Human Development and Learning
Week 1:
Learning about learning:
Human beings are learning machines, but it takes us some years before we become aware of this
In the womb and in the years before a human speaks, the mind or brain seems to be on automatic pilot - making connections, building pathways, making meaning of the inputs of our senses
Behaviourist orientations
Behaviourism: explanations of learning concerned with the effect of external events on behaviour
Learning: permanent or relatively permanent changes in individuals that result from instruction or experience
Behaviour: actions that are observable and measurable
Tabula rasa: the notion that the mind of an infant is a clean slate. The new born knows nothing but it has the potential to learn and experience as a result of an innate ability to perceive and build associations
Classical conditioning:
Traditional learning and testing stems from classical conditioning
is the association of an automatic response with a new stimulus
Albert and the white rat
Behaviourist John B Watson conducted an experiment with an 11 month baby where they conditioned “Albert” to fear a white rat. The rat was introduced to Albert and with the introduction of new stimuli especially a fluffy animal, the toddler was happy and formed a bond. The rat was the later taken out of the basket and when Albert would reach for it, a large bar would bang to create a loud sound and create fear in Albert and form a phobia of furry animals.
Proof that we can actually condition humans like animals
Operant Conditioning
The use of positive and negative consequences to strengthen or weaken voluntary behaviour
Concerned with behaviour that is conscious, intentional or voluntary
A learner’s behaviour triggers a sequence of events that leads to a positive or negative outcome, and to learning
Consequences
Reinforcement is an event that strengthens behaviour; it has the effect of increasing the frequency of the behaviour it follows:
Positive reinforcement: increases the likelihood of a behaviour occurring by contingent presentation of a reward immediately following it (e.g. a lolly or pocket money)
Negative reinforcement increases the likelihood of a behaviour being repeated by contingently removing an aversive object or activity (e.g. no homework or no chores)
Strengths and limitations of operant conditioning
Strengths:
Provides educators with simple but effective strategies that can be used easily to teach new skills and behaviours quickly and efficiently
Particularly helpful for teaching action sequences that need to be performed at an automatic level
Helpful for managing undesirable behaviour, especially in classrooms
Limitations:
Neglects the contribution of cognition and cognitive skills to learning process, especially for more complex forms of behaviour such as problem-solving
Concerns about the impact of long-term dependence on extrinsic, rather than intrinsic, forms of reinforcement
Ethical issues with the use of some types of punishment and aversive techniques
Cognitive orientations:
Cognitive learning theory: concerned with the internal mental processes and how learners manipulate information during learning
Primary concern is with making meaning out of information and experience; and how learners manipulate both new and familiar information
Learning is achieved through processing and storing knowledge and skills in one’s mind in such a way that they can be recalled and used at a later time when needed
Humanistic orientations
Humanism is a system of thought that is predominantly concerned with the human experience rather than with the spiritual aspects of life
It is a general orientation to life or a personal philosophy that recognises the uniqueness of human beings and the qualities of life that contribute to our humanity
Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs

Strengths and limitations of Maslow’s hierarchy
Strengths
Maslow’s work has had a significant and continuing impact on education
Focus is on student needs in a learning situation rather than those of the teacher or curriculum
Attention is on meeting students’ basic needs for food, safety and belonging
Emotional aspects of students’ experiences and motivation are emphasised, rather than academic achievement
Limitations
Critics argue that the hierarchical sequence of needs does not always apply
Terms such as “self-actualisation” are vague
It is difficult to measure whether some needs have been met