Study Notes on Gender, Media, and State Power: The Istanbul Convention and Turkey's Withdrawal Process

Gender, Media, and State Power: The Istanbul Convention and Turkey’s Withdrawal Process

What is the Istanbul Convention?

  • Opened for signature in 2011 in Istanbul.
  • Aims to prevent violence against women and domestic violence.
  • Defines gender-based violence as a structural problem.

Core Principles of the Convention

  • Prevention: Strategies and measures aimed at avoiding violence before it occurs.
  • Protection: Measures to protect victims and ensure their safety and support.
  • Prosecution: Legal frameworks to hold perpetrators accountable for acts of violence.
  • Integrated Policies: Connecting various governmental policies to effectively combat violence against women.

Definition of Gender

  • Convention Definition: Gender refers to socially constructed roles, behaviours, and attributes associated with women and men.
  • Contested Interpretation:
    • Seen as denying biological sex.
    • Framed as imposing “gender ideology.”

Non-Discrimination

  • Convention Stipulation: Protection must be ensured without discrimination on the grounds of:
    • Sex: Biological attributes of women and men.
    • Gender: Social roles and relations.
    • Sexual Orientation: The emotional and sexual attraction one feels towards others.
    • Gender Identity: A person's internal understanding of their gender, which may differ from their biological sex.
  • Contested Aspects:
    • Claimed to “legitimize” LGBTQ+ identities.
    • Viewed as a threat to the traditional family structure.

Article 12 – Culture, Custom, Religion

  • Convention Statement: Culture, tradition, religion, or so-called “honour” cannot justify violence.
  • Debated Viewpoints:
    • Seen as interference with traditions and religious values.
    • Considered state intervention into family life.

The “Family” Debate

  • Convention Clarifications:
    • No redefinition of marriage.
    • No abolition of the family unit.
    • No obligations concerning sexual orientation or gender identity.
  • Mischaracterizations:
    • Framed as “destroying the family.”
    • Presented as “undermining moral values.”

Turkey’s Withdrawal Process

  • Turkey was the first country to sign and ratify the Istanbul Convention.
  • Withdrew from the Convention in 2021 by Presidential decree.
  • Notably, no parliamentary debate was held during this withdrawal process.

Official Justifications for Withdrawal

  • Claims focused on protection of the family.
  • Accusations of 'gender ideology' underlying the Convention's goals.
  • Adoption of an anti-LGBTQ+ discourse to support withdrawal.

Media and Discourse Surrounding the Istanbul Convention

  • The Convention was framed as a cultural threat rather than a legal framework aimed at protection.
  • Emphasis placed on morality, family, and national values as integral to societal identity.
Anti-Convention Media Headlines
  • Examples:
    • “The Istanbul Convention Threatens the Family”
    • “Say No to Gender Ideology”
    • “A Western Immorality Project”
Discursive Strategies Used in Media
  • Moral Panic: Creating an exaggerated sense of threat regarding the Convention.
  • Othering: Defining certain groups as outsiders.
  • Us vs. Them Narratives: Polarizing views that promote division.
  • Invisibilization of Violence: Marginalizing discussions around actual violence against women.

Alternative / Counter Headlines

  • Examples advocating for the Convention include:
    • “The Istanbul Convention Saves Lives”
    • “Women’s Right to Life Is Non-Negotiable”
    • “Violence Is a Human Rights Issue”

Anti-Gender Politics Context

  • Defined as a global political movement opposing gender equality policies.
  • Focuses on central values of family, religion, and nation as necessary to societal structure.

Comparative Perspective on Turkey, Poland, and Hungary regarding the Istanbul Convention

  • Turkey:

    • Status: Withdrew from the Convention in 2021.
    • Dominant Discourse: Protection of the family, accompanied by anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric.
    • Political Actor: Executive power led withdrawal.
  • Poland:

    • Status: Engaged in debates over withdrawal and facing legal restrictions.
    • Dominant Discourse: Emphasis on Catholic values and anti-abortion rhetoric.
    • Political Actor: Right-wing conservative government.
  • Hungary:

    • Status: Has never ratified the Convention.
    • Dominant Discourse: Ongoing “gender ideology” narrative.
    • Political Actor: Orbán government with authoritarian populist governance.

Shared Patterns Across Countries

  • Anti-Gender Ideology Discourse: Consistent framing across different nations.
  • Targeting of Feminist Movements: Efforts to undermine the progress and voices of feminist advocates.
  • Distance from International Human Rights Norms: Moving away from global commitments to gender equality and human rights protections.

Theoretical Framework

  • Gramsci: Cultural Hegemony: The concept that the state governs through both coercion and consent, creating cultural narratives that support its governance.
  • Stanley Cohen: Moral Panic: The phenomenon where societies exaggerate perceived threats, creating folk devils out of marginalized groups.
  • Judith Butler: Gender as a Site of Power: The argument that gender is a political battleground upon which struggles over identity, control, and power play out.
Gramsci – Hegemony and Consent
  • Core Idea: The state utilizes cultural narratives to maintain power beyond mere coercion.
  • Application: Opposition to the Istanbul Convention relates to cultural hegemony over family, morality, and national identity, with feminist rights labeled as foreign or elitist.
Moral Panic (Stanley Cohen)
  • Concept: Threats are exaggerated through media and cultural narratives, resulting in specific groups being demonized.
  • Folks Devils Example: LGBTQ+ individuals and feminists are targeted as examples of societal decay.
  • Key Elements of Moral Panic: Includes media exaggeration, simplification, distortion, and discussions around moral decline.
Judith Butler – Gender as a Political Battleground
  • Main Argument: Gender identity and expressions are critical to understanding power and political struggles.
  • Opposition to the Convention: Viewed as a struggle for control over bodies, sexuality, and the organization of family units.

Discussion Question

  • Is withdrawing from the Istanbul Convention a legal decision or merely a symbolic act of power?