L7 (3): Intertemporal Consumption Choice – Two-Period Model Study Notes

Recap & Context

  • Lecture continues the series on inter-temporal consumption choice.
  • Builds on the previously studied one-period model, now expanded to two periods: “today” (period tt) and “tomorrow” (period tt').
  • Labor–leisure decisions are abstracted away; focus is solely on how a consumer allocates consumption across time.
  • Reminder: Students should be able to re-derive all equations/graphs from first principles—no rote memorisation.
  • Copyright notice from ANU reiterated at the start (Section 113P, Copyright Act 1968).

Intertemporal Budget Constraint (IBC) – Review

  • Lifetime budget must equate the present value of consumption to the present value of disposable income.
  • Canonical form (two-period): c+c1+r=(yt)+(yt)1+rc + \frac{c'}{1+r} = (y - t) + \frac{(y' - t')}{1+r} where
    • c,cc, c' = consumption today / tomorrow
    • y,yy, y' = income today / tomorrow
    • t,tt, t' = taxes today / tomorrow
    • rr = real interest rate (assumed exogenous in the partial-equilibrium setup)
  • Graphical representation:
    • Horizontal axis: cc (today).
    • Vertical axis: cc' (tomorrow).
    • Slope of IBC: (1+r)-(1+r) (opportunity cost of consuming 1 extra unit today).
    • Vertical intercept: c=(1+r)(yt)+(yt)c' = (1+r)(y - t) + (y' - t') (consume nothing today).
    • Horizontal intercept: c=(yt)+(yt)1+rc = (y - t) + \frac{(y' - t')}{1+r} (consume nothing tomorrow).
  • Any bundle on the line is affordable; above is infeasible; below leaves unspent resources.

Preferences in a Two-Period Setting

  • Assumed well-behaved: monotonic (more of either good raises utility) & strictly convex (diminishing MRS).
  • Indifference curves:
    • Downward-sloping (trade-off between cc and cc').
    • Convex toward the origin (captures preference for consumption smoothing).
    • Higher indifference curves lie to the north-east, representing higher utility.
  • Only difference from the static model: axes are now time-stamped consumption bundles rather than consumption vs. leisure.

Consumer Optimisation Problem

  • Choose (c,c)(c^*, c'^*) such that:
    • Utility is maximised (highest attainable indifference curve).
    • IBC holds (choice is affordable).
  • Formally: max<em>c,c U(c,c) s.t. c+c1+r=PV</em>income\max<em>{c,c'}\ U(c,c')\ \text{s.t.}\ c + \frac{c'}{1+r}=PV</em>{income}.
  • The word “and” emphasised: both optimality & feasibility must hold simultaneously.

Optimal Consumption & Savings Scenarios

  • Graphically illustrated with three coloured examples:
    1. Saver (blue)
    • Optimum lies left of endowment point (consume less today, more tomorrow).
    • s^* > 0 where s=ytcs = y - t - c.
    1. Neither Borrower nor Saver
    • Optimum exactly at endowment point.
    • s=0s^* = 0; consumes entire disposable income each period.
    1. Borrower (green)
    • Optimum lies right/below the endowment.
    • s^* < 0 (negative savings).
  • Star (★) notation on the slide marks optimal saving level.

Comparative Statics: Shifts in Disposable Income

  • Income today up (yty - t \uparrow) or income tomorrow up (yty' - t' \uparrow):
    • IBC shifts outward (parallel).
    • Both cc^* and cc'^* rise under normality of consumption.
  • Permanent income change (both periods rise):
    • Effect is reinforced; larger increases in both cc and cc'.
  • Temporary income change (one period only):
    • Rise in income today → smaller rise in cc than the income increase; remainder saved.
    • Mechanism = consumption smoothing (spread gains across periods).

Consumption Smoothing Explained

  • Definition: Adjusting consumption less than one-for-one with temporary income fluctuations so as to stabilise utility over time.
  • Outcome: \Delta c < \Delta (y - t) if increase is temporary.
  • Biblical analogy: Joseph advising Pharaoh to store grain in good years for the famine years.

Effect of a Change in the Real Interest Rate (Exercise 2 Preview)

  • Increase in rr changes the intertemporal price of consumption, generating:
    1. Substitution effect
    • Consumption today becomes more expensive relative to tomorrow ⇒ tend to consume less today, more tomorrow.
    1. Income effect
    • For savers (lenders): Higher rr makes them richer ⇒ could raise both cc and cc'.
    • For borrowers: Higher rr makes them poorer ⇒ could lower both.
  • Net effect = substitution + income; sign depends on borrower vs. saver status.
  • Full decomposition to be done in upcoming workshop.

Forthcoming Extensions

  • Endogenise income streams: allow y,yy, y' to be choice variables or state-dependent.
  • Endogenise rr within a general equilibrium (capital market clears via demand & supply of savings).
  • Use extended model for business cycle analysis and policy evaluation.

Ethical / Practical Implications

  • Highlights prudence in personal finance: smooth temporary shocks; avoid over-reacting to windfalls.
  • Underpins policy debates on consumption taxes, interest-rate policy, and social insurance (helps households smooth consumption).

Key Terms & Definitions

  • Disposable income: yty - t each period.
  • Present value (PV): Current worth of future cash flows discounted by 1+r1+r.
  • Savings: s=ytcs = y - t - c (positive ⇒ saving, negative ⇒ borrowing).
  • Consumption smoothing: Choosing a stable consumption path despite volatile income.
  • Substitution effect vs. Income effect: Standard decomposition when a relative price (here, 1+r1+r) changes.

Connections to Previous Material

  • Builds directly on static utility maximisation (one-period) and introduces time as an additional dimension.
  • Retains the same logic of highest indifference curve subject to a budget constraint.

Numerical / Symbolic References from Lecture

  • Slope of IBC: (1+r)-(1+r).
  • Optimality condition (first-order): MRSc,c=1+rMRS_{c,c'} = 1+r (although not explicitly derived, implied by tangency).
  • Savings sign convention: s^* > 0 (saving), s=0s^* = 0 (neither), s^*<0 (borrowing).

Action Items for Students

  • Practise drawing the IBC from scratch, labelling intercepts & slope.
  • Work through textbook exercises on:
    1. Income shifts (temporary vs. permanent).
    2. Increase in the real interest rate—decompose effects for borrowers & savers.
  • Prepare for the workshop: you may be asked to present your derivations.
  • Stay up-to-date weekly; the course will shortly escalate to general-equilibrium & policy analysis.