Study Notes on Birthright Citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment

Introduction to the Fourteenth Amendment

  • The Fourteenth Amendment was established to protect the rights of formerly enslaved people.

  • Constitutional interpretation: the Constitution is referred to as a "living, breathing document," implying it must adapt with societal change.

  • The specific wording of the Fourteenth Amendment focuses on citizenship derived from birth: "all persons born or naturalized in the United States".

Definition of Birthright Citizenship

  • Birthright citizenship is conferred to all individuals born on U.S. soil, as specified in the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • The key term is "born," indicating citizenship is granted to anyone born within the borders of the U.S.

  • The question arises regarding exceptions that may contradict this principle.

Wong Kim Ark Case

  • The case of Wong Kim Ark (United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 1898) established precedence for birthright citizenship.

  • The ruling determined that children born to non-citizen parents on U.S. soil are entitled to citizenship if the parents do not hold official governmental positions in their home country.

  • The case's background emphasizes that both parents must be permanent residents without official positions to grant citizenship to their child born on U.S. soil.

Political vs. Geographic Jurisdiction

  • Political Jurisdiction: A person is subject to the laws of the U.S. and pledges allegiance to the U.S. by becoming a permanent resident or citizen.

  • Geographic Jurisdiction: Refers to the location where a person is born.

  • The argument against birthright citizenship centers on whether individuals of foreign diplomats or government officials are covered under this classification.

Allegiance and Loyalty

  • Questions concerning allegiance and loyalty arise particularly in discussions around children of foreign nationals.

  • Arguments against granting citizenship to children born to foreign diplomats stem from their allegiance to their home country.

  • The opposition's claim is that being born within the U.S. does not guarantee loyalty to the U.S., hence challenging the assumption of birthright citizenship.

Implications of Changing Birthright Citizenship Laws

  • If birthright citizenship were curtailed, all U.S. citizens could be affected negatively, not just individuals in specific circumstances.

  • The suggestion that children born to individuals governed by foreign powers should not receive citizenship implicates broader changes affecting many U.S. citizens.

Dual Citizenship Considerations

  • Dual citizenship differs from the topic at hand, as it involves legal processes to become recognized in multiple nations.

  • The discussion focuses primarily on those seeking sole citizenship in the U.S., particularly with the action of repealing birthright citizenship.

Trump's Executive Order and Immigration Policy

  • Executive orders targeting birthright citizenship raise significant constitutional questions regarding the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • The administration's agenda reflects an intent to reshape immigration policy potentially at the expense of long-established rights.

  • Birthright citizenship provisions in U.S. law are meant to ensure inclusion and equality for all individuals born on American soil.

Civil Rights Act of 1866

  • The Act states that all persons born in the U.S. are considered citizens unless subject to a foreign power.

  • It was pivotal for cementing the citizenship rights intended to extend protection to those formerly enslaved.

  • The language of this Act is crucial for interpreting restrictions around birthright citizenship.

Summary of Jurisdiction Terminology

  • Political Jurisdiction emphasizes allegiance and the legal status of individuals regarding their citizenship.

  • Geographic Jurisdiction simply refers to where a person is physically located.

  • Adoption of the phrase "subject to jurisdiction thereof" in the Fourteenth Amendment reinforces political allegiance, differentiating from mere physical presence in the U.S.

Conclusion

  • The argument stresses the need for the court to uphold birthright citizenship as per the historical context of the post-Civil War era's intentions.

  • Focus on consistent interpretations and historic precedents in U.S. citizenship law, particularly emphasizing the Wong Kim Ark decision as a benchmark for citizenship definitions.

  • Maintaining established norms protects constitutional guarantees against attempts to redefine citizenship restrictions unjustly.