Lameness case 3
Lameness Investigation - Case Study: Turnip
Patient Profile:
Name: Turnip
Age: 14 years
Breed: Thoroughbred
Use: General riding
1. Introduction
Owner's concerns: Turnip has become agitated during farriery (shoeing) of the right hind leg.
Additional symptoms: Resentment to saddle and potential lameness in the hind end.
Next steps:Begin lameness investigation.
2. History Taking
2.1 Questions for the Owner
What happens during farriery?
Has there been any change in saddle?
What activities is the horse used for?
Has the exercise level changed?
Duration of problem? Did symptoms follow specific activities?
Any recent trauma (falls)?
New swellings, heat, or painful areas noticed?
When was the horse last trimmed or shod?
Previous treatments attempted?
Lameness progression (better or worse)?
Past history of lameness?
3. Static Examination
3.1 Conformation Assessment
🐴 Observation:
Turnip's hind feet aligned together on flat surface.
Right gluteal muscle atrophy observed (right side muscle smaller than the left).
Interpretation: Loss of muscle mass indicates disuse atrophy likely due to pain. Suggests chronic lameness condition.
3.2 Palpation Findings
Areas palpated: neck, back, pelvis, hind limbs.
Findings:
Muscle Discomfort: Longissimus dorsi muscles tender to pressure.
Swelling: Firm, non-painful swelling on dorso-medial tarsus (distal intertarsal joint).
Terminology: 'Seat of spavin' - indicates potential joint issues.
3.3 Limb Elevation & Hoof Exam
Findings during examination:
Left hind limb: Acceptable to lift.
Right hind limb: Agitated response.
Observations:
Right hind seems stiffer, harder to lift; hoof is squared at the toe, indicating limited hoof clearance and potential discomfort.
Conclusion: Reduced range of motion due to identified discomfort during elevation.
4. Dynamic Examination
4.1 Straight Line Observation
At walk: No obvious lameness.
At trot:
Moderate severity of right hind lameness (3/5).
Asymmetric movement noted in gluteal muscles and hoof dragging sound distinctly audible.
4.2 Lunge Examination
At right trot on lunge: Lameness mirrors previous observations with decreased stride length and hoof dragging.
4.3 Flexion Testing
Process: Conduct flexion tests beginning with non-lame leg.
Results:
Left hind distal - negative
Right hind distal - negative
Left hind proximal - negative
Right hind proximal - sustained positive response, indicating severe lameness worsening in subsequent trotting.
5. Baseline Lameness
Observations:
Right gluteal muscle atrophy, pelvic issues, reduced range of motion at right hind leg, and swelling in target regions.
Overall scoring: 3/5 right hind lame at trot.
6. Regional Anaesthesia
6.1 Indications
Required due to insufficient signs for precise lameness localization combined with back pain.
6.2 Choice of Block
Initial block recommended: Tarso-metatarsal and distal intertarsal joint blocks to identify pain sources effectively due to previous findings.
7. Diagnostic Imaging
7.1 Initial Imaging Choice
Radiography selected as the primary imaging modality to assess distal tarsal region.
7.2 Tarsal Joint Overview
There are five significant joints in the tarsal region, crucial for understanding potential lameness sources.
8. Radiological Findings
8.1 Joint Space Analysis
Radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing in the distal intertarsal joint linked to cartilage degeneration, contributing to osteoarthritis diagnosis.
8.2 Subchondral Bone Sclerosis & Bone Lysis
Identified in third metacarpal and tarsal regions, denoting osteoarthritic changes. Corresponding lesions noted in joint evaluations.
9. Diagnosis
Final Findings:
Diagnosis of osteoarthritis in right distal intertarsal and tarso-metatarsal joints
Secondary muscular back pain resulting from altered movement patterns due to hind leg pain.
10. Treatment Options
10.1 Management Strategies
Discuss treatment options:
NSAIDs, corticosteroids, bisphosphonates, joint supplements, rehabilitation techniques, corrective farriery.
Emphasize importance of regular monitoring and adjustment of treatment as needed.
10.2 Long-term Considerations
Regular follow-up required to evaluate treatment success with re-examination within 4-6 weeks, adjusting plan based on progress.