Notes on Chapter 1 & Chapter 2: Police Deviance, Ethics, and Policing Paradox
Chapter 1: Overview of Police Deviance
Key terms and concepts
- Police deviance, police misconduct, malfeasance, and homicide
- Police profession vs. police occupation
- Dark side of policing: the morally dangerous aspects of policing due to structure, setting, and discretion
- Deviant behavior: Glaser (1971) defines deviance as any behavior or attribute deemed objectionable in a social system; this implies opportunities for legal/ethical deviance in any organization or occupation context
- If Glaser’s hypothesis is true, American policing provides myriad opportunities for deviant behavior (misconduct, malfeasance, homicide)
Profession vs. occupation in American policing
- Police work is sometimes called a profession that serves state-designated agencies; policing is the exercise of state power
- The occupation’s structure and environment spawn opportunities for deviance
- This tension is often described as policing’s dark side
Three complicating issues surrounding the dark side of American policing
- Issue 1: The debate over whether policing is a profession or an occupation; terms used interchangeably in describing duties
- Issue 2: Detention/corrections officers are often defined as peace officers and law enforcement officers by federal/state definitions; focus here is on local police with patrol, traffic, and investigation duties
- Issue 3: American policing is highly fragmented (about 18,000 local agencies) with overlapping jurisdictions; even agencies like TSA perform policing duties but are not a traditional law enforcement agency
- Despite differences, all levels face similar categories of deviance: misconduct, malfeasance, and homicide
Local police work: setting, discretion, and the dark side
- Local policing occurs in low-visibility settings with high discretionary decision making
- The work setting involves dealing with drug dealers, vice operators, marginalized individuals, and criminals
- This contributes to the moral danger of the occupation and opportunities for deviance; policing hasn’t always been deviance-prone, but the potential exists
Varied views of policing among practitioners and observers
- Some view policing as just a job
- Others see policing as a profession akin to law, medicine, and education
- Others view it as a calling to do good for others
- Supporters/critics debate whether police workers perform society’s “dirty work”; Bittner described police as “the fire that is used to fight fire”
Notable examples of police deviance and misconduct
- High-profile cases referenced as part of the dark side: George Floyd, Walter Scott, Rodney King, sexual assaults, robberies at crime scenes, and overtime fraud claims
- These examples illustrate how deviance fits into the broader discussion of policing’s dark side
Data sources and limitations
- The Henry A. Wallace Police Crime Database (Bowling Green State University) tracks arrests/offenses involving nonfederal American law enforcement officers (e.g., assault, driving offenses, drug offenses, fraud, homicide, larceny/theft, sex crimes, and other offenses)
- The transcript mentions data for 2005–2019; exact numbers are not clearly stated in the text provided
Education and professionalization trends in policing
- Early view: August Volmer (1905) argued that all American police officers should have a college degree and outlined a curriculum
- National trend: 1967 President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice suggested reforming education levels; 70% of departments required a high school diploma; proposed tiers (police officer vs. police agent) with escalating education requirements
- 1973 National Advisory on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals recommended at least one year of college; by 1982, four years of education for applicants
- Actual adoption: none of the recommendations fully adopted; many agencies prefer applicants with college credits or two-year degrees; some require degrees for promotions or chief positions
- National statistics (as of 2017 Fullerton report): ~
- ~
- ~
- State variations in higher education attainment among officers: Massachusetts, New Jersey, Minnesota, California lead in four-year degree attainment; master’s degrees among chiefs/sheriffs are notable
- Conclusion: Police misconduct is a major social issue linked to the dark side, and education is debated as a reform strategy; however, deviance has roots in occupational structure and culture
- Note: Education level alone does not fully determine deviant behavior; officers with college degrees also commit misconduct, malfeasance, and homicide
Chapter transition
- This chapter leads into Chapter 2: Policing Paradox
Chapter 2: Policing Paradox
Chapter objectives
- Understand the history and development of the police work occupation
- Compare codes of conduct for police agencies in the United Kingdom and the United States
- Identify rogue police officers and the dark side of policing
- Explore the national police crises in the United Kingdom and the United States
- Examine the American policing paradox
Key terms (overview)
- Sir Robert Peel
- Peel’s nine principles of policing
- Code of ethics
- International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)
- United Kingdom College of Policing
- Constitutional Policing
- Master Status
- National Police Crisis
- Rogue Police Officers
The beginning of the blue parade (Box 2.1)
- On Saturday, 09/26/1829, ~1,000 men formed six divisions and began the process of becoming the London Metropolitan Police Service
- They were sworn in by police commissioners, given uniforms, and reports on where to report for food and lodging
- By Monday, six divisions were established; by Tuesday, the force marched in formation to designated stations
- The Metropolitan Police Service was the first publicly paid police agency in the world
Foundations of the American police occupation/ profession
- The American model was adapted from the London Metropolitan Police
- Policing is the exercise of state power; the new system aimed to deter crime and disorder and to deter lower-class and marginalized populations
- Two deterrence objectives: deterrence of crime and incapacitation of offenders
- Noble cause corruption arises from officers framing or fabricating evidence to secure convictions for offenders who may be guilty
- The Londons’ reforms influenced American policing, but the lack of central control in the U.S. led to corruption and brutality in some cities
Peelian principles and the establishment of ethical policing
- The Gen
- The general instruction book from the Met included the Peelian principles, which set standards for ethical police behavior in democratic policing
- Key idea: consent of the governed, transparency, accountability, and minimal use of force
- The Nine Peelian principles (summarized and in detail below) lay the foundation for prevention-based policing and public legitimacy
The Nine Peelian principles of policing (as presented)
1) Prevent crime and disorder as an alternative to repression by force and harsh punishments
2) Police power depends on public approval; policing should serve the public and maintain trust
3) Public cooperation is essential for law observance; trustworthy police gain voluntary cooperation
4) Impartial service to the law, with fairness and without regard to the substance of the laws; cooperation reduces the need for force
5) Seek public favor not by pandering, but by impartial service, courtesy, and sacrifice; transparency and procedural justice
6) Respect the sanctity of life and the dignity of individuals; use force only when necessary and proportionately
7) Maintain a relationship with the public in which the police are the public and the public are the police; patrol is a duty of all citizens
8) Strict adherence to police executive functions and restraint from usurping judiciary power; avoid extrajudicial vengeance or personal punishment
9) Test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible police action; emphasizes preventive policingThe concept of a morally dangerous workplace
- The Met model introduced clear rules, but the environment remained morally dangerous, with temptations and opportunities for deviance
- The workplace offered conditions for deviance: criminal opportunities, weak oversight, and the presence of a blue-brotherhood culture
- Early evidence from the United Kingdom showed officers were dismissed for drunkenness, neglect, misconduct, and criminal acts, signaling the dark side of policing
- As the British model spread to America, urban policing in the U.S. saw similar patterns of corruption and police abuse, often tied to political influence
The development of American policing and its expansion (1840–1934/40s)
- Growth in American civic policing: 64 American cities formalized professional police agencies from 1840 to 1930
- Year-by-year snapshots (approximate): 1840 — 8 agencies; 1850 — 26; 1860 — 16; 1870 — 7; 1880 — 3; 1900–1934 — ~34 agencies
- Population and immigration context: 1814–1860 population roughly quadrupled to about 31 million; waves of Irish and German immigrants increased urban populations and crime concerns
- The expansion and franchising of police departments aligned with urban growth and the need for organized control of vice, crime, and public order
The code of ethics and its transatlantic influence
- The English and American policing traditions produced codes of ethics to standardize professional behavior
- The IACP code of ethics (1987) is a key American standard; it defines professional expectations for public law enforcement officers at local, state, and federal levels
- The UK adopted a College of Policing Code of Ethics (July 2014) with 10 standards of professional behavior, aligned with Peelian principles
The IACP code of ethics and constitutional policing (US focus)
- The IACP code emphasizes service, protection, and respect, rather than a narrow focus on crime control
- Constitutional policing centers on fairness, equal protection, and safeguarding civil liberties while enforcing laws
- The code targets official acts and professionalism rather than private morality; it does not explicitly enumerate arrests or investigations but emphasizes core duties and ethical behavior
Master status and the police officer identity
- A police officer is described as a master status that transcends other social roles; this identity shapes behavior on and off duty
- The idea that “one is a cop, all the time” can influence discretion and public perception; the “avenging angels” syndrome describes a tendency to see enforcement as a personal mission
Codes of ethics: UK vs. US
- UK: The College of Policing (2014) codifies standards of professional behavior; grounded in Peelian principles; aims to achieve a fully professional status through ethics codes
- US: The IACP code (1987) codifies ethics for public law enforcement officers and emphasizes constitutional policing
Violations of codes and corruption cases
- Historical patterns of corruption in the US include the Knapp Commission findings (late 1960s–1970s) on NYPD corruption
- Earlier NYPD scandals included Lexow (1894), Curran (1932), Seabury (1950), and Harry Gross investigations
- The Knapp Commission and subsequent reform exposed systemic corruption and the need for oversight and accountability
- In the UK, policing scandals raised concerns about integrity and reform, signaling that corruption can occur in centralized and decentralized systems
Whistleblowing and the code of silence
- The “code of silence” is a peer-norm that discourages reporting misconduct; however, whistleblowing exists and can be protected in some jurisdictions
- Examples cited include whistleblower actions within NYPD and other departments in pursuit of accountability
- The absence of a universal, immutable code of silence means cultural and organizational factors determine its strength
National police crises and public trust
- United States: Police violence and controversial killings (e.g., Ferguson 2014; Tyre Nichols case) sparked a national crisis and debates about policing, accountability, and reforms
- UK: High-profile incidents and investigations (e.g., 2011 IPCC concerns about deaths in custody, racism, misogyny) contributed to a metropolitan policing crisis
- Public trust data: 2022 Gallup poll reported that only 45% of respondents had a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in the police; 53% of White respondents vs. 34% of respondents from other races expressed confidence
- 2023/2022 trend data and task force commentaries emphasize that fair treatment of all citizens is essential for democratic policing; the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing highlighted trust as central to effective policing
- UK crisis specifics (2021–2022): Sarah Everard case and subsequent vetting failures revealed deeper issues of misogyny, racism, and misconduct; reports suggested that vetting failures allowed problematic officers to be hired and retained
- Current reform discussions include calls to break up large police structures or reprioritize funding to social services (housing, mental health, addiction services) as part of addressing systemic issues
Public trust, legitimacy, and democratic policing
- Across both countries, democratic policing hinges on transparency, accountability, and civilian oversight
- The existence of a “dark side” challenges the normative ideals of policing; reform efforts aim to align practice with the value of zero tolerance for abuse of power
Key conclusions and takeaways
- Police work is a morally dangerous occupation with persistent opportunities for deviance due to structure, culture, and discretion
- There is a longstanding debate about whether policing should be treated as a profession; the profession/occupation debate continues, with reforms focusing on education, ethics, accountability, and civilian oversight
- While most officers perform admirably, a measurable minority engage in misconduct, malfeasance, or homicide; robust data, oversight, whistleblower protections, and technology (e.g., body-worn cameras) have changed some dynamics, but do not eliminate the dark side
- The absence of a universal “dark side” is a societal expectation; yet, the combination of historical patterns and contemporary crises demonstrates the ongoing challenges of ensuring ethical policing
Key terms and concepts (glossary)
Sir Robert Peel: Founder of the London Metropolitan Police; advocated policing by consent, public service, and moral governance of policing
Peel’s nine principles of policing: The foundational ethical framework for public policing; summarized above under the Nine Peelian principles
Code of ethics: A formal guideline outlining acceptable and expected conduct for a police organization; used to establish a culture of integrity and reduce ambiguity in ethical decision-making
IACP (International Association of Chiefs of Police): American professional body that codified the IACP Code of Ethics (1987) for public law enforcement officers
United Kingdom College of Policing: Official body setting standards for policing practice, ethics, and professional behavior in England and Wales; bases standards on Peelian principles
Constitutional Policing: A policing philosophy centered on upholding constitutional rights and ensuring fair, due-process-based law enforcement
Master Status: A social status that dominates an individual’s identity across contexts (e.g., the police officer as a master status)
National Police Crisis: Broad term describing periods of crisis and reform in policing in both the United States and the United Kingdom, centered on ethics, trust, and accountability
Rogue Police Officers: Officers who engage in serious criminal or unethical conduct; part of the broader discussion of police deviance
Additional notes on ethics and practice
- The code of ethics defines accepted behavior for public policing and informs what constitutes deviance from an ethical perspective
- The Peelian framework emphasizes transparency, consent, proportionate force, and public accountability as the core bulwarks of legitimate policing
- The code of ethics in both countries illustrates how professional values are codified to guide behavior and establish norms that constrain deviance
Notable incidents and reforms (selected examples)
- United States: Knapp Commission (NYPD corruption) and earlier investigations (Lexow 1894, Curran 1932, Seabury 1950, Harry Gross) highlighted systemic corruption and the need for oversight
- United Kingdom: 2011 IPCC concerns about deaths and serious injuries in policing; 2021–2022 cases of misconduct, misogyny, and the Everard-related reforms; Vetting failures identified in 2021–2022 reviews
- The ongoing crisis context in both nations emphasizes the need for ethical standards, transparency, and accountability to maintain public trust and legitimacy
Final takeaway
- There should be no dark side in policing; reforms aim to minimize opportunities for deviance, increase transparency, and uphold democratic policing norms