chapter 17: monopolistic competition
Long-Run Economic Profits Across Market Structures
Perfect Competition (PC)
In the long run .
Economic profit ("normal" profit only).
Price sits at the very lowest point of the average-cost curve—"the cheapest you could make it and still stay in business."
Monopolistic Competition (MC)
Long-run price remains above the minimum average cost.
Despite that markup, entry drives economic profit to in the long run.
Monopoly (M)
Entry is blocked, so the firm can sustain \pi > 0 indefinitely.
Graphically, the monopolist’s is set along the demand curve where , leaving an “economic-profit rectangle” .
Profit-Maximization Rule (All Market Structures)
Universal rule: produce the output where .
Holds in short run & long run for PC, MC, and Monopoly.
Short-Run vs Long-Run Profit Possibilities
Short run: all three structures can earn positive economic profit.
Long run:
Perfect Competition → No (entry drives profit to zero).
Monopolistic Competition → No (imitators & close substitutes bring profit to zero).
Monopoly → Yes (barriers to entry protect profit).
Pricing Outcomes
Perfect Competition → Lowest possible price (price equals marginal & minimum average cost).
Monopolistic Competition → Intermediate price (markup over cost but below monopoly price).
Monopoly → Highest price (single firm with market power maximizes profit).
Efficiency Considerations
Efficiency means producing at the lowest Average Total Cost (ATC).
Perfect Competition → Yes (by definition in long-run equilibrium).
Monopolistic Competition → No (excess capacity; output is left of minimum-ATC quantity).
Monopoly → No (operates where P > MC and typically to the left of minimum ATC).
Why So Much Variety Under Monopolistic Competition?
Constant innovation: new cuts, colors, designs in clothing, shoes, bicycles, etc.
Consumers value individual expression → willing & able to pay for variety.
Producers’ incentive: shifting their firm-specific demand curve rightward/outward prolongs or revives positive economic profit.
By differentiating, they escape (temporarily) the long-run zero-profit outcome.
Result: higher prices vs perfect competition but greater product diversity.
Advertising & Branding in Monopolistic Competition
Essential because products are differentiated.
Objectives
Shift firm’s demand outward (more buyers at each price).
Create brand loyalty → reduces elasticity of demand → increases market power.
Sustain or increase economic profits above “normal.”
Functions of advertising
Inform about price, quality, availability.
Act as a signal of product quality ("if a firm spends a lot, product must be good").
Shape tastes/preferences (persuasion).
Subsidize or lower consumer costs for other goods/services (e.g., free Google services funded by ads).
Advertising for Undifferentiated (Homogeneous) Goods
Firms in perfect competition rarely advertise individually—benefits spill over to rivals.
Industry-level (generic) campaigns instead:
"Pork – The Other White Meat" (entire pork industry).
Cotton promotion campaigns (encourage buying any cotton clothing).
"Got Milk?"—initially for fluid milk when branding was minimal.
Over time, milk diversified (organic, vitamin-enriched, “happy cow” milk), so brand advertising became feasible and generic ads faded.
Numerical & Graphical Reminders
Perfect Competition (long run): and .
Monopolistic Competition (long run): P > \text{min } ATC,\; P = ATC \Rightarrow \pi = 0.
Monopoly: Chooses where , charges on the demand curve above that , so P > MC and \pi = (P - ATC)Q > 0.
Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications
Trade-off between efficiency & variety: consumers accept higher prices and some inefficiency for the benefit of diverse choices.
Advertising can enhance information but can also manipulate tastes—raises questions about consumer autonomy and social welfare.