week 12 lecture pscy2011
Introduction
Overview of the course relations to the criminal justice system and scientific contributions.
Focus on reforms influenced by scientific advancements in areas like eyewitness testimony and forensic science.
Shift towards the future implications of introducing new techniques in the criminal justice process.
FMRI Evidence in Criminal Justice
Definition and Purpose
FMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) is debated in its use as evidence in court.
Potential to inform jurors and judges about defendants' behaviors, like impulsivity.
Concerns
Risk of FMRI evidence being overly prejudicial.
Scientific allure potentially sways juror and judge decision-making processes.
Persuasion Effects
Brain imaging is perceived as concrete evidence, similar to fingerprints.
Psychologically, people trust concrete evidence more than abstract concepts.
Perception of Science
Natural vs. Behavioral Science
People tend to trust findings from natural sciences over behavioral sciences.
Studies indicate that people rate scientific research as more credible when it uses natural science methods.
Study Example
Scenarios comparing natural science (e.g., cell biology using EKG) to behavioral science (social interactions using questionnaires).
Results show that the method of study influences perceived credibility and importance.
The Persuasiveness of Brain Images
Influence of Visual Evidence
Studies indicate that showing images related to claims enhances belief in those claims.
Non-probative images can sway people’s judgments without providing true evidence.
Marketing Influence
Media campaigns (e.g., No Lie fMRI) can mislead jurors about the reliability of FMRI evidence.
Empirical Research on FMRI Evidence
McCabe Study
Examined how people react to brain images versus bar graphs summarizing the same information.
Results revealed that brain images significantly influenced perceptions of scientific reasoning.
Implications for Conviction
Judgment outcomes suggested higher guilty verdict proportions when FMRI is introduced alongside prosecution arguments.
Behavioral Genetics
Basic Concepts
Advances suggest modest connections between gene variants, childhood experiences, and criminal behavior.
Ethical concerns regarding genetic information might reduce perceived responsibility in defendants.
Study Example
Scenarios presented examining impulsive homicide explanations, leading to varying sentencing and fear responses.
Longer prison sentences correlated more with abuse history than genetic factors.
Probability in Criminal Justice
Importance of Base Rates
Effective communication of forensic evidence requires understanding match probabilities and base rates.
Rarity adds weight to forensic findings (e.g., DNA evidence reliability increases with uniqueness).
Presentation of Evidence
Different methods of presenting evidence (likelihood ratios vs. random match probabilities) significantly impact juror decision-making.
Research shows jurors respond better to random match probabilities.
Impact of Technology in Criminal Justice
Future Investigations
Potential of machine learning to reduce human biases in decision-making processes.
Virtual courtrooms may provide new avenues for legal proceedings, prompting questions around empathy and engagement.
Sensor Technology
Acoustic sensors like ShotSpotter allow immediate police response by detecting gunfire locations.
Conclusion
Integration of psychology and law shows potential for addressing criminal justice system issues.
Emphasizes the importance of psychological research in influencing legal practices.
Encourages continuous investigation into the influence of new technologies and information presentations within the criminal justice landscape.