L7 (3): Intertemporal Consumption Choice – Two-Period Model Study Notes
Recap & Context
- Lecture continues the series on inter-temporal consumption choice.
- Builds on the previously studied one-period model, now expanded to two periods: “today” (period t) and “tomorrow” (period t′).
- Labor–leisure decisions are abstracted away; focus is solely on how a consumer allocates consumption across time.
- Reminder: Students should be able to re-derive all equations/graphs from first principles—no rote memorisation.
- Copyright notice from ANU reiterated at the start (Section 113P, Copyright Act 1968).
Intertemporal Budget Constraint (IBC) – Review
- Lifetime budget must equate the present value of consumption to the present value of disposable income.
- Canonical form (two-period):
c+1+rc′=(y−t)+1+r(y′−t′)
where
- c,c′ = consumption today / tomorrow
- y,y′ = income today / tomorrow
- t,t′ = taxes today / tomorrow
- r = real interest rate (assumed exogenous in the partial-equilibrium setup)
- Graphical representation:
- Horizontal axis: c (today).
- Vertical axis: c′ (tomorrow).
- Slope of IBC: −(1+r) (opportunity cost of consuming 1 extra unit today).
- Vertical intercept: c′=(1+r)(y−t)+(y′−t′) (consume nothing today).
- Horizontal intercept: c=(y−t)+1+r(y′−t′) (consume nothing tomorrow).
- Any bundle on the line is affordable; above is infeasible; below leaves unspent resources.
Preferences in a Two-Period Setting
- Assumed well-behaved: monotonic (more of either good raises utility) & strictly convex (diminishing MRS).
- Indifference curves:
- Downward-sloping (trade-off between c and c′).
- Convex toward the origin (captures preference for consumption smoothing).
- Higher indifference curves lie to the north-east, representing higher utility.
- Only difference from the static model: axes are now time-stamped consumption bundles rather than consumption vs. leisure.
Consumer Optimisation Problem
- Choose (c∗,c′∗) such that:
- Utility is maximised (highest attainable indifference curve).
- IBC holds (choice is affordable).
- Formally: max<em>c,c′ U(c,c′) s.t. c+1+rc′=PV</em>income.
- The word “and” emphasised: both optimality & feasibility must hold simultaneously.
Optimal Consumption & Savings Scenarios
- Graphically illustrated with three coloured examples:
- Saver (blue)
- Optimum lies left of endowment point (consume less today, more tomorrow).
- s^* > 0 where s=y−t−c.
- Neither Borrower nor Saver
- Optimum exactly at endowment point.
- s∗=0; consumes entire disposable income each period.
- Borrower (green)
- Optimum lies right/below the endowment.
- s^* < 0 (negative savings).
- Star (★) notation on the slide marks optimal saving level.
Comparative Statics: Shifts in Disposable Income
- Income today up (y−t↑) or income tomorrow up (y′−t′↑):
- IBC shifts outward (parallel).
- Both c∗ and c′∗ rise under normality of consumption.
- Permanent income change (both periods rise):
- Effect is reinforced; larger increases in both c and c′.
- Temporary income change (one period only):
- Rise in income today → smaller rise in c than the income increase; remainder saved.
- Mechanism = consumption smoothing (spread gains across periods).
Consumption Smoothing Explained
- Definition: Adjusting consumption less than one-for-one with temporary income fluctuations so as to stabilise utility over time.
- Outcome: \Delta c < \Delta (y - t) if increase is temporary.
- Biblical analogy: Joseph advising Pharaoh to store grain in good years for the famine years.
Effect of a Change in the Real Interest Rate (Exercise 2 Preview)
- Increase in r changes the intertemporal price of consumption, generating:
- Substitution effect
- Consumption today becomes more expensive relative to tomorrow ⇒ tend to consume less today, more tomorrow.
- Income effect
- For savers (lenders): Higher r makes them richer ⇒ could raise both c and c′.
- For borrowers: Higher r makes them poorer ⇒ could lower both.
- Net effect = substitution + income; sign depends on borrower vs. saver status.
- Full decomposition to be done in upcoming workshop.
Forthcoming Extensions
- Endogenise income streams: allow y,y′ to be choice variables or state-dependent.
- Endogenise r within a general equilibrium (capital market clears via demand & supply of savings).
- Use extended model for business cycle analysis and policy evaluation.
Ethical / Practical Implications
- Highlights prudence in personal finance: smooth temporary shocks; avoid over-reacting to windfalls.
- Underpins policy debates on consumption taxes, interest-rate policy, and social insurance (helps households smooth consumption).
Key Terms & Definitions
- Disposable income: y−t each period.
- Present value (PV): Current worth of future cash flows discounted by 1+r.
- Savings: s=y−t−c (positive ⇒ saving, negative ⇒ borrowing).
- Consumption smoothing: Choosing a stable consumption path despite volatile income.
- Substitution effect vs. Income effect: Standard decomposition when a relative price (here, 1+r) changes.
Connections to Previous Material
- Builds directly on static utility maximisation (one-period) and introduces time as an additional dimension.
- Retains the same logic of highest indifference curve subject to a budget constraint.
Numerical / Symbolic References from Lecture
- Slope of IBC: −(1+r).
- Optimality condition (first-order): MRSc,c′=1+r (although not explicitly derived, implied by tangency).
- Savings sign convention: s^* > 0 (saving), s∗=0 (neither), s^*<0 (borrowing).
Action Items for Students
- Practise drawing the IBC from scratch, labelling intercepts & slope.
- Work through textbook exercises on:
- Income shifts (temporary vs. permanent).
- Increase in the real interest rate—decompose effects for borrowers & savers.
- Prepare for the workshop: you may be asked to present your derivations.
- Stay up-to-date weekly; the course will shortly escalate to general-equilibrium & policy analysis.