Module 1: Anthropology - Quick Reference Notes
American Culture: Structure and Environment
SUPERSTRUCTURE
Worldview
Value Independence, Individualism
Self-expression, Choice, Freedom, Convenience and Personal Responsibility
SOCIAL STRUCTURE
Social Organization
Representative Democracy
Individual Rights & Laws
Love Marriage, Nuclear Families
High Mobility
INFRASTRUCTURE
Economy
Industrial / Post-industrial
High Division of Labor
Consumerist Market Economy
ENVIRONMENT
Capitalist Global Economy takes the whole earth as its environment
The four fields of anthropology
Sociocultural anthropology = living societies; ethnography (e.g., Wesch with the Nekalimin in New Guinea)
Ethnography in key ethnographers
Margaret Mead and two Samoan girls (1926) – Coming of Age in Samoa
Michael Wesch and Nekalimin man
The four fields of anthropology (summary)
Sociocultural anthropology = living societies; ethnography
Biological anthropology = human evolution, modern primates, human variation, disease
Linguistic anthropology = language and language use
Archaeology = past cultures
Note: classes about and professors for all four fields at JMU
Anthropological archaeology
The “past tense” of sociocultural anthropology
Archaeology done to answer anthropological questions
Goals of anthropological archaeology
Reconstruct culture histories (what happened when)
Look for patterns in development of human institutions (cross-cultural similarities)
Understand unique attributes of individual cultures (differences)
Find and understand factors that determined the course of human history
Apply knowledge of the past to present-day problems
The challenge: translating material remains to lived past
1) Remains are partial, fragmentary, and often disturbed by later cultures
2) Reason from Evidence → Inferences about past behavior
3) Inferences are theories; disagreement possible
4) We can never REALLY KNOW what happened
What is evidence? What is inference?
Evidence: objective data such as site layout, maps, replicable data (counts/weights), dates (radiocarbon), stratigraphy
Inferences: statements about past human behavior
Example: an inference about subsistence
Inference: “Rabbits, especially jacks (Lepus spp.), dominate the faunal assemblages from all time periods and probably comprised the bulk of all animal protein consumed by the Hohokam” (Masse 1991)
Question: How valid is this inference? What alternative inferences exist?
Evaluating the inference and alternatives
Assumptions: bone quantity on sites directly reflects protein intake
Alternative: other animals used for food were butchered away from sites; large animal bones may be rare on sites
Evidence to consider: processing marks, context, distribution of bones, use-wear on bones, tools, fur, etc.
Revised interpretation considerations
If rabbits were abundant because bones were used for tools or fur for clothing, expect evidence of processing and secondary use
Alternative inference: rabbits abundant due to consumption; verify with processing evidence and context