Substance dualism (Descartes) is the view that the mind and body are fundamentally distinct substances:
The mind is a non-physical, thinking substance.
The body is a physical, extended substance.
They interact, but they are separate in nature.
Physicalism is the view that everything, including the mind, is entirely physical.
Mental states (thoughts, emotions) are brain states.
There are no non-physical substances or properties.
Epiphenomenalism is the idea that mental states are byproducts of physical brain activity but do not cause anything.
Example: Pain is caused by nerve activity but does not itself cause behavior (e.g., screaming).
Mental states are effects, not causes.
A. physicalism ✅
Behaviorism says mental states are just behaviors or dispositions to behave, making it a physicalist theory.
Substance dualism: Mind and body are separate substances (Descartes).
Property dualism: The mind is not a separate substance but has non-physical properties (Jackson).
Physicalism: The mind is fully physical; mental states = brain states.
I can conceive of my mind existing without my body.
If I can conceive it, it is possible.
If it is possible, then mind and body are distinct substances.
Premise 1: If physicalism is true, then all knowledge is physical knowledge.
Premise 2: Mary learns something new when she leaves the black-and-white room.
Conclusion: Therefore, not all knowledge is physical knowledge, so physicalism is false.
Mary is a scientist who knows everything physical about color but has only seen black and white.
When she sees red for the first time, she learns something new (what red looks like).
Point: Supports Premise 2 of the Knowledge Argument—there is non-physical knowledge.
She doesn’t know what it is like to see color—specifically, the qualia (subjective experience) of red.
Churchland argues that Mary doesn’t gain new knowledge but a new ability—the ability to recognize colors.
Knowing facts vs. having new experiences.
C. Jackson ✅
Jackson argues that mental properties (like qualia) are non-physical, making him a property dualist.
Similarity: Both accept that the mind is non-physical.
Difference:
Epiphenomenalism: The mind does not affect the body.
Interactionism: The mind does affect the body.
A. Turing ✅
Alan Turing proposed the Imitation Game, which led to the Turing Test for machine intelligence.
A person (Judge) must distinguish between a man and a woman through text-based questions.
If the judge can’t tell who is who, the imitation succeeds.
Players: A human judge, a human, and a machine.
Goal: The judge must determine which is the machine.
Turing Test: If a machine successfully imitates human conversation, it is intelligent.
✅ A. A digital computer is a syntactic machine, while thinking presupposes intentionality (semantic content).
Searle argues that computers manipulate symbols (syntax) but don’t understand meaning (semantics).
A person inside a room follows symbol manipulation rules (like a computer processing input).
From the outside, it looks like the person understands Chinese, but they don’t.
Point: Computers do not have real understanding—just symbol processing.
✅ C. He is able to distinguish two types of red.
Fred sees two distinct shades of red that normal humans can’t.
Point: Suggests there are extra (non-physical) mental properties.
✅ B. According to the identity theory, pain is identical to a brain state, namely C-fiber firing.
Identity Theory says mental states = specific brain states (pain = C-fiber firing).This implies that mental experiences can be fully explained through physical processes, challenging the notion of dualism which posits a separation between the mind and body.