Management Control - COB 300
What to Control?
Six Areas of Control
Physical (buildings, equipment)
Human resources (hiring, productivity, culture, satisfaction)
Informational (forecasts, production schedules)
Financial (funding, expenses, budget)
Structural (hierarchy, reporting lines)
Cultural (norms, values, law abidance, collaboration)
The Control Process
Establishment of clear standards of performance
Comparing performance to those standards
Corrective action to repair performance deficiencies
The control process is:
Dynamic (continuous over time)
Three basic methods:
feedforward control
concurrent control
feedback control
Control isn’t always worthwhile or possible or you catch some but not all problems
Types of Organizational Control
Preliminary (Feedforward Control)
Focused on organizational inputs
Anticipate and prevent deviation from standards
Be proactive
Example: preventive maintenance on equipment
Concurrent Control
Focused on the transformation of inputs to outputs
“In-process” or “screening” control applied during the transformation process
Problems identified and addressed as they occurs
Example: sampling output from product line
Reword (Feedback Control)
Focused on outputs
Fixing a defective output (after product is produced)
Used when preliminary and concurrent controls failed
Example: touch up of car paint scratched during production or shipping. Editing a document with errors
Damage Control
Focused on customer stakeholder satisfaction
Actions to minimize negative impacts on stakeholders due to faulty outputs
Example: Recalls, compensation, settling lawsuits
Effective Control Systems
Controls should focus on key activities
Critical success factors (CSFs)
Controls must be timely
Information should be available to employees in time to take action
Controls are not likely to be 100% effective or possible
Controls may blind us to moral wisdom
Control Isn’t Always Worthwhile or Possible
Regulation costs (cost/value analysis—worth it?)
Cybernetic feasibility (can you implement each step? If one or more steps cannot be implemented, it fails
You can’t control for everything (Expense reports example)
Standards
Must enable goal achievement
Listen to customer’s comments complaints, and suggestions
Benchmarking
Determining other companies’ standards
Comparison to Standards
The quality of the comparison depends largely on the measurement
The better the system, the easier it is for a company to track performance and identify problems that need to be fixed
Is the final product identical to the standard?
Corrective Action
Identify performance deviations
Analyze deviations
Development and implement corrective programs
Effective Control Systems (cont.)
Controls must be effective
The benefits must be worth the cost of installation and operation
Controls should be accurate
Measurement of quantity and quality allows for meaningful comparisons
Controls should be accepted by the people they affect
Employees must be educated regarding usefulness and benefits
5 basic methods for control
Bureaucratic Control
Managers try to influence employee behavior by rewarding or punishing
Managers emphasize following rules
Companies are highly resistant to change and slow to respond to customers and competitors
Objective Control
The use of observable measures of employee behavior or output to assess performance and influence behavior
Behavior control
Measures workers’ behaviors
Output control
Measures quantifiable results
Must be reliable, fair, and accurate
Warning:
Be careful you don’t ignore one of the two because the other one is ok
Normative Controls
A company’s widely shared values and beliefs guide workers’ behavior and decisions
Control through widely shared beliefs and values
Created by…
Who companies hire
Corporate culture
Observing experienced employees
Concertive Controls
Instead of being based on strong organizational culture as in normative control, concertive control is based on beliefs that are shaped and negotiated by work groups
Self- Control: YOU are in the driver’s seat
Managers and workers control their own behavior
Listen more
Dispute irrational beliefs
Keep the ego in check...it’s often NOT about you!
Be the change you want to see
Balanced Scorecard: An integrated framework
Originally designed to evaluate strategies from four perspectives:
Financial (sales, profits, ROI)
Customer (satisfaction, market share)
Internal processes (productivity, quality, cost reduction)
Learning and growth (R & D) or Innovation and learning perspective
Controlling Financial Performance
Cash flow analysis
Balance sheets
Income Statements
Financial ratios
Budgets
Economic Value Added
Not the same thing as profits..
The amount by which profits exceed the cost of capital in a given year
EVA is positive when company’s profits exceed the cost of capital in a given year
Includes the cost of capital
Controlling Customer Defections
Companies can do a better job of answering “How do customers see us?” by identifying which customers are leaving the company and measuring the rate at which they are leaving
Customers who have left are much more likely than current customers to tell you what you were doing wrong
Not always part of a company’s traditional approach to control, but it SHOULD BE
The worth of the brutal facts
Which customer is likely to give you more useful feedback?
Ferruccio Lamborghini to Enzo Ferrari:
“Pazzo, vi mostrerò, la tua macchina è una merda!!”
Controlling Quality
Quality is measured in three ways
Excellence (unsurpassed performance & features)
Advantages
Being/providing the “best” motivates and inspires managers and employees
Disadvantages
Excellence is ambiguous. What is it? Who defines it?
Value (good value for money as perceived by customer)
Advantages
Appeals to customers who know excellence “when they see it”
Customers recognize differences in value
Easier to measure and compare whether products/services differ in value
Disadvantages
Difficult to measure and control
Can be difficult to determine what factors influence whether a product/service is seen as having value
Controlling the balance between excellence and cost can be difficult
Conformance to specifications (measure up to standards)
Advantages
If specification can be written, conformance to specifications is usually measurable
Should lead to increase efficiency
Promotes consistency in quality
Disadvantages
Many products/services cannot be easily evaluated in terms of conformance to specifications
Promotes standardization, so may hurt performance when adapting to changes is more important
May be less appropriate for services, which are dependent on a high degree of human contact
Controlling Waste and Pollution
Waste prevention and reduction
good housekeeping
material/product substitution
process modification
Recycle and reuse
Waste treatment
Waste disposal
Michael Porter:
“Companies that don’t pollute are more efficient and therefore save money...”