Notes on Audience Objectives and Crisis Communications

Audience Objectives and Audience-Centered Messaging

Audience objectives defined as the audience’s needs or incentives for paying attention to our messages, i.e., the "what's in it for me?".
This is a crucial aspect of outreach and persuasion often overlooked in media relations; understanding audience needs makes message crafting easier and more effective.
Key audience groups to consider in media relations include:
- Reporters
- Editors
- Producers
- Bloggers
- Influencers
Implications for practice:
- Tailor messages to align with audience interests and constraints.
- Choose channels and formats that satisfy audience preferences and information needs.
- Integrate audience insight into planning and execution to improve engagement and credibility.

The final point emphasized: be as transparent as possible with all groups and audiences important to the organization.
Rationale and potential benefits:
- Builds trust and legitimacy for the organization.
- Reduces misinformation and speculation.
- Supports ethical standards and long-term reputational resilience.
Practical implication: transparency should be embedded across all stakeholder interactions, from internal teams to external audiences (media, partners, communities).

Scenario setup:
- You are at a midsized public university that has developed a new cybersecurity program.
- Goals: grow enrollment and improve the state's economic health by producing a trained workforce in a needed area.
Instruction to the reader (exam prompt):
- Place your own university into this scenario.
- Consider: your state, other universities in the state, current and potential student population, important corporations and industries.
- Question to answer: how would you target your media relations communication? What types of media vehicles would you use and why? Think both traditional and digital.
- Decision questions: would you limit outreach geographically, target your whole state, or reach outside state boundaries? For each option, explain why you made the decision.
Approach to solving the Challenge Case (guidance derived from prompt):
- Identify target audiences and what they care about (audience objectives).
- Determine appropriate messages that address enrollment, workforce needs, and economic impact.
- Select a mix of media vehicles (see next section) and justify choices for traditional vs. digital channels.
- Decide geographic scope of outreach (local/state/national/international) and rationales for each scope.
- Structure the outreach plan to align with stakeholder interests and the university’s strategic goals.

Instruction note from the prompt: think about the types of media vehicles you would use and why, including both traditional and digital options.
Traditional media vehicles (examples to consider):
- Newspapers (local and regional)
- Television and radio segments (local markets)
- Campus events, open houses, press conferences
- Press releases distributed through established media chains
Digital media vehicles (examples to consider):
- Social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, LinkedIn)
- University blogs and resident expert columns
- Podcasts and webinars
- Video content (short-form and long-form) distributed on owned channels and through influencer partnerships
Rationale for mixed use:
- Traditional outlets can reach broad and diverse audiences, lend legitimacy, and support local engagement.
- Digital channels provide targeted reach, interactive engagement, and cost-effective amplification; enable real-time updates and analytics.

Options to consider:
- Limited geographic reach (local community or campus area)
- State-wide outreach
- Outreach beyond the state (regional, national, or international)
For each option, explain the reasoning (as prompted by the challenge case):
- How does scope align with enrollment goals, workforce needs, and economic impact objectives?
- What are the competitive dynamics (other universities in the state) and collaboration opportunities with local industries?
- What are the logistical considerations (budget, partnerships, messaging localization, language/dialect differences, regulatory environment)?
Key consideration: balance reach with relevance and resource constraints; tailor content to audience segments within each geographic scope.

Coombs, T. (2019). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (5th ed.). Thousand
Fearn-Banks, K. (2016). Crisis communications: A casebook approach (5th edition). New York, NY: Routledge. CA: SAGE.
Fink, S. (2013). Crisis communications: The definitive guide to managing the message. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., and Seeger, M. W. (2017). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity (4th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Pew Center. (2019, March 26). For local news, Americans embrace digital but still want strong community connection. Downloaded March 30, 2019. https://www.journalism.org/2019/03/26/for-local-news-americans-embrace-digital-but-still-want-strong-community-connection/
Grinberg, David B. (2018, April 2). Media relations 101: Why transparency always triumphs. Downloaded April 28, 2019. https://medium.com/@DBGrinberg/media-relations-101-why-transparency-triumphs-2e9f720d2bfd

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Boston: Cengage.
Grunig & Hunt, p. 144.
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2010). PR strategy and application. Blackwell. Managing influence, p. 4. West Sussex, U.K: Wiley-
Pew Center. (2019, March 26). For local news, Americans embrace digital but still want strong community connection. Downloaded March 30, 2019. https://www.journalism.org/2019/03/26/for-local-news-americans-embrace-digital-but-still-want-strong-community-connection/
Grinberg, David B. (2018, April 2). Media relations 101: Why transparency always triumphs. Downloaded April 28, 2019. https://medium.com/@DBGrinberg/media-relations-101-why-transparency-triumphs-2e9f720d2bfd