Study Notes on Gender, Media, and State Power: The Istanbul Convention and Turkey's Withdrawal Process
Gender, Media, and State Power: The Istanbul Convention and Turkey’s Withdrawal Process
What is the Istanbul Convention?
- Opened for signature in 2011 in Istanbul.
- Aims to prevent violence against women and domestic violence.
- Defines gender-based violence as a structural problem.
Core Principles of the Convention
- Prevention: Strategies and measures aimed at avoiding violence before it occurs.
- Protection: Measures to protect victims and ensure their safety and support.
- Prosecution: Legal frameworks to hold perpetrators accountable for acts of violence.
- Integrated Policies: Connecting various governmental policies to effectively combat violence against women.
Definition of Gender
- Convention Definition: Gender refers to socially constructed roles, behaviours, and attributes associated with women and men.
- Contested Interpretation:
- Seen as denying biological sex.
- Framed as imposing “gender ideology.”
Non-Discrimination
- Convention Stipulation: Protection must be ensured without discrimination on the grounds of:
- Sex: Biological attributes of women and men.
- Gender: Social roles and relations.
- Sexual Orientation: The emotional and sexual attraction one feels towards others.
- Gender Identity: A person's internal understanding of their gender, which may differ from their biological sex.
- Contested Aspects:
- Claimed to “legitimize” LGBTQ+ identities.
- Viewed as a threat to the traditional family structure.
Article 12 – Culture, Custom, Religion
- Convention Statement: Culture, tradition, religion, or so-called “honour” cannot justify violence.
- Debated Viewpoints:
- Seen as interference with traditions and religious values.
- Considered state intervention into family life.
The “Family” Debate
- Convention Clarifications:
- No redefinition of marriage.
- No abolition of the family unit.
- No obligations concerning sexual orientation or gender identity.
- Mischaracterizations:
- Framed as “destroying the family.”
- Presented as “undermining moral values.”
Turkey’s Withdrawal Process
- Turkey was the first country to sign and ratify the Istanbul Convention.
- Withdrew from the Convention in 2021 by Presidential decree.
- Notably, no parliamentary debate was held during this withdrawal process.
Official Justifications for Withdrawal
- Claims focused on protection of the family.
- Accusations of 'gender ideology' underlying the Convention's goals.
- Adoption of an anti-LGBTQ+ discourse to support withdrawal.
Media and Discourse Surrounding the Istanbul Convention
- The Convention was framed as a cultural threat rather than a legal framework aimed at protection.
- Emphasis placed on morality, family, and national values as integral to societal identity.
Anti-Convention Media Headlines
- Examples:
- “The Istanbul Convention Threatens the Family”
- “Say No to Gender Ideology”
- “A Western Immorality Project”
Discursive Strategies Used in Media
- Moral Panic: Creating an exaggerated sense of threat regarding the Convention.
- Othering: Defining certain groups as outsiders.
- Us vs. Them Narratives: Polarizing views that promote division.
- Invisibilization of Violence: Marginalizing discussions around actual violence against women.
Alternative / Counter Headlines
- Examples advocating for the Convention include:
- “The Istanbul Convention Saves Lives”
- “Women’s Right to Life Is Non-Negotiable”
- “Violence Is a Human Rights Issue”
Anti-Gender Politics Context
- Defined as a global political movement opposing gender equality policies.
- Focuses on central values of family, religion, and nation as necessary to societal structure.
Comparative Perspective on Turkey, Poland, and Hungary regarding the Istanbul Convention
Turkey:
- Status: Withdrew from the Convention in 2021.
- Dominant Discourse: Protection of the family, accompanied by anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric.
- Political Actor: Executive power led withdrawal.
Poland:
- Status: Engaged in debates over withdrawal and facing legal restrictions.
- Dominant Discourse: Emphasis on Catholic values and anti-abortion rhetoric.
- Political Actor: Right-wing conservative government.
Hungary:
- Status: Has never ratified the Convention.
- Dominant Discourse: Ongoing “gender ideology” narrative.
- Political Actor: Orbán government with authoritarian populist governance.
Shared Patterns Across Countries
- Anti-Gender Ideology Discourse: Consistent framing across different nations.
- Targeting of Feminist Movements: Efforts to undermine the progress and voices of feminist advocates.
- Distance from International Human Rights Norms: Moving away from global commitments to gender equality and human rights protections.
Theoretical Framework
- Gramsci: Cultural Hegemony: The concept that the state governs through both coercion and consent, creating cultural narratives that support its governance.
- Stanley Cohen: Moral Panic: The phenomenon where societies exaggerate perceived threats, creating folk devils out of marginalized groups.
- Judith Butler: Gender as a Site of Power: The argument that gender is a political battleground upon which struggles over identity, control, and power play out.
Gramsci – Hegemony and Consent
- Core Idea: The state utilizes cultural narratives to maintain power beyond mere coercion.
- Application: Opposition to the Istanbul Convention relates to cultural hegemony over family, morality, and national identity, with feminist rights labeled as foreign or elitist.
Moral Panic (Stanley Cohen)
- Concept: Threats are exaggerated through media and cultural narratives, resulting in specific groups being demonized.
- Folks Devils Example: LGBTQ+ individuals and feminists are targeted as examples of societal decay.
- Key Elements of Moral Panic: Includes media exaggeration, simplification, distortion, and discussions around moral decline.
Judith Butler – Gender as a Political Battleground
- Main Argument: Gender identity and expressions are critical to understanding power and political struggles.
- Opposition to the Convention: Viewed as a struggle for control over bodies, sexuality, and the organization of family units.
Discussion Question
- Is withdrawing from the Istanbul Convention a legal decision or merely a symbolic act of power?