Conjugated Diene Stability
Heats of hydrogenation show conjugated dienes are more stable than two alkenes that are not conjugated
Approximate stabilization energy: relative to two isolated alkenes
This stabilization arises from delocalization of pi electrons across the conjugated system
Conceptual takeaway: conjugation lowers the overall energy of the system, making it more thermodynamically stable
Valence Bond Theory vs Molecular Orbital Theory
Valence Bond (VB) Theory
Describes bonds as localized between pairs of atoms
Uses resonance (multiple Lewis structures) to describe delocalization indirectly
Bonds are drawn as line structures; e.g., localized σ and π bonds
Molecular Orbital (MO) Theory
Describes electrons as delocalized over the entire molecule
Bonding and antibonding interactions arise from overlap of atomic orbitals (AOs) and/or hybrid orbitals
AOs combine to form molecular orbitals (σ, σ, π, π)
Produces delocalization built into the description of the molecule
Major contrasts
VB: localized bonds + resonance forms; MO: delocalized electrons in MOs
VB emphasizes resonance between discrete structures; MO emphasizes continuous electron distribution in MOs
VB uses hybridization concepts to explain geometry; MO uses energy-level diagrams to explain bonding patterns
Valence Bond Theory vs Molecular Orbital Theory (Summary of Key Differences)
VB bonds are localized; MO bonds are delocalized over the molecule
VB relies on resonance forms to describe electron distribution; MO relies on constructive/destructive overlap of AOs to form bonding/antibonding MOs
VB uses overlap of atomic/hybrid orbitals to explain bond formation; MO uses linear combinations of AOs to form molecular orbitals
VB predicts molecular shape from electron pairs; MO predicts electron arrangement via MO occupancy
Resonance in VB is needed to describe delocalization; in MO, delocalization is built-in
Molecular Orbital Theory: Ethylene
Two atomic p orbitals on adjacent carbons overlap to form two new MOs
The MO extends over the entire molecule
The π bond in ethylene arises from the overlap of two unhybridized p orbitals
MO description: one bonding π MO and one antibonding π* MO
Relationship between MOs and atoms: number of MOs equals number of AOs (here, two p orbitals → two MOs)
Electron occupancy: both electrons occupy the bonding π MO
Molecular Orbital Theory: Butadiene
Butadiene is a conjugated diene (two ethylenes separated by a single bond)
The π-bonding MOs involve the overlap of four unhybridized p orbitals
The lowest energy MOs are filled first; electrons fill bonding MOs two at a time
Nodes increase as energy increases, leading to higher-energy anti-bonding character in higher MOs
The MO diagram provides an explanation for properties like the shorter, stronger central C–C bond due to delocalization across four atoms
Molecular Orbital Theory: Hexatriene
Hexatriene involves six p orbitals (three conjugated double bonds)
Construct an energy diagram with six MOs corresponding to the six p orbitals
The pi system uses six pi electrons (assuming all π bonds contribute six electrons in total)
The MO diagram shows progressive nodes and energy levels across the six-atom conjugated system
When building the diagram, fill the lowest-energy bonding MOs first, pairwise, then place electrons in higher MOs as needed
Frontier MO Theory
Frontier Orbitals: Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO) and Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO)
These frontier orbitals are the most important for predicting reactivity, especially in photochemistry and cycloadditions
Conjugated systems can interact with light via HOMO → LUMO transitions
The energy gap between HOMO and LUMO often dictates absorption properties and color
In many reactions, the interaction between the HOMO of one reactant and the LUMO of another governs whether a reaction is favorable
UV-Vis Spectroscopy
Conjugated pi systems absorb UV or visible light
Electronic transition: from HOMO to LUMO (π → π*) requires energy that falls in the UV/visible region
UV-Vis provides structural information: absorbance depends on wavelength and electronic transitions
A = log(I0/I), where A is absorbance, I0 is incident intensity, and I is transmitted intensity
Molar absorptivity (ε) describes the intensity of absorption: , where c is concentration and l is path length
λmax (the maximum absorption wavelength) indicates the energy required for the HOMO→LUMO transition
More conjugation lowers the π → π* energy gap, leading to larger λmax (red shift)
UV-Vis Spectroscopy: Practical Implications
Increasing conjugation shifts absorption to longer wavelengths (smaller energy gap)
Spectral data can inform about the degree of conjugation in a molecule
Useful for structural assignments and monitoring electronic transitions in real-time
Looking Ahead (Course Planning)
Continue Chapter 16, next session
SI sessions and recitations scheduled in campus facilities
Recitation times and locations provided for study support
Hydrohalogenation of Conjugated Dienes
Hydrohalogenation: H–X adds across alkenes
For conjugated dienes, hydrohalogenation can yield two regioisomeric products (Markovnikov regioselectivity) depending on where the proton adds and where the halide attaches
Protonation of a conjugated diene forms the more stable, resonance-stabilized allylic carbocation
Nucleophilic attack of the halide (X−) then occurs at either allylic position, generating two possible products
In conjugated systems, electrophiles can add via 1,2- or 1,4-addition patterns depending on kinetics and thermodynamics
Electrophilic Addition to Conjugated Dienes (1,2- vs 1,4-Addition)
1,2-addition products form faster (kinetically favored) due to proximity of reactive centers
1,4-addition products are typically more stable (thermodynamically favored) due to greater substitution and overall stability of the product
Temperature influences product distribution:
At lower temperatures, kinetic control dominates (more 1,2-adduct)
At higher temperatures, thermodynamic control dominates (more 1,4-adduct)
Example data (illustrative): At 0 °C, 71% 1,2-adduct and 29% 1,4-adduct; At 40 °C, 15% 1,2-adduct and 85% 1,4-adduct
Electrophilic Addition to Conjugated Dienes: Temperature and Control
Lower temperatures favor the kinetically faster 1,2-adduct due to a lower activation barrier
Higher temperatures allow equilibration; the more stable, more substituted alkene (1,4-adduct) dominates under thermodynamic control
Conceptual takeaway: temperature controls whether a reaction is under kinetic or thermodynamic control
Pericyclic Reactions: Introduction and Features
Pericyclic reactions occur without ionic or radical intermediates
Four characteristic features:
1) Mechanism is concerted, proceeding without intermediates
2) Involves a ring of electrons moving around a closed loop
3) Transition state is cyclic
4) Solvent polarity generally has no effect on the reaction rateThree main types:
1) Cycloaddition reactions
2) Electrocyclic reactions
3) Sigmatropic rearrangements
The Diels–Alder Reaction
A celebrated cycloaddition: conjugated diene reacts with a dienophile (alkene or alkyne)
Forms a substituted cyclohexene from a diene and an alkene/alkyne
Arrow-pushing can be drawn in a clockwise or counterclockwise fashion; no discrete intermediates in the energy diagram
The Diels–Alder reaction is a [4+2] cycloaddition: the diene contributes 4 π electrons; the dienophile contributes 2 π electrons
Schematic outcome: formation of a six-membered ring (cyclohexene derivative)
Diels–Alder Reaction: Practical Considerations
Factors affecting reaction efficiency and outcome:
Substituents on the dienophile (electron-withdrawing groups accelerate the reaction and increase yield)
Conformation of the diene (must adopt s-cis conformation for reaction to occur readily)
Stereospecificity (the reaction preserves stereochemistry of the starting dienophile/diene)
Regioselectivity (alignment of substituents determines major regioisomer)
Electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) on the dienophile accelerate the reaction by lowering the LUMO energy
An alkyne can function as a dienophile as well
Diels–Alder Considerations: Substituents and Conformation
Dienophile substituents: EWG on the dienophile increases reaction rate and yield
Diene conformation: only s-cis dienes react readily; s-trans or other conformations are less reactive
Stereospecificity: cis/trans relationships in starting materials influence the stereochemistry of the product
Regioselectivity: depends on substitution pattern; if both components are unsymmetrical, two regioisomeric products are possible; major product follows alignment of electron-rich and electron-poor regions
Regioselectivity in Diels–Alder Reactions
Major product prediction involves aligning partial charges: regions of high electron density on the diene align with electron-poor areas on the dienophile
Resonance structures can be used to predict the favored regiochemical outcome
Cyclic Dienes: Endo versus Exo
When a cyclic diene undergoes a Diels–Alder reaction, two bicyclic products are possible: endo and exo
The major product is typically the endo cycloadduct due to favorable secondary interactions between developing π bond and electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) in the transition state
Predicting Products and Practice Questions (Diels–Alder)
Practice: predict products for given reactions and rank dienes by reactivity in Diels–Alder reactions
Typical prompts involve identifying stereochemistry (cis/trans), endo/exo outcomes, and regiochemical major products based on substituent effects
Diels–Alder Thermodynamics and Conditions
Most Diels–Alder reactions are thermodynamically favored at low to moderate temperatures
At temperatures above roughly 200 °C, retro-Diels–Alder can predominate
ΔG must be negative for the reaction to be favorable; ΔH is typically negative due to bond formation, and ΔS is also negative due to a decrease in the number of molecules and formation of a ring
Diels–Alder thermodynamics: overall gain in bond strength often outweighs entropy loss at appropriate temperatures
Additional Diels–Alder Considerations
Substituent effects on dienophile; s-cis conformations on diene; stereospecificity; regioselectivity are key
Endo rule often governs major product due to secondary orbital interactions
Diels–Alder: Practical Look Ahead
Most chapter-focused content emphasizes applying MO and frontier-orbital concepts to predict outcomes
Consider HOMO of the diene interacting with LUMO of the dienophile for cycloaddition feasibility
Symmetry-allowed vs symmetry-forbidden pathways depend on orbital phase matching
M.O. Theory and Cycloaddition Reactions: Core Rules
In cycloadditions, the reaction proceeds when the HOMO of one component can interact with the LUMO of the other in a phase-matched way
For a simple thermal [2+2] cycloaddition, the necessary HOMO-LUMO phase alignment is not satisfied, making the process symmetry-forbidden thermally
Photochemical excitation can overcome symmetry restrictions: the excited-state HOMO can align in phase with the other molecule's LUMO to enable the reaction
Key concept: orbital symmetry conservation governs whether a pericyclic reaction is allowed under given conditions
Practical Pericyclic Predictions: A Quick Guide
If the reacting pair would require mismatched phases in the ground state, expect a symmetry-forbidden thermal process
If photochemical activation is used, symmetry can be broken in a controlled way to allow otherwise forbidden processes
Use HOMO/LUMO interactions and phase matching to predict outcomes for cycloadditions and rearrangements
Practice: Predicting Products and Synthetic Routes
Typical exercises include proposing products for given dienes/dienophiles and designing routes to transform one molecule into another using pericyclic strategies
Consider conformation, stereochemistry, and regiochemistry to determine major products and viable synthetic steps
Review: Key Concepts to Memorize
Conjugation stabilizes dienes: for conjugation
VB vs MO: localized vs delocalized views of bonding; MOs explain delocalization and energy ordering
Frontier Orbitals: HOMO and LUMO drive reactivity and light absorption
UV-Vis: A = log(I0/I), ; λmax correlates with energy gap and degree of conjugation
Diels–Alder: [4+2] cycloaddition; endo vs exo; regioselectivity; stereospecificity; dienophile EWGs accelerate reaction
Pericyclic reactions: concerted, cyclic transition states; orbital symmetry conservation determines allowed vs forbidden pathways
Temperature influences kinetic vs thermodynamic control in conjugated-diene additions
[2+2] cycloadditions are symmetry-forbidden thermally but allowed photochemically via excited-state orbital interactions