Social Psyc
Morality (1)
• Moral judgment refers to judgments about what we consider to be universally right or wrong about human action and character and what is worthy of punishment or reward.
o Moral psychology is a young branch of social psychology that focuses on how people actually make moral judgments, which is often guided by feeling.
Morality (2)
• Social Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment o the idea that people first have fast, emotional reactions to morally relevant events that in turn influence their
process of reasoning toward a judgment of right or wrong
Moral Intuition and Reason in the Brain
• Scientists have begun to map how specific feelings are associated with moral judgment in the brain using fMRI. o “Trolley dilemma”
§ Participants imagine a runaway trolley headed for five people who will be killed and the only way to save them is to hit a switch that will turn the trolley onto another set of tracks and kill one person.
§ Is it appropriate to hit the switch?
Moral Foundations Theory
• Moral foundations theory o a theory proposing that there are five evolved, universal
moral domains in which specific emotions guide moral judgments § care/harm
§ fairness/reciprocity
§ ingroup loyalty
§ authority/respect
§ purity/sanctity
Moral Foundations and Political Divisions
Altruism
• Altruism
o prosocial behavior that benefits others without regard to
consequences for oneself
Empathic Concern: A Case of Pure Altruism? (1)
• Social reward o a benefit, such as praise, positive attention, something tangible, or gratitude, that may be gained from helping others, thus serving as a motive for altruistic behavior
• Personal distress o a motive for helping others in distress that may arise from a
need to reduce one’s own distress
Empathic Concern: A Case of Pure Altruism? (2)
• Empathic concern
o identifying with someone in need, including feeling and
understanding what that person is experiencing, accompanied by the intention to help the person
Empathy Versus Personal Distress
• How can researchers document the fact that altruistic action can be motivated by empathic concern alone, independent of the desire for social rewards or to reduce personal distress?
Evaluation (x-axis |
| Hours participantwould spend withJanet (yaxis) |
Low social evaluation | Low empathy | 1.3 |
High social evaluation | High empathy | 2.4 |
Low social evaluation | Low empathy | 0.7 |
High social evaluation | High empathy | 1.7 |
Empathy and Altruism
Empathic Concern and Volunteerism
• Research shows that feelings of empathic concern and sympathy increase the likelihood that people will act altruistically, helping those who suffer.
• These feelings are also a primary determinant of other prosocial behaviors, such as volunteerism:
o assistance a person regularly provides to another person or
group with no expectation of compensation
Situational Determinants of Altruism: Kitty Genovese (1)
• In 1964, Kitty Genovese was murdered in front of her apartment building. o As she was being attacked, she screamed for help and
several of her neighbors witnessed the crime. o However, no one intervened to help her or even called the police. o Why did people fail to help in such an obvious emergency?
Situational Determinants of Altruism: Kitty Genovese (2)
• Kitty Genovese’s murder moved several social psychologists to attempt to understand the processes that dampen our empathic concern, inhibit altruistic action, and make people reluctant to intervene during emergencies.
The Presence of Other People (1)
• Bystander intervention o Giving assistance to someone in need on the part of those who have witnessed an emergency; bystander intervention usually decreases as the number of observers increases because each person feels someone else will probably help.
The Presence of Other People (2)
• Diffusion of responsibility o a reduction of the sense of urgency to help someone involved in an emergency or dangerous situation, based on the assumption that others who are present will help
o When participants believed that someone was having a seizure, 85 percent helped if they were the only other person present; only 62 percent helped if another person was present; and if multiple people were present, only 31 percent helped.
Victim Characteristics • Some people are more likely to receive help than others.
o Bystanders help victims who scream and make their needs known 75–100 percent of the time, but they help silent victims only 20–40 percent of the time.
Construal Processes and Altruism
• Given the ambiguity of many emergencies, the decision to offer help means that the potential helper first has to believe assistance is actually needed, based on clues from the victim’s behavior.
Helping in Ambiguous Situations (1)
• Pluralistic ignorance o occurs when people are unsure about what is happening and assume that nothing is wrong because no one else is
responding or appears concerned
Helping in Ambiguous Situations (2)
• Pluralistic ignorance results from informational social influence. o In ambiguous situations, we look to others to decide how we should act. o When left in a room that began to fill with smoke, 75 percent of participants left to alert an authority, but if other people were present, only 38 percent left to tell someone.
Combating Pluralistic Ignorance (1)
• Bystanders are less likely to fall prey to pluralistic ignorance when they can clearly see one another’s initial expressions of concern.
Combating Pluralistic Ignorance (2)
• How do you improve the chances of getting help when you need it?
o Make your need clear—“I’ve twisted my ankle and I can’t walk; I need help.” o Select a specific person—“You there, can you help me?”
Culture and Altruism
• Altruism in urban and rural settings o People are more likely to receive help in a rural area than an urban area.
Altruism in Rural and Urban Environments |
Parameters for Comparison (x-axis) |
| Percentage of participants who respond (y-axis) |
Correct overpayment | Urban | 53 |
Correct overpayment | Rural | 72 |
Help injured pedestrian | Urban | 18 |
Help injured pedestrian | Rural | 44 |
Help lost child | Urban | 57 |
Help lost child | Rural | 78 |
Tell your name | Urban | 33 |
Tell your name | Rural | 51 |
Give donation | Urban | 9 |
Give donation | Rural | 40 |
Social Class and Altruism
• Social class o How does social class influence levels of altruism?
§ When it comes to altruism, it turns out that those who have less give more, at least in terms of the proportion of their income they donate to charity.
Wealth and Charity
• Nicki Minaj has an extensive engagement with her philanthropy and has helped pay students’ debts and given money to a village in India.
Religion, Ethics, and Altruism
• The world’s major religions emphasize compassion, altruism, and treating others—even strangers and adversaries—with kindness.
The Golden Rule Across Cultures and Religions
Religion and Altruism
• As this study showed, being primed with religious concepts leads to greater generosity.
Being Watched
Prosocial Behavior and the Sense of Being Watched
• Swayambhunath Temple
o The eyes painted at the top of the dome give visitors the feeling they’re being watched.
Evolution and Altruism
• Evolutionarily, we should behave altruistically toward those who promote the survival and reproduction of ourselves and our genetic relatives.
Kin Selection
• Kin selection o an evolutionary strategy that favors the reproductive
success of one’s genetic relatives, even at a cost to one’s own survival and reproduction
§ Although individuals die, genes can be passed on forever as long as genetic relatives can reproduce.
§ We are evolutionarily inclined to help people more if they are more genetically related to ourselves.
Reciprocity
• How would an evolutionary account make sense of helping non-kin?
Cooperation
• Cooperation is essential to human functioning; however, individuals must balance the desire to cooperate with the desire not to be taken advantage of. o The inclination to cooperate for common goals is almost a defining attribute of humans.
Reciprocity and Cooperation
• Reciprocal altruism o helping others with the expectation that they will probably
return the favor in the future
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
• A situation involving payoffs to two people, who must decide whether to cooperate or defect; in the end, trust and cooperation lead to higher joint payoffs than do mistrust and defection. o Consider the classic story of two prisoners who have to choose between sticking to their story or betraying their partner, without knowing what their partner will do.
o If they both cooperate, both win. If they both defect, both lose. But if one defects when the other cooperates, one wins big and the other loses big.
The Payoff Matrix for the Prisoner’s Dilemma
Situational Determinants of Cooperation
• People’s construals about others with whom they’re interacting are an important determinant of whether people will cooperate.
Reputation
• Reputation
o the collective beliefs, evaluations, and impressions people
hold about an individual within a social network
o Gossiping is a communicative act in which one person comments on the reputation of another who is not present.
Construal Processes and Cooperation
• Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games o People who are more competitive are more likely to assume that others are competitive.
o People become more competitive after being primed with
words related to hostility.
o There was greater competition when the prisoner’s dilemma was played in a business context (for example, Wall Street) than when played as a community game.
Is Cooperation Contagious?
•
The popular movie Pay It Forward focuses on the theme of how one person’s generosity leads to other acts of generosity.
Culture and Cooperation (1)
• Cultural beliefs can influence rates of cooperation.
o Given how labels—and therefore construals—shape levels of cooperation, you might expect cultural factors to have a similar influence on the inclination to either cooperate or defect.
Culture and Cooperation (2)
• The ultimatum game
o situation where one participant is given a sum of money (or
other resource) to allocate between himself and another person
o can choose to allocate the resource in any way
§ can keep it all or divide it evenly o The ultimatum game is commonly used in psychology experiments to test cooperative and altruistic behavior.
Culture and Cooperation (3)
• Cooperation around the world o People who live in cultures requiring high amounts of
interdependence for survival (for example, food sharing) allocated resources more fairly during an ultimatum game than did people from other cultures.
Evolution and Cooperation: Tit for Tat (1)
• Tit-for-tat strategy o A strategy in the prisoner’s dilemma game in which the
player’s first move is cooperative; thereafter, the player mimics the other person’s behavior, whether cooperative or competitive. This strategy is known to encourage cooperation.
Evolution and Cooperation: Tit for Tat (2)
• Tit-for-tat strategy’s five factors o It is cooperative and thus encourages mutually supportive
action toward a shared goal. o It is not envious; a partner using this strategy can do
extremely well without resorting to competitive behavior.
o It is not exploitable, meaning it’s not blindly prosocial; if you defect on the tit for tat, it will defect on you. o It is forgiving; that is, it is willing to cooperate at the first cooperative action of the partner, even after long runs of defection and competition. o It is easy to read; it shouldn’t take long for others to know that the tit-for-tat strategy is being played.