Lecture 4 Aquatic food web structure and the flow of carbon lecture slides, lecture
Page 1: Overview
Title: Aquatic food web structure and the flow of carbon
Authors: Vladimir Matveev and Barbara J. Robson
Affiliation: CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australia
Corresponding Author: barbara.robson@csiro.au
Publication Dates: Received 23 December 2013; Accepted 29 August 2014; Published 3 November 2014
Page 2: Carbon Cycling in Freshwater Ecosystems
Importance of Carbon Cycling:
Crucial for climate change, ecosystem health, and human activities.
Carbon can limit primary production even in CO2-supersaturated waters.
Net Heterotrophy:
Most lakes and rivers are net heterotrophic due to terrestrial carbon (allochthonous) subsidies.
Limitations of Terrestrial Carbon Utilization:
Low nutritional quality and inability of bacteria to synthesize PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty acids) essential for metazoans.
Role of Bacterivorous Nanoflagellates:
Can synthesize PUFAs, potentially linking terrestrial carbon to metazoan production.
Page 3: Influence of Food Web Structure
Food Web Structure and Carbon Dynamics:
Influences carbon fluxes, accumulation, distribution, burial, and sequestration.
Affects carbon emission/sequestration ratio, indicating whether an ecosystem acts as a carbon source or sink.
Significance of Small Lakes:
Dominant type of freshwater bodies with high carbon burial rates.
Impact of Human Activities:
Human activities modify productivity and food web structure, which could control carbon emissions.
Page 4: Introduction to Carbon Cycling
Global Importance of Carbon Cycling:
Essential for understanding global climate change and ecosystem transformations.
Inland waters significantly influence global carbon cycle, comparable to oceanic CO2 uptake.
Page 5: Food Web Structure's Role
Understanding Food Webs:
Essential for regulating the carbon cycle.
Aims of the paper:
Analyze carbon entry and processing in aquatic ecosystems.
Review influence of internal/external carbon sources.
Evaluate current models of carbon pathways in freshwater food webs.
Page 6: Biogeochemical Cycles - The Carbon Cycle
Carbon as Energy Currency:
Holds a large proportion of an organism’s mass (45-55% in plants and freshwater invertebrates).
Carbon bonds are key for energy transfer in aquatic ecosystems.
Page 7: Ecosystem Metabolism and Carbon Input
Lakes as Input-Output Systems:
Viewed as energy systems, not isolated entities.
Ecosystem Characteristics:
Contains autotrophic and heterotrophic components capturing energy, carbon, and nutrients.
Key Processes:
Primary production (carbon acquisition), secondary production (carbon transfer), decomposition (carbon re-mineralization), and respiration (carbon loss).
Page 8: Pathways of Carbon Input
Metabolic Gates for Carbon Entry:
Autochthonous primary production.
Microbial decomposition.
Consumption of live terrestrial organisms.
Consumption of dissolved organic carbon (DOC).
Consumption of imported detritus and colloidal microparticles.
Control of Carbon Mobilization:
Pathways dictate how carbon is mobilized and incorporated into ecosystem metabolism.
Page 9: Sources, Gates, and Sinks of Carbon
Table 1 Overview:
Sources: Atmospheric CO₂, terrestrial DOC, etc.
Gates: Autochthonous primary production, microbial respiration, consumption pathways.
Sinks: Respiration by plants and animals, burial in sediments.
Page 10: Bypassing Metabolic Gates
Charcoal's Role:
Can enter ecosystems bypassing metabolic gates.
Provides little nutritional value but alters sediment properties affecting benthic communities.
Page 11: Influence of Carbon Composition
Benthic Community Dynamics:
Affected by substratum particle size.
Recalcitrant carbon modifies ecosystem functioning indirectly.
Page 12: Carbon Balance and P/R Ratios
Defining Ecosystem Metabolism:
Primary production (P) vs. respiration (R) indicates ecosystem's carbon balance.
Positive NEP: Ecosystem accumulates carbon, acts as a CO2 sink.
Negative NEP: Ecosystem acts as a CO2 source.
Page 13: NEP Indicators
Heterotrophic Systems:
Most lake/river ecosystems are heterotrophic; median ratios for streams (approx. 0.5) and lakes (approx. 0.6).
Variability in P/R Ratios:
Conditions may lead to variant P/R ratios within the same system.
Page 14: P/R Ratios in Freshwaters
Variability by Location:
Shallow eutrophic lakes/rivers may show P/R ≥ 1 while oligotrophic lakes show P/R <1.
Factors Affecting Ratios:
Regions of elevated microbial decomposition may reveal different P/R ratios.
Page 15: P/R Ratios Dependency
Factors Contributing to Heterotrophy:
P/R ratios can reflect the ecosystem's reliance on external organic carbon.
Examples of Variability:
Example from the Murray River indicates P/R ratios can shift with flooding events.
Page 16: River Continuum Concept
P/R Variability Along Rivers:
P/R ratios differ in forested headwaters (<1) vs downstream regions (>1).
Ecosystem Changes:
Stressed ecosystems may demonstrate unbalanced P/R ratios.
Page 17: Reliability of P/R Ratios
Natural Variation of P/R Ratios:
Most freshwater ecosystems exhibit P/R < 1, questioning reliability as an ecosystem health indicator.
Effects of Fertilization and Acidification:
Human interventions can modify P/R ratios significantly.
Page 18: Food Web Concepts
Key Concepts:
River Continuum, Serial Discontinuity, Flood Pulse, Functional Process Zones.
Each concept describes different influences on food web functions and organism distribution based on environmental conditions.
Page 19: Types of Terrestrial Subsidies
Terrestrial Subsidies' Impact:
Reduced P/R ratios linked to terrestrial organic matter import.
Types of subsidies:
Terrestrial dissolved organic carbon (t-DOC)
Terrestrial particulate organic carbon (t-POC)
Live terrestrial prey (t-prey) consumed by aquatic animals.
Page 20: Terrestrial Organic Matter Dynamics
Bacterial Respiration Boosted:
t-DOC and t-POC provide substrates for microbial decomposition.
Marine carbon subsidies can also influence freshwater systems vastly, with t-DOC often exceeding POC significantly.
Page 21: Bioavailability of Terrestrial Organic Matter
Factors Affecting Bioavailability:
Origin and chemical form of organic matter.
Labile vs Recalcitrant DOC:
Labile DOC is readily utilized by bacteria, while recalcitrant DOC may be flocculated and stored.
Page 22: Bacterial Production and Metabolic Gates
DOC Consumption Role:
Major carbon flux in ecosystems, leading to bacterial production.
Mechanisms like photo-oxidation and photolysis help transfer recalcitrant carbon through metabolic gates.
Page 23: Consistency in Ecosystem Dynamics
Stabilization by Recalcitrant Carbon:
Maintains ecosystem dynamics by providing low-quality food sources.
Chromatic Dissolved Organic Material (CDOM):
Can inhibit photosynthesis, thus affecting nutrient cycling and primary production.
Page 24: Effects of Colored DOC
Impact on Benthic Algae:
Increased colored DOC can result in reduced photosynthesis and primary production.
Role of Humic Substances:
Important regulators of primary production in lakes.
Page 25: Carbon Limitation of Primary Production
Nutrient Limitation:
Phosphorus and nitrogen are critical limiting factors; carbon's role is less understood.
Super saturation of CO2 in Lakes:
Strong correlation between organic carbon and partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2).
Page 26: Revising Carbon Limitation Perspectives
New Insights on Carbon Limitation:
Even in CO2-supersaturated lakes, additional CO2 can boost production, suggesting it's a limiting factor.
Impact of Terrestrial Carbon Subsidies:
Changes in carbon input can noticeably affect primary productivity in freshwater lakes.
Page 27: Cultural Eutrophication
Definition:
Increased algal productivity driven by human activity, primarily through nutrient inputs.
Carbon co-limitation adds complexity to eutrophication understanding.
Page 28: Factors Influencing Phytoplankton Growth
Terrestrial DOC's Role:
Increase in phytoplankton productivity driven by carbon input, microbial activity is temperature-dependent.
Global Warming Effects:
Might accelerate CO2 release and primary production in freshwater ecosystems.
Page 29: Carbon Flux and Food Chains
Trophic Level Simplification:
Food chains represent carbon paths from primary producers to consumers.
Non-whole numbers reflect animals feeding at multiple levels.
Page 30: The Microbial Loop
Function of the Microbial Loop:
DOC feeds bacteria, facilitating a return flow of carbon to herbivore food chains.
Efficiency of Carbon Utilization:
Bacteria show greater growth efficiency on internal carbon compared to external carbon.
Page 31: Food Chain Length (FCL)
Definition:
FCL measures carbon transformation and energy use in an ecosystem.
Impacts of FCL:
Affects community structure and ecosystem functions, alongside contaminant accumulation.
Page 32: Human Activity and FCL Impact
FCL Variability:
Changes from human activities can affect various ecosystems based on their FCL, altering ecological dynamics.
Page 33: Primary Production's Effect on FCL
Influence of Ecosystem Size:
Lake size (volume) serves as a primary predictor of FCL rather than productivity levels.
Page 34: Omnivory in Food Webs
Understanding Omnivory:
Widespread in freshwater plankton, with organisms feeding across multiple trophic levels.
Dietary Changes in Consumers:
Ontogeny can influence diets, e.g., bony bram (Nematalosa erebi) changes from carnivorous to herbivorous.
Page 35: Key Terms in Carbon Cycling
Definitions:
Terms related to carbon cycling include food chain, herbivorous food chain, microbial food chain, etc.
Function of Each Term:
Describes roles in carbon movement through aquatic systems.
Page 36: Food Web Structure Effects
Impact on Ecosystem Functions:
FWS influences prey community size, carbon fluxes, nutrient recycling, productivity, and P/R balance in ecosystems.
Page 37: Control Mechanisms in Food Webs
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Controls:
Predators affect community structure and productivity; nutrient availability dictates primary productivity.
Manipulating fish community structures can significantly change water quality and ecosystem characteristics.
Page 38: Role of Top Predators
Impact on Carbon Fixation:
Top predators can reduce atmospheric carbon influx into lakes, influencing net autotrophy.
Fish Influence:
They play critical roles in phosphorus cycling and overall lake dynamics.
Page 39: Nutrient Recycling Dynamics
Role of Nutrient Enrichment:
Promotes primary production and makes lakes carbon sinks.
Interplay of food web structure and nutrient levels determines carbon sources or sinks.
Page 40: Ecological Efficiency in Food Chains
Trophic Transfer Efficiency (TTE):
Influences biomass production and water quality, quantifying efficiency at each trophic level.
Page 41: Evaluating TTE Across Ecosystems
Meta-Analysis Findings:
Typical TTE across aquatic ecosystems averages around 10%.
Page 42: Bacterial Carbon Controversy
Link or Sink Controversy:
Debate on whether bacteria serve as a nutrient source or a carbon sink, defined by their feeding interactions and contributions to carbon flow.
Page 43: Efficiency of Bacterial Grazing
Bacterial Biomass Control:
Ciliates can regulate bacterial populations, ensuring efficient carbon transfer between microbial groups.
Page 44: Carbon Flow Rates and Community Structure
Connections between Flow Rate and Community:
Community composition impacts carbon movement rates, influenced by environmental factors like temperature and organism size.
Page 45: Herbivory and Specific Production
Link to Primary Production:
Plant communities' properties significantly impact herbivory patterns due to palatability and production rates.
Page 46: General Conclusions
Key Takeaways from the Study:
Carbon cycling is crucial for ecosystem health and climate understanding.
Inland waters play a major role in the global carbon cycle.
Food Web Structures:
Regulate carbon flow; most ecosystems are net heterotrophic, relying on external carbon sources.
Page 47: Implications for Management
Small Lakes' Importance:
Crucial for carbon burial, often overlooked.
Management Strategies:
Human actions can significantly alter carbon cycling, and proper management could mitigate carbon emissions.