Why does the US Lack National Health Insurance?

 

·       Windows of opportunity for healthcare reform, and opportunities and why/how they were squandered

o   Healthcare Reform 

§  Obamacare/ACA

§  Social Security Act

§  Affordable Care Act (ACA)

§  Medicare/Medicaid 

o   Why/how they were squandered 

·       Cooptation of the middle class (Rothman)

o   Role of the Blues 

§  1st private health insurance 

§  1. Protected income of doctors/hospitals

§  2. Could deliver affordable coverage to middle class to not undermine individual autonomy 

·       Rich had private, poor had public

·       Ethos of voluntarism (e.g., physicians’ sliding scales for payment) (Rothman)

o   People could pay as much as they wanted to 

o   More respect for doctors 

§  Bakesaled way out of cancer treatment 

§  ex) GoFundMe

o   Public responsibility linked to welfare system (serving poor!!)

·       Consequences of Medicare and Medicaid legislation for the chances of national health care reform (partial solutions); for the subsequent rise in costs in the 1970s

o   Medicare – national healthcare didn’t align w/ the fact that older Americans considered unique (more health issues, “deserving” since they worked their whole lives)

o   Medicaid – only targeted low income 

o   Subsequent Rise in costs in 1970s 

§  Private insurance industries took over as most powerful stakeholder 

·       Previous explanations for why national health reform hasn’t passed (American exceptionalism!) and Quadagno’s counterargument

o   American Exceptionalism – values & political culture that resumes responsibility of citizens beyond social 

§  Weak labor movements that consistently support market-based solutions

§  Political institutions in the way of policy creation 

o   Quadagno’s Counterargument

§  Why did we pass Social Security & Medicare if we are so unfriendly to people in need?

§  Political institutions doesn’t explain uniqueness of private + public 

§  Stakeholder Mobilization Theory – Healthcare financing constructed through struggles between reformers & powerful stakeholder groups mobilizing against national health insurance 

·       Stakeholder mobilization (Quadagno)

o   Stakeholders in the past, stakeholders today

§  Past

·       AMA – opposed 3rd party 

·       Labor Unions  – opposed national health insurance 

·       Private Insurance industry – most powerful 

§  Today

·       AMA – aligned w/ private insurance after GD

·       Labor Unions  – shifted opinions after Medicare due to costs of insuring elderly 

·       Private Insurance industry 

o   What strategies do stakeholders employ?

§  Lobbying, grassroots strategies, advertising, developing private solutions

·       Lobbying – person or organization attempts to influence decisions by government official or policy makers

·       Grassroots Strategies – ground-level protests, petition drives, letter writing campaigns 

·       Advertising – shape public opinion 

·       Private Solutions

o   The role of the AMA (American Medical Association)

§  Opposed 3rd party payers 

·       Americans should pay out of pocket

·       Didn’t want doctors to lose autonomy from private services

§  After GD, against national health insurance 

·       Didn’t want governmental control 

o   The role of labor unions

§  Wanted to preserve benefits of their members

§  Goals aligned w/ AMA 

§  Against national healthcare  

§  Shifted to support Medicare because their private plans for elderly not profitable

o   The role of the private health insurance industry

§  Took over as most powerful stakeholder in 1970s

·       Limited medical professional autonomy + labor union position changed 

§  The Blues 

o   Attempts at healthcare legislation in the US in the 20th century and their outcomes (e.g., Medicare/Medicaid, Health Care Security Acts of 1993)

§  Medicare/Medicaid – state and/or federally funded; improved health care access + outcomes 

§  Health Care Security Acts of 1993 – would manage competition between private insurers (multiplayer); failed because organized campaign by private health insurance industry 

o   Fear of socialism as a factor in the 1940s -1950s and beyond

§  Push for national health care sunk through anti-communist fears  

o   Fear of government involvement in healthcare (compare the AMA late 1940s campaign against socialized medicine and the more recent conservative attack on the ACA)

§  AMA campaign – campaigned against national health care due to anti-communist fears from government intervention 

§  Conservative Attack – Republican attack of ACA due to less trusting of federal government  

o   Belief in private solutions to the societal problems (e.g. employer-based private insurance)

§  Institutionalization of employer-based plans after AMA pushed against national health insurance