Adverse Selection
Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
What is Adverse Selection?
Definition: Adverse selection arises when there is hidden information before a transaction occurs.
Market Dynamics:
One side of the market possesses more information about their own “type” (riskiness, quality, health, etc.) than the other.
In insurance markets, adverse selection refers to individuals with higher risk being more likely to buy insurance compared to lower-risk individuals.
Consequences:
Can lead to a death spiral:
Death Spiral: A situation where rising premiums, due to the high-risk composition of insured individuals, drive low-risk customers out of the market, resulting in a higher average risk and subsequent premium hikes.
Definition & Mechanism of the Death Spiral
Death Spiral Definition: A death spiral occurs when increasing premiums drive lower-risk individuals out of the market, causing average risk (and premiums) to rise further.
Outcome of a Death Spiral:
This iterative process continues until only the highest-risk and most expensive participants remain.
Often results in market collapse or extremely high insurance costs.
How a Death Spiral Unfolds
Initial Premium Set:
Insurers set premiums based on the expected average risk of the overall pool.
Individuals with higher risk are more motivated to buy coverage.
High-Risk Composition Increases:
The insured pool contains a disproportionately large share of high-risk individuals.
Claims increase above what the original premium was designed to cover.
Premiums Rise:
Insurers raise premiums for everyone in the pool.
Low-risk individuals tend to drop coverage due to these increased costs.
Risk Pool Worsens Further:
More low-risk consumers leave the pool, causing the average risk to increase again.
Insurers face higher claim costs per remaining policyholder.
Repeating Cycle:
Insurers raise premiums again to compensate for the riskier pool.
Moderate-risk consumers may exit or choose less comprehensive plans.
This cycle continues until only the very highest-risk individuals are left.
Example: Health Insurance
Initial Situation:
Insurer expecting an average of $4,000 in claims per person sets a premium at approximately $4,500 (to cover overhead + profit).
Healthy individuals, with expected claims of $1,000, feel they are “overpaying” and may opt not to purchase insurance.
First Premium Hike:
With fewer healthy individuals, average claims rise (say to $5,000 per person).
Insurer increases premiums, potentially to $5,500.
Moderately healthy individuals (expected claims between $2,500 and $3,000) feel overcharged and may leave as well.
Classic Example: The Market for Lemons (Expanded)
Setup:
Two types of used cars for sale: Lemon (low quality) and Peach (high quality).
Sellers know which type they have, while buyers cannot directly observe the quality of the car.
Numbers in Our Example:
Assumption: 50% of cars are lemons, and 50% are peaches.
Value to buyers:
Lemon: $2,000
Peach: $6,000
Buyers initially assume cars are of average quality due to the lack of information.
Expected Value & First Price:
Expected maximum price buyers are willing to pay:
0.5 imes 2000 + 0.5 imes 6000 = 4000
Example 1: Used Smartphones
Setup:
Two types of used smartphones: Defective (low quality, e.g., battery issues) and Like-New (high quality, well maintained).
Sellers know the exact condition while buyers cannot easily tell by a brief listing.
Numbers in Our Example:
40% of the phones are defective; 60% are like-new.
Value to buyers is:
Defective: $100
Like-New: $300
Expected Value & First Price:
Initial buyer willingness to pay if 40% chance of defective and 60% chance of like-new:
0.4 imes 100 + 0.6 imes 300 = 220
Outcome: Owners of like-new phones may not sell at $220, leading to more defective phones remaining.
Example 2: Designer Handbags
Setup:
Two types of bags: Counterfeits (low-quality fakes) and Authentic (high-quality originals).
Sellers know their item's condition; buyers may not always tell authenticity from images.
Numbers in Our Example:
30% of listings are counterfeits and 70% are authentic.
Value to buyers:
Counterfeit: $50
Authentic: $400
Consequences:
Owners of genuine bags may find $295 too low for their $400 item and exit the market, increasing the fraction of fakes.
This contributes to reinforcing the lemons problem even further.
Example 3: Private Tutoring Services
Setup:
Two types of tutors: Skilled and Experienced vs. Inexperienced and Unqualified.
Tutors know their qualifications; students cannot directly observe skill.
Numbers in Our Example:
50% of tutors are highly skilled; 50% are inexperienced.
Skilled tutor value: $50/hour; Inexperienced: $10/hour.
Outcome:
Skilled tutors may refuse to work for $30/hour, prompting high-quality tutors to leave the market, thus decreasing average quality.
Resulting behavior diminishes the potential pay for students as market dynamics shift downward.
Adverse Selection in Insurance
Health Insurance:
Individuals aware of their poor health are more likely to purchase generous insurance coverage.
Result: Insurers must raise premiums to cover high expected costs, driving healthier people away.
Auto Insurance:
Risky drivers tend to seek comprehensive coverage; safe drivers may only opt for minimal coverage if premiums escalate.
Potential outcome could lead to overpriced insurance or market unraveling, where only the highest-risk individuals remain insured.
Strategies to Mitigate Adverse Selection
Screening:
Definition: The less informed party gathers information actively.
Examples:
Auto insurance companies check driving history.
Health insurers require medical exams.
Employers conduct background checks.
Purpose: Helps reduce unknowns by allowing insurers to set premiums based on actual risk and deter high-risk types from entering the market.
Signaling:
Definition: The informed party reveals private information through observable actions.
Examples:
Job applicants obtaining degrees to signal competence.
Safe drivers sharing telematics data.
Characteristics of a Credible Signal:
Costly for low-quality types to imitate.
Observable by the other party to establish trust.
Mandates / Pooling:
Mandates: Policies requiring everyone to purchase insurance (e.g., individual mandates in health insurance).
Pooling: Regulated community rating or risk pooling mixes high and low-risk individuals, stabilizing costs across the population.
Rationale: Prevents market collapse, promotes equity, stabilizes costs for high-risk individuals.
What is Moral Hazard?
Definition: Moral hazard occurs when there is hidden action following a transaction, leading individuals to change behavior in ways that cannot be observed by the other party.
Examples:
After securing full auto coverage, a driver may adopt riskier driving behaviors.
A homeowner may neglect security once their home is insured.
Examples of Moral Hazard
Auto Insurance Scenario:
A fully insured driver may drive faster or park in riskier places.
The insurer cannot monitor every decision made by the driver, leading to increased accident probabilities.
Employment Contract Scenario:
Employees may reduce effort levels after being hired under fixed compensation, knowing their work cannot be perfectly observed by the employer.
Banking Scenario:
Large banks may engage in riskier investments if they believe they’ll be bailed out by the government, reducing their incentive to avoid risk.
All-You-Can-Eat Buffet Scenario:
A diner may overindulge at a buffet since the cost of additional food is effectively zero, leading to waste and excessive consumption.
Reducing Moral Hazard in Insurance
Deductibles and Copayments:
Definition: A deductible is the fixed amount paid by the insured before coverage kicks in. A copayment is a small charge for each service.
Incentive: These mechanisms ensure shared costs, discouraging frivolous claims and excessive service use.
Coinsurance:
Definition: The insured pays a percentage of each claim, similar to copay but expressed as a fraction of total costs.
Incentive Effect: Encourages careful decision-making regarding claims as individuals face a portion of financial responsibility.
Monitoring / Telematics:
Definition: Insurers collect data on insured party behaviors post-policy issuance.
Trade-Off: Helps reduce hidden actions, but raises privacy concerns among policyholders.
No-Claims Bonus:
Definition: Discounts for maintaining a claim-free status over periods.
Incentive Effect: Encourages careful behavior to avoid claims and maintain lower premiums.
Experience Rating:
Definition: Premiums adjusted based on the insured's claims history.
Behavioral Change: Awareness that claims drive premium increases encourages ongoing caution.
Coverage Limits & Exclusions:
Definition: Certain high-risk items may be capped or excluded in coverage.
Rationale: Prevents the potential for financial loss from high-risk claims and limits moral hazard incentives.