Agenda Setting - W5
Policy Agenda - issues, problems that are currently at the forefront of our policy makers, is metaphorical
Models:
→ Kingdom Three Streams → convergence of these three streams
Problems - attention lurches to policy problem
Policies - a solution to the problem is available
Politics - government and party priorities come in, policymakers have the motive and opportunity to turn solution into policy
→ Soup
dont know what policies is going to result in, trial and error
→ Funnel of Causality
all involved
political machinery everything everywhere all at once
contains politically relevant incidents plus formal policy conversion & historic-geographic ocnditions, soceio-economic composition, mass political behaviour, governmental institutions, elite behavioour to make a policy output
→ Punctuated Equibilurium
agenda setting and policy process
normal phase (equiblirium)
critical phase (punctuations)
Public Sphere - conceptual format to help understand society
Incrementalism is the status quo, doesn’t necessarily have to be for or against
Policy Problem, Importance, Assumptions
Racist, xenophobic but also needed the immigration for tourism, economic reasons, labour, workforce. Important, one, de-escalate racist rhetoric and increase ethnic diversification, immigration program
Actors, Institutions, Role, Input
Whitlam Labor Government,
Growing multiculturalism
Department of Immigration
Public Pressure
Shift in immigration demographic (only small numbers of asian immigrants meant no use to the White Australia Policy)
vote allowance for indigenous populations
How did the problem come about, how is it represented and portrayed, impacts of representation
Public and economic pressure of the negative portrayals of the White Australia Policy
Deformalisation was seen as act of altruism and humanitarianism towards the racist rhetoric against non-white Australians, portrayed as policies supporting ethnic communities
impacts included immigration numbers surged, immigration policy regime, department of immigration and ethnic affairs
SIlences
No account for indigenous population, possibly still assimilation,
____________________________________________________________________
Building Nuclear Waste Facility:
Main Arguments and Counter Arguments
Cheap energy, financially friendly, more jobs, decreased unemployment, increased immigration, education opportunity for children
Dangerous, fossil fuel comparable, increased immigration, chance to use nuclear fuel for weaponery
How Will This Play Out for Different Groups
Elders: safety beacuse of past experiences, may not want it because of weaponery
Builders:
Primary School Kids:
Green Party: Not for it
Strategies and Policy Settings for Public Support
Soft Force:
Techniques and Strategies to Build Support
Building roblox games, meme-ify, VR / In
Soft Force: inception of mentioning it in school
News coverage of nuclear energy and its benefits
media coverage,
TIMELINE:
→ Federation
→ Goldrush (1850’s)
→ White Australia Policy (1860’s)
Problem - racist and xenophobic rhetoric
→ Formalisation of White Australia Policy (1901)
→ Immigration Program / WW2 / 10% Migration Increase from other European States (1940’s)
→ Start of the De-formalisation of the White Australia Policy (1960’s)
→ Whitlam Labor discontinued White Australia Policy and start of multiculturalism (1973)
→ Formalisation of immigration policy scheme, citizenship test, and humanitarianism (1976)
→ Mandatory asylum seekers detention implementation (1992)
→ Mandatory Detention went off-shore and was formalised (1996 - 2001)
→ Rudd / Gillard Government temporary halt to mandatory detention (2007)
→ Operation Sovereign Borders instated due to Coalition Party as prior Labor government reinstated mandatory detention - ‘stop the boats (2010-13)
→ Scomo forced to include medical treatment for asylum seekers, and some asylum seekers would be sent to US (2019)
Assignment:
→ learn stuff you learnt in class in policy pitch
→ integrate what model you are using for agenda setting within pitch
→ analyse content