Interview Types
1. Ethnographic Interviews
Nature of Interviews:
- Informal conversational interviews
- Emergent and spontaneous
- Occur in the fieldCharacteristics:
- Simulates a casual exchange, but instigated by the researcher
- Purposeful dialogues that may not occur otherwiseExamples of Contexts:
- Consulting at home parties during breaks about work-life balance topics
- Speaking with correctional officers during graveyard shifts of boredom
- Interviewing tourists while they wait for tour buses
- Engaging young parents in amusement parksPurpose:
- To pass time and elicit valuable information during unstructured moments
2. Informant Interviews
Definition:
- Participants characterized as veterans, experienced insiders, and key connectors in specific cultural scenesEthical Considerations:
- Should seek insights from various informants for credibility rather than one or twoCharacteristics:
- Friendly, willing participants who hold cultural capital
- Importance of developing long-term relationships for rapportIllustration:
- Littenman (2010) built rapport with wheelchair rugby players, gathering invaluable insights about masculinity in disability contexts
3. Respondent Interviews
Definition:
- Interviews conducted among social actors in similar subject positions with experiences relevant to research goalsKey Features:
- Unlike informants, respondents primarily speak for themselves
- May reveal similarities and differences within cultural groupsExample of Context:
- Respondents working in Nevada's legal brothels, evaluating their job responsibilities
4. Narrative Interviews
Nature:
- Open-ended, unstructured interviews encouraging personal stories rather than straightforward answersSubtypes:
- Oral histories focus on reconstruction of past events, especially marginalized perspectives
- Life story interviews or biographic interviews prompt discussions about a participant's entire lifeExample of Oral History:
- Davis (2007) interviewed Black women who survived the 1921 Tulsa massacreLife Story Importance:
- Useful for understanding and creating empathy for socially aberrant individuals (e.g., serial killers)
5. Discursive Interviews
Definition:
- Examine the influence of power structures on the construction of knowledge and truthCharacteristics:
- Engages with societal discourses, eliciting deeper understanding of participant viewsExample:
- Rivera Tracy (2012) studied US Border Patrol agents’ compassion towards undocumented immigrants, influenced by ancestry connections
Interview Stances
1. Naive Stance
- Definition:
- Requires interviewers to refrain from presuppositions and be open to unexpected findings - Importance of Emotional Tone:
- Tailor approach based on power relations and sensitivity of the topic
2. Collaborative Stance
- Nature:
- Jointly constructed interviews, equal exchange of questions between researcher and participant - Case Example:
- Carolyn Ellis and Jerry Rawicki in Holocaust education, co-editing narratives from discussions over two years
3. Pedagogical Stance
- Definition:
- Interviewer encourages knowledge sharing to participants while gathering insights - Example Application:
- Researchers may share educational insights after interviewing sexual assault victims
4. Responsive Stance
- Ethics:
- Honors participants through respectful behavior and acknowledges researcher biases - Philosophical Foundation:
- Linked with feminist ethics for creating therapeutic narratives
5. Confrontational Stance
- Nature:
- Deliberate provocation to highlight differences in opinions and power dynamics - Context Consideration:
- Ethical caution with vulnerable participants; may be useful with confident, elite participants - Strategy for Questions:
- Save more confrontational questions for the end of the interview
Interview Structure
1. Interview Guides vs. Schedules
- Interview Schedules:
- Standardized script of questions for uniformity across multiple researchers - Interview Guides:
- Flexible, less formal question lists for dynamic interviews
2. Research Considerations
- Pre-Interview Planning:
- Revisiting project goals, research questions, and existing literature is vital prior to designing interviews - Designing Questions:
- Clarify if interviews aim to explore: new findings, test hypotheses, gather opinions, or collect factual data
Wording Good Interview Questions
Characteristics of Effective Questions
- 1. Simplicity:
- Avoid jargon and keep questions free from abbreviations - 2. Singular Focus:
- Ask one question at a time; avoid double-barreled inquiries - 3. Concrete Detail:
- Encourage narrative recollection over general memories - 4. Neutrally Worded:
- Maintain nonleading phrasing of questions - 5. Respect Identity:
- Uphold participants’ preferred identity while framing questions - 6. Follow-ups and Probes:
- Encourage elaboration with specific prompts
Types of Interview Questions
- Opening Questions
- Break the ice and set expectations
- e.g., "Thank you for agreeing to meet with me today. I have scheduled an hour together. Does that still work for you?" - Generative Questions
- Non-directive questions that generate discussions - Timeline Questions
- Seek understanding of chronological sequences - Hypothetical Questions
- Explore imagined scenarios - Behavior/Action Questions
- Seek factual behavior-related responses - Compare/Contrast Questions
- Generate contrasts between situations - Motive Questions
- Focus on understanding reasons behind actions - Directive Questions
- Structure interviews for specific areas of information
Closing the Interview
- Catch-All Questions:
- Address loose ends or unfinished stories at the end
- e.g., "Is there anything that you wish people knew about your role that you haven't told me yet?" - Expressing Gratitude:
- Thank participants for their time and contributions
Visual, Embodied, and Experimental Approaches to Interviews
1. Elicitation Questions
- Use material objects, images, or videos to prompt discussions
2. Think Aloud Method
- Participants vocalize their thoughts during activities; great for exploratory insights
3. Mobile Interviews
- Conduct interviews while traveling, observing contextual environments
4. Instructions to the Double
- Participants write instructions for a substitute replicating their roles, eliciting detailed experiences
Determining Number of Interviews for Saturation
- Published Recommendations:
- Range from 60-100, but appropriate number depends on research goals - Case Considerations:
- Sample size impacts saturation; defining narrower criteria can reduce number required - Sequential Interviews:
- Allows adaptability and efficiency in reaching saturation
Studies and Recommendations
- Guest et al. (2006) indicate that 12 interviews may suffice for shared beliefs in homogeneous groups