Oxidation Reactions – Detailed Study Notes Definition & General Principles of Oxidation Traditional definition
• Addition of an electronegative element (usually O) to, or removal of an electropositive element (usually H) from, an organic substrate.
• Oxidation Level ↑ ⟺ O content ↑ or H content ↓ \text{Oxidation Level} \uparrow \Longleftrightarrow \text{O content} \uparrow \text{ or } \text{H content} \downarrow Oxidation Level ↑⟺ O content ↑ or H content ↓ Modern organic-chemistry view
• Any transformation that increases the proportion of an element more electronegative than C (O, Cl, Br, N, etc.).
• Example: step-wise chlorination of toluene Ar–CH < e m > 3 → Cl < / e m > 2 Ar–CH < e m > 2 Cl → Cl < / e m > 2 Ar–CHCl < e m > 2 → Cl < / e m > 2 Ar–CCl 3 \text{Ar–CH}<em>3 \;\xrightarrow[]{\text{Cl}</em>2} \;\text{Ar–CH}<em>2\text{Cl} \;\xrightarrow[]{\text{Cl}</em>2} \;\text{Ar–CHCl}<em>2 \;\xrightarrow[]{\text{Cl}</em>2} \;\text{Ar–CCl}_3 Ar–CH < e m > 3 Cl < / e m > 2 Ar–CH < e m > 2 Cl Cl < / e m > 2 Ar–CHCl < e m > 2 Cl < / e m > 2 Ar–CCl 3 Redox reciprocity
• When the organic compound is oxidised, the oxidant is reduced and vice-versa. Oxidation of Alkanes General inertness toward ordinary oxidants (KMnO₄, K₂Cr₂O₇), except when a tertiary C–H is present.
• (CH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 3 CH → 523 K , 10 3 atm Cu (CH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 3 COH \text{(CH}<em>3)</em>3\text{CH} \xrightarrow[523\,\text{K},\,10^3\,\text{atm}]{\text{Cu}} \text{(CH}<em>3)</em>3\text{COH} (CH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 3 CH Cu 523 K , 1 0 3 atm (CH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 3 COH (tert-butyl alcohol) Selected catalytic/partial oxidations of methane & ethane
• 2 CH < e m > 4 + O < / e m > 2 → 9 : 1 Mo < e m > 2 O < / e m > 3 2 CH < e m > 3 OH 2\,\text{CH}<em>4 + \text{O}</em>2 \;\xrightarrow[9:1]{\text{Mo}<em>2\text{O}</em>3} \; 2\,\text{CH}<em>3\text{OH} 2 CH < e m > 4 + O < / e m > 2 Mo < e m > 2 O < / e m > 3 9 : 1 2 CH < e m > 3 OH
• CH < / e m > 4 + 1 2 O < e m > 2 → Mo < / e m > 2 O < e m > 3 HCHO + H < / e m > 2 O \text{CH}</em>4 + \tfrac12\,\text{O}<em>2 \;\xrightarrow[]{\text{Mo}</em>2\text{O}<em>3} \; \text{HCHO}+\text{H}</em>2\text{O} CH < / e m > 4 + 2 1 O < e m > 2 Mo < / e m > 2 O < e m > 3 HCHO + H < / e m > 2 O
• 2 C < e m > 2 H < / e m > 6 + 3 O < e m > 2 → Δ ( CH < / e m > 3 COO ) < e m > 2 Mn 2 CH < / e m > 3 COOH + 2 H < e m > 2 O 2\,\text{C}<em>2\text{H}</em>6 + 3\,\text{O}<em>2 \;\xrightarrow[\Delta]{(\text{CH}</em>3\text{COO})<em>2\text{Mn}} \; 2\,\text{CH}</em>3\text{COOH}+2\,\text{H}<em>2\text{O} 2 C < e m > 2 H < / e m > 6 + 3 O < e m > 2 ( CH < / e m > 3 COO ) < e m > 2 Mn Δ 2 CH < / e m > 3 COOH + 2 H < e m > 2 O
• CH < / e m > 4 + limited O < e m > 2 → burn Δ C ( black ) + 2 H < / e m > 2 O \text{CH}</em>4+\text{limited }\text{O}<em>2 \xrightarrow[\text{burn}]{\Delta} \text{C} (\text{black})+2\,\text{H}</em>2\text{O} CH < / e m > 4 + limited O < e m > 2 Δ burn C ( black ) + 2 H < / e m > 2 O Oxidation of Alkenes & Alkynes Baeyer reagent (cold, dilute, alkaline KMnO < e m > 4 \text{KMnO}<em>4 KMnO < e m > 4 )
• Converts C = C C=C C = C to a cis-vicinal diol (syn addition).
• Mechanistic stereochemistry: both \ce{–OH} enter from the same face.
• Generic: >C=C< \;\xrightarrow[\text{OH}^-]{\text{KMnO}4} \; >C(OH)–C(OH)<
• Cyclohexene ⇒ cis-1,2-cyclohexanediol. OsO < e m > 4 / NaHSO < / e m > 3 \text{OsO}<em>4/\text{NaHSO}</em>3 OsO < e m > 4/ NaHSO < / e m > 3
• Same outcome (cis-diol) but milder, higher chemoselectivity; catalytic OsO < e m > 4 \text{OsO}<em>4 OsO < e m > 4 with H < / e m > 2 O 2 \text{H}</em>2\text{O}_2 H < / e m > 2 O 2 as stoichiometric re-oxidant.Peroxyacids (mCPBA, peroxyacetic, peroxyformic)
• Stage 1: epoxidation (concerted, stereospecific retention of geometry).
>C=C< + \text{RCO}3\text{H} \;\longrightarrow\; \text{epoxide}+\text{RCO} 2\text{H}
• Stage 2 (acidic hydrolysis): anti-diol (trans when starting alkene is cis, meso when starting alkene is trans). Oxidative cleavage with acidic/warm KMnO < e m > 4 \text{KMnO}<em>4 KMnO < e m > 4 (or O < / e m > 3 \text{O}</em>3 O < / e m > 3 fmt not included)
• Terminal = ! C H < e m > 2 =!CH<em>2 = ! C H < e m > 2 → CO < / e m > 2 \text{CO}</em>2 CO < / e m > 2 .
• = ! C H R =!CHR = ! C H R → RCOOH \text{RCOOH} RCOOH + CO < e m > 2 \text{CO}<em>2 CO < e m > 2 .
• = ! C R < / e m > 1 R < e m > 2 =!CR</em>1R<em>2 = ! CR < / e m > 1 R < e m > 2 → R < / e m > 1 C=O + R < e m > 2 C=O \text{R}</em>1\text{C=O}+\text{R}<em>2\text{C=O} R < / e m > 1 C=O + R < e m > 2 C=O (further oxidation of aldehydic fragments → acids).
• Examples
– RCH=CH < / e m > 2 → warm KMnO < e m > 4 / H + RCOOH + CO < / e m > 2 + H < e m > 2 O \text{RCH=CH}</em>2 \xrightarrow[\text{warm}]{\text{KMnO}<em>4/H^+} \text{RCOOH}+\text{CO}</em>2+\text{H}<em>2\text{O} RCH=CH < / e m > 2 KMnO < e m > 4/ H + warm RCOOH + CO < / e m > 2 + H < e m > 2 O
– RC≡CH → KMnO < / e m > 4 / H + RCOOH + CO < e m > 2 + H < / e m > 2 O \text{RC≡CH} \xrightarrow[]{\text{KMnO}</em>4/H^+} \text{RCOOH}+\text{CO}<em>2+\text{H}</em>2\text{O} RC≡CH KMnO < / e m > 4/ H + RCOOH + CO < e m > 2 + H < / e m > 2 O
– Internal alkyne RC≡CR \text{RC≡CR} RC≡CR → two carboxylic acids.
• Illustrative cleavages
– CH < e m > 3 – C ≡ C – C H < / e m > 2 C H < e m > 3 → 1 KMnO < / e m > 4 , OH − → 2 H + CH < e m > 3 COOH + CH < / e m > 3 CH < e m > 2 COOH \text{CH}<em>3–C≡C–CH</em>2CH<em>3 \xrightarrow[1]{\text{KMnO}</em>4,\text{OH}^-}\xrightarrow[2]{H^+} \text{CH}<em>3\text{COOH}+\text{CH}</em>3\text{CH}<em>2\text{COOH} CH < e m > 3– C ≡ C – C H < / e m > 2 C H < e m > 3 KMnO < / e m > 4 , OH − 1 H + 2 CH < e m > 3 COOH + CH < / e m > 3 CH < e m > 2 COOH
– CH < / e m > 3 C H < e m > 2 C H < / e m > 2 – C ≡ C H → CH < e m > 3 C H < / e m > 2 C H < e m > 2 COOH + CO < / e m > 2 + H 2 O \text{CH}</em>3CH<em>2CH</em>2–C≡CH \rightarrow \text{CH}<em>3CH</em>2CH<em>2\text{COOH}+\text{CO}</em>2+\text{H}_2\text{O} CH < / e m > 3 C H < e m > 2 C H < / e m > 2– C ≡ C H → CH < e m > 3 C H < / e m > 2 C H < e m > 2 COOH + CO < / e m > 2 + H 2 O Oxidation of Alcohols Oxidant hierarchy
• Weak: PCC, PDC, anhydrous CrO < e m > 3 / p y r i d i n e \text{CrO}<em>3/pyridine CrO < e m > 3/ p yr i d in e , Collins, MnO₂ (selective allylic/benzylic).
• Moderate: aqueous CrO < / e m > 3 \text{CrO}</em>3 CrO < / e m > 3 , Jones reagent, H < e m > 2 CrO < / e m > 4 \text{H}<em>2\text{CrO}</em>4 H < e m > 2 CrO < / e m > 4 .
• Strong: KMnO < e m > 4 / H + / Δ \text{KMnO}<em>4/H^+/\Delta KMnO < e m > 4/ H + /Δ , boiling K < / e m > 2 Cr < e m > 2 O < / e m > 7 / H + \text{K}</em>2\text{Cr}<em>2\text{O}</em>7/H^+ K < / e m > 2 Cr < e m > 2 O < / e m > 7/ H + . Outcome summary
• 1° alcohol
– Weak → aldehyde.
– Strong → carboxylic acid.
• 2° alcohol
– Any Cr(VI) or Mn(VII) reagent → ketone.
• 3° alcohol
– Resistant; only very vigorous oxidants effect cleavage → mixture of acids/ketones. Special transformations
• Copper at ≈ 573 K \approx 573\,\text{K} ≈ 573 K (dehydrogenation) ⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ aldehyde or ketone; if dehydration dominates, yields alkene.
• Oppenauer oxidation
– R < e m > 2 CHOH + (CH < / e m > 3 ) < e m > 2 CO → Al ( O t Bu ) < / e m > 3 R < e m > 2 C=O + (CH < / e m > 3 ) < e m > 2 CH–OH \text{R}<em>2\text{CHOH}+\text{(CH}</em>3)<em>2\text{CO} \xrightarrow[]{\text{Al}(\text{O}^t\text{Bu})</em>3} \text{R}<em>2\text{C=O}+\text{(CH}</em>3)<em>2\text{CH–OH} R < e m > 2 CHOH + (CH < / e m > 3 ) < e m > 2 CO Al ( O t Bu ) < / e m > 3 R < e m > 2 C=O + (CH < / e m > 3 ) < e m > 2 CH–OH
– Reagent base: aluminium tert-butoxide.
• Relative ease: \text{RCH}2\text{OH} > \text{R}2\text{CHOH} \gg \text{R} 3\text{COH}. MnO₂ (activated) — chemoselective for allylic & benzylic alcohols ⇒ corresponding carbonyl without affecting other functions. Carbonyl-Level Oxidations Aldehydes
• Readily oxidised to same-carbon-count acids by KMnO < e m > 4 / H + \text{KMnO}<em>4/H^+ KMnO < e m > 4/ H + , K < / e m > 2 Cr < e m > 2 O < / e m > 7 / H + \text{K}</em>2\text{Cr}<em>2\text{O}</em>7/H^+ K < / e m > 2 Cr < e m > 2 O < / e m > 7/ H + .
• Weak oxidants (Ag⁺, Cu²⁺ tests) also suffice. Ketones
• Oxidation only under harsh conditions; governed by Popoff’s rule—carbonyl stays with smaller alkyl fragment.
– Example: CH < e m > 3 COCH < / e m > 2 CH < e m > 3 → Δ KMnO < / e m > 4 / H + 2 CH < e m > 3 COOH \text{CH}<em>3\text{COCH}</em>2\text{CH}<em>3 \xrightarrow[\Delta]{\text{KMnO}</em>4/H^+} 2\,\text{CH}<em>3\text{COOH} CH < e m > 3 COCH < / e m > 2 CH < e m > 3 KMnO < / e m > 4/ H + Δ 2 CH < e m > 3 COOH
– CH < / e m > 3 COCH < e m > 2 CH < / e m > 2 CH < e m > 3 → CH < / e m > 3 COOH + CH < e m > 3 CH < / e m > 2 COOH \text{CH}</em>3\text{COCH}<em>2\text{CH}</em>2\text{CH}<em>3 \rightarrow \text{CH}</em>3\text{COOH}+\text{CH}<em>3\text{CH}</em>2\text{COOH} CH < / e m > 3 COCH < e m > 2 CH < / e m > 2 CH < e m > 3 → CH < / e m > 3 COOH + CH < e m > 3 CH < / e m > 2 COOH
• Complete oxidation of acetone: Me–C=O–Me → MeCOOH + CO < e m > 2 + H < / e m > 2 O \text{Me–C=O–Me} \rightarrow \text{MeCOOH}+\text{CO}<em>2+\text{H}</em>2\text{O} Me–C=O–Me → MeCOOH + CO < e m > 2 + H < / e m > 2 O . Baeyer–Villiger oxidation
• Ketone + peracid → ester; cyclic ketone → lactone.
– PhCOCH < e m > 3 → mCPBA PhCOOCH < / e m > 3 \text{PhCOCH}<em>3 \xrightarrow[]{\text{mCPBA}} \text{PhCOOCH}</em>3 PhCOCH < e m > 3 mCPBA PhCOOCH < / e m > 3 (67 %).
– Cyclohexanone → BF < e m > 3 H < / e m > 2 O 2 ε-Caprolactone \text{Cyclohexanone} \xrightarrow[\text{BF}<em>3]{\text{H}</em>2\text{O}_2} \text{ε-Caprolactone} Cyclohexanone H < / e m > 2 O 2 BF < e m > 3 ε-Caprolactone (62 %). SeO₂ (allylic oxidation / α-carbonyl oxidation)
• Converts – C H 2 – –CH_2– – C H 2 – next to >C=O → >C=O (forming 1,2-diketone or α-aldehyde). Diagnostic Oxidation Tests for Aldehydes Tollen’s (ammoniacal Ag + \text{Ag}^+ Ag + )
• RCHO + 2 [ Ag(NH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 2 ] + + 3 OH − → RCOO − + 2 Ag ↓ + 4 NH < e m > 3 + 2 H < / e m > 2 O \text{RCHO}+2[\text{Ag(NH}<em>3)</em>2]^++3\,\text{OH}^- \rightarrow \text{RCOO}^-+2\,\text{Ag}↓+4\,\text{NH}<em>3+2\,\text{H}</em>2\text{O} RCHO + 2 [ Ag(NH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 2 ] + + 3 OH − → RCOO − + 2 Ag ↓ + 4 NH < e m > 3 + 2 H < / e m > 2 O ⇒ silver mirror. Fehling’s (alkaline Cu²⁺–tartrate)
• RCHO + 2 Cu 2 + + 3 OH − → RCOO − + Cu < e m > 2 O ( red ) + 2 H < / e m > 2 O \text{RCHO}+2\,\text{Cu}^{2+}+3\,\text{OH}^- \rightarrow \text{RCOO}^-+\text{Cu}<em>2\text{O}(\text{red})+2\,\text{H}</em>2\text{O} RCHO + 2 Cu 2 + + 3 OH − → RCOO − + Cu < e m > 2 O ( red ) + 2 H < / e m > 2 O
• Benzaldehyde negative. Benedict’s (Cu²⁺–citrate) – same red Cu₂O precipitate. Schiff’s reagent (decolourised magenta p-rosaniline)
• Aldehyde restores pink; ketones no colour change. HgCl < e m > 2 \text{HgCl}<em>2 HgCl < e m > 2 test (Maquenne) – aldehyde reduces mercuric → mercurous Hg < / e m > 2 Cl 2 \text{Hg}</em>2\text{Cl}_2 Hg < / e m > 2 Cl 2 (white) or Hg° (grey).Oxidation of Vicinal Diols (Diol Cleavage) Periodic acid HIO < e m > 4 \text{HIO}<em>4 HIO < e m > 4 or NaIO < / e m > 4 / Pb(OAc) < e m > 4 \text{NaIO}</em>4/\text{Pb(OAc)}<em>4 NaIO < / e m > 4/ Pb(OAc) < e m > 4
• Forms cyclic periodate ester then cleaves C–C bond, giving carbonyl fragments.
• Requires syn –vicinal placement (cis in cyclic systems).
• General: R–CH(OH)–CH(OH)–R’ → HIO < / e m > 4 R–C=O + R’–C=O + HCOOH (if R or R’ = H) \text{R–CH(OH)–CH(OH)–R'} \xrightarrow[]{\text{HIO}</em>4} \text{R–C=O}+\text{R'–C=O}+\text{HCOOH (if R or R' = H)} R–CH(OH)–CH(OH)–R’ HIO < / e m > 4 R–C=O + R’–C=O + HCOOH (if R or R’ = H) .
• Trans-diols in rings are inert because ester cannot form.
• Also oxidises α-hydroxy carbonyls, α-dicarbonyls, α-hydroxy acids. Key Reagents Cheat-Sheet KMnO 4 \text{KMnO}_4 KMnO 4
• Cold, dilute, basic → syn-diol.
• Warm/acidic → oxidative cleavage.OsO < e m > 4 / NaHSO < / e m > 3 \text{OsO}<em>4/\text{NaHSO}</em>3 OsO < e m > 4/ NaHSO < / e m > 3 – gentle cis-diol.Peroxyacids – epoxide → trans-diol (after acid). CrO 3 \text{CrO}_3 CrO 3 families
• Jones (aq.), Collins (acetone), PCC (Cl⁻), PDC – tune selectivity for alcohols.MnO 2 \text{MnO}_2 MnO 2 (activated) – allylic/benzylic alcohol → carbonyl.SeO 2 \text{SeO}_2 SeO 2 – allylic CH oxidation or α-carbonyl oxidation.HIO 4 \text{HIO}_4 HIO 4 – vicinal diol cleavage.Peracids/H < e m > 2 O < / e m > 2 + Lewis acid \text{H}<em>2\text{O}</em>2+\text{Lewis acid} H < e m > 2 O < / e m > 2 + Lewis acid – Baeyer–Villiger. Comparative Reactivity & Conceptual Mnemonics Electron-rich alkenes oxidise faster (give diols/epoxides easier) because the oxidant is electrophilic. Order of oxidisability
\text{Allylic CH} > 3° CH > 2° CH > 1° CH > CH_4 (for KMnO₄ type reagents). In cleavage, remember:
• “Carboxylic acids hold onto the carbon that already had O.”
• Terminal C (with ≥2 H) often exits the molecule as CO 2 \text{CO}_2 CO 2 . Embedded Worked Examples (from transcript) 2 CH < e m > 4 + O < / e m > 2 → 2 CH 3 OH 2\,\text{CH}<em>4 + \text{O}</em>2 \rightarrow 2\,\text{CH}_3\text{OH} 2 CH < e m > 4 + O < / e m > 2 → 2 CH 3 OH (partial oxidation ratio 9 : 1 9:1 9 : 1 CH₄:O₂)CH < e m > 3 CH = CH–CH(OH)–CH < / e m > 2 CH < e m > 2 OH → step 1 K < / e m > 2 Cr < e m > 2 O < / e m > 7 / H + CH 3 CH = CH–C(O)OH + HOOC– … \text{CH}<em>3\text{CH}=\text{CH}–\text{CH(OH)}–\text{CH}</em>2\text{CH}<em>2\text{OH} \xrightarrow[\text{step }1]{\text{K}</em>2\text{Cr}<em>2\text{O}</em>7/H^+} \text{CH}_3\text{CH}=\text{CH}–\text{C(O)OH}+\text{HOOC}–\dots CH < e m > 3 CH = CH – CH(OH) – CH < / e m > 2 CH < e m > 2 OH K < / e m > 2 Cr < e m > 2 O < / e m > 7/ H + step 1 CH 3 CH = CH – C(O)OH + HOOC – … (cleavage shown in original problems)Oppenauer: given allylic alcohol → corresponding conjugated aldehyde. Ethical & Practical Asides Strong oxidants (Cr(VI), Mn(VII)) are carcinogenic & environmentally problematic; greener alternatives (IBX, TEMPO, electrochemical) increasingly preferred. Silver waste from Tollen’s must be retrieved; otherwise forms explosive silver nitride on drying. Quick-Reference Equations Syn dihydroxylation: >C=C< \;\xrightarrow[]{\text{KMnO}_4/\text{OH}^-} \; >C(OH)–C(OH)<. Epoxidation: >C=C< + \text{RCO}3\text{H} \rightarrow \text{epoxide}+\text{RCO} 2\text{H}. Aldehyde test (Tollen): RCHO + 2 [ Ag(NH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 2 ] + + 3 OH − → RCOO − + 2 Ag + 4 NH < e m > 3 + 2 H < / e m > 2 O \text{RCHO}+2[\text{Ag(NH}<em>3)</em>2]^+ +3\,\text{OH}^- \rightarrow \text{RCOO}^- +2\,\text{Ag}+4\,\text{NH}<em>3 +2\,\text{H}</em>2\text{O} RCHO + 2 [ Ag(NH < e m > 3 ) < / e m > 2 ] + + 3 OH − → RCOO − + 2 Ag + 4 NH < e m > 3 + 2 H < / e m > 2 O . Periodic acid cleavage: RCH(OH)–CH(OH)R’ + HIO 4 → RCHO + R’CHO + HCOOH \text{RCH(OH)}–\text{CH(OH)R'}+\text{HIO}_4 \rightarrow \text{RCHO}+\text{R'CHO}+\text{HCOOH} RCH(OH) – CH(OH)R’ + HIO 4 → RCHO + R’CHO + HCOOH (if one side is –CH(OH)).