to help an identified individual as opposed to a group with the same need
People tend to be relatively insensitive to the scale or scope of need/crisis
Participants with collectivistic values are less likely to demonstrate this effect
More likely to contribute to the group than those with less collectivistic values
When printed with collectivistic values - using we, us, ours- more likely to donate to a group than an individual