Study Notes on Birthright Citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment
Introduction to the Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment was established to protect the rights of formerly enslaved people.
Constitutional interpretation: the Constitution is referred to as a "living, breathing document," implying it must adapt with societal change.
The specific wording of the Fourteenth Amendment focuses on citizenship derived from birth: "all persons born or naturalized in the United States".
Definition of Birthright Citizenship
Birthright citizenship is conferred to all individuals born on U.S. soil, as specified in the Fourteenth Amendment.
The key term is "born," indicating citizenship is granted to anyone born within the borders of the U.S.
The question arises regarding exceptions that may contradict this principle.
Wong Kim Ark Case
The case of Wong Kim Ark (United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 1898) established precedence for birthright citizenship.
The ruling determined that children born to non-citizen parents on U.S. soil are entitled to citizenship if the parents do not hold official governmental positions in their home country.
The case's background emphasizes that both parents must be permanent residents without official positions to grant citizenship to their child born on U.S. soil.
Political vs. Geographic Jurisdiction
Political Jurisdiction: A person is subject to the laws of the U.S. and pledges allegiance to the U.S. by becoming a permanent resident or citizen.
Geographic Jurisdiction: Refers to the location where a person is born.
The argument against birthright citizenship centers on whether individuals of foreign diplomats or government officials are covered under this classification.
Allegiance and Loyalty
Questions concerning allegiance and loyalty arise particularly in discussions around children of foreign nationals.
Arguments against granting citizenship to children born to foreign diplomats stem from their allegiance to their home country.
The opposition's claim is that being born within the U.S. does not guarantee loyalty to the U.S., hence challenging the assumption of birthright citizenship.
Implications of Changing Birthright Citizenship Laws
If birthright citizenship were curtailed, all U.S. citizens could be affected negatively, not just individuals in specific circumstances.
The suggestion that children born to individuals governed by foreign powers should not receive citizenship implicates broader changes affecting many U.S. citizens.
Dual Citizenship Considerations
Dual citizenship differs from the topic at hand, as it involves legal processes to become recognized in multiple nations.
The discussion focuses primarily on those seeking sole citizenship in the U.S., particularly with the action of repealing birthright citizenship.
Trump's Executive Order and Immigration Policy
Executive orders targeting birthright citizenship raise significant constitutional questions regarding the Fourteenth Amendment.
The administration's agenda reflects an intent to reshape immigration policy potentially at the expense of long-established rights.
Birthright citizenship provisions in U.S. law are meant to ensure inclusion and equality for all individuals born on American soil.
Civil Rights Act of 1866
The Act states that all persons born in the U.S. are considered citizens unless subject to a foreign power.
It was pivotal for cementing the citizenship rights intended to extend protection to those formerly enslaved.
The language of this Act is crucial for interpreting restrictions around birthright citizenship.
Summary of Jurisdiction Terminology
Political Jurisdiction emphasizes allegiance and the legal status of individuals regarding their citizenship.
Geographic Jurisdiction simply refers to where a person is physically located.
Adoption of the phrase "subject to jurisdiction thereof" in the Fourteenth Amendment reinforces political allegiance, differentiating from mere physical presence in the U.S.
Conclusion
The argument stresses the need for the court to uphold birthright citizenship as per the historical context of the post-Civil War era's intentions.
Focus on consistent interpretations and historic precedents in U.S. citizenship law, particularly emphasizing the Wong Kim Ark decision as a benchmark for citizenship definitions.
Maintaining established norms protects constitutional guarantees against attempts to redefine citizenship restrictions unjustly.