7.4 selection and presentation of the news
Social construction of the news
different stories can be told, but a range of practical, ideological, cultural, economic and social factors mean certain stories are chosen and told in a certain way
Galtung and Ruge - news values. More likely to be published is they are…
Unexpected
About important/ well known people
‘Bad news’
Timely
Simple
Familiar
About elite countries
This has changed as there is a greater focus on celebrities, and it’s more important for stories to be visually interesting. Also must ensure that advertisers are not offended or alienated by any political or controversial messages
Practical constraints
tight deadlines
Limited budgets
Easily accessible
This has led to churnalism, reusing old information/ media (Davies). Found that 80% of stories in 2 newspapers were reused informatioN.
Agenda setting
where journalists and editors decide what is significant or not
Gatekeeping
Gans says editors are gatekeepers because they decide what is in the news and what isn’t, so they have access to information but withhold it from the audience
Evaluation of social construction of the news
there are news programmes that have a less strong editorial hand, such as ‘without comment’ where they publish photos without any comment. However journalists still choose which pictures to film
Marxists may argue that agenda setting and Gatekeeping practices are intended to transmit the ruling class ideology, rather than being to do with news values. Viewing these chooses as entirely political
Pluralists (Jones) found that the news does fairly reflect reality. Concludes there was a balanced discussion between news broadcasts
The media often targets the powerful and exposes corruption and abuse of power. However this may just be to manipulate the audience into believing the news is fair
Argued that citizen journalism reduces practical restrictions as access is much easier, as they can access photos and information from the public. However this may be more difficult for under-developed countries
Regulating the news
Uk press is regulated by IPSO which replaced PCC after the Leveson inquiry
The leveson inquiry found that journalists at the ‘news of the world’ (owned by Rupert Murdock) had been hacking the mobile phones of people connected with news stories, most were celebrities but one was a murder victim in which they checked her telephone messages. This lead to ISPO being the new regulatory body and for the body to be independent but backed up by legislation (not state regulated)
For state regulation
press abuses
Intrusive paparazzi and lack of privacy
Lack of accountability, whereas the BBC reflects public concerns
Independent of the government politically
Against state regulation
free press
Journalists can expose and challenge the powerful, including government
Self regulation works
State involvement leads to greater state control and censorship
Politicians would be able to push certain stories for their benefit
Even though there isn’t much state interference in the UK, newspapers will often support one particular government and have reasonable relationships with government ministers. Some individuals manage to get court orders ensuring the cannot be names in certain articles in relation to certain controversies (usually celebrities), known as super injunctions. However these stories are often widely reported in other countries anyway.