Seismic Hazards 5 - Mitigation
Seismic Hazard Reduction Strategies and Anti-Seismic Building Design
Learning Outcomes
- Assess strategies for reducing vulnerability to seismic hazards.
- Describe basic principles of anti-seismic building design (new builds or retrofits).
- Gain perspective on seismic and geological hazards from a political perspective.
Lecture Structure
- Land use planning and building regulations.
- Principles of anti-seismic design.
- Strengthening structures and materials.
- Insurance (briefly).
- Next Section: Early warning systems (functionality, limitations, strengths) and emergency response.
- Tsunami risk mitigation.
Building on Previous Lectures
- Previous sessions covered probabilistic models (based on earthquake catalogs).
- Objective: Prediction doesn't work, so we use probabilistic models.
- Hazard maps: color-coded probabilities of ground acceleration within specific time windows (e.g., 30 years, 475 years, 1 century).
- Risk assessment: relative levels of seismic risk in an area.
- Consideration of liquefaction through local surveys (e.g., Dhaka, Bangladesh).
Hazard Microzonation
- Hazard microzonation work should be micro-scale.
- Maps include the probability of exceeding a seismic intensity or peak ground acceleration threshold within a time window.
- Used for resource investment decisions.
- Identify areas prone to:
- Liquefaction.
- Landslides.
- Tsunamis.
- Fire potential (e.g., timber buildings).
- Infrastructure vulnerability (power lines, water).
- Nuclear power stations.
- Demographics: population characteristics (age, affluence).
- All factors combined ideally determine policy.
- Real-world policies are often not ideal, leading to suffering.
Example: Italy and Microzonation
- Focus: Central Italy (Apennine Mountains, faulting).
- Close to the L'Aquila earthquake zone (2009).
Seismic Hazard Map
- Purple zone: 10% chance of exceeding ground acceleration within 475-year return period.
- Corresponds to intensity 7-8.
- Village: Built on sediments at the foot of mountains thrust up by faulting.
Geology
- Variable geology: strong crystalline rocks (mountains) and soft sediments (village).
- Similar to volcanic contexts where sediments surround the volcano.
- Soft sediments amplify seismic waves.
Recent Study
- Lithological map: crystalline rocks vs. soft sediments.
- Boreholes: sunk to 30-35 meters.
- Measured in-situ S-wave velocity (V_s).
- Extremely slow V_s: Around 200 m/s in some zones.
- Crystalline rocks: V_s in kilometers per second.
- Contrast between fast and slow S-waves amplifies seismic signal.
2D Slice Model
- Mountains: higher S-wave velocities (around 1000 m/s).
- Sediments: far lower S-wave velocities.
Amplification Model
- Amplification ratio (AR) up to 3.5.
- Significant amplification in specific areas.
- Due to seismic wave wavelength and frequency.
- Strongest amplification: roughly 1 second period.
- Frequency-dependent and localized amplification.
Detailed Peak Ground Acceleration Model
- Red zones: 0.4g (very strong shaking).
- Caused by shallow sediments.
Regional Context
- Located in the highest seismic risk zone in Italy.
- 10% chance of exceeding 0.25g within 50 years.
- National maps used for decisions on enforcing seismic codes.
European Coordination
- Similar images constructed for many European countries coordinated by the European Commission.
- Each country has its own way of representing seismic hazard.
- Combined at a continental scale with integrated language.
- Grunenthal et al.: Probabilistic model showing peak ground acceleration with a certain return period.
- Red areas around Romania, Turkey, Italy, Greece.
Regulatory Building Codes
- Codes stipulate construction types based on anticipated seismic shaking strength.
- By 2002, many countries had established codes.
- European codes cover new buildings, bridges, retrofitting, tanks, pipelines.
- Mandatory level depends on seismic hazard.
- Codes are based on acceptable risk (pragmatic approach).
PBSD (Performance Based Seismic Design)
Balances cost with safety.
Minor earthquakes: no damage.
Strongest earthquakes: some degree of resilience.
Matrix: Seismic shaking intensity (very rare to frequent) vs. Performance level (fully operational to near collapse).
Acceptability thresholds:
- Frequent events: no damage.
- Rarest events: near collapse.
- Next level: life safety in strongest events.
- Safety-critical: full operation even in very rare events.
Consultancy Reports
- Ninhus report for the UK government: global and regional overview.
- Focuses on low-income countries and their vulnerability due to lack of resources.
- Reviews regulation and effectiveness of seismic building codes.
- Addresses code enforcement.
Key Idea
- Earthquakes don't kill people, buildings do.
- No natural disasters, but governmental failures.
Example: New Zealand
- Seismically active and affluent country with a great system.
- National system categorizes areas into high, medium, and low seismic risk.
- Sets timeframes for seismic work on prone buildings.
Anti-Seismic Design Principles
- Understand ground shaking and building response.
- Consider amplitudes and frequencies.
- Link structure and building response.
- Buildings have their fundamental frequency (related to dimensions).
- Resonance = Damage.
- Strengthening processes or isolation/damping systems can reduce damage.
Fundamental Frequency
- Matterhorn example: edifice shakes and moves slightly in response to earthquakes.
Building Resonance
- Taller buildings have lower fundamental frequencies.
- Rooftop pools slosh due to building resonance.
- Fundamental frequency ≈ 10 Hz / number of floors.
- High-rise buildings have periods of multiple seconds.
Demonstration
- Different building types have different fundamental frequencies of oscillation.
- Local amplification of different wavelengths and frequencies of seismic energy.
Strengthening Structures
Ideal Structure
- Symmetrical with balanced forces.
- Continuous structure with given height-width ratio (less than 4).
- Avoid pencil-thin buildings.
- Avoid extensions with different mechanical behavior.
- Well-connected structural elements (e.g., steel frame binding walls).
- Continuous panels.
- Cross bracing (triangular style linking adjacent columns).
Soft Story
- Particularly dangerous; lacking cross bracing.
Building Materials
- Timber: high strength, high ductility, lightweight (good for earthquakes).
- Steel: expensive but good (modern buildings in wealthy countries).
- Reinforced concrete: concrete pillars with steel struts (okay-ish).
- Unreinforced concrete/brick/clay/adobe: heavy and weak (prone to failure).
Examples of Damaged Buildings
- Adobe structure in Peru.
- Brick school building in Utah.
Upgrading Old Buildings
- Retrofitting is cheaper than rebuilding.
- Considers cultural importance of buildings.
- Outdated construction is responsible for multiple deaths.
Low-Cost Structures for Developing Countries
- Smart Shelter Foundation: hollow concrete blocks with horizontal bands.
- Used for school buildings in Nepal that survived the 2015 Gorkha earthquake.
High-Budget Solutions
- Skyscrapers balanced on rubber pads (decoupling).
- Kinks in pipelines to accommodate seismic slip.
- Damping systems (syringe with sticky fluid).
- Dynamic control systems (e.g., 730-ton pendulum in Taipei).
Earthquake Insurance
- Sold separately with a big deductible (typically 15%).
- Less than 20% of households in Japan and California have earthquake insurance.
- Insurance industry employs hazard assessors.
Culture of Preparedness
- Public awareness through schoolwork, public TV, social media, etc.
- Drills (e.g., under tables in schools).
- Posters with instructions (e.g., Dominica).
- Gap between seismic knowledge and action.
Next steps
- Lecture by Guninch on political economy and community impact.