Key Concepts: Scapegoating, First Principle, Memetic Crisis, and Florence Study Abroad

Scapegoating and Binding

  • Scapegoating is a social mechanism to restore order by expelling or destroying a scapegoat; described with the term pharmakos as a way communities protect themselves.
  • Atonement = being made one again with the community; framed as the ultimate binding process. The phrase often heard: to be at one with others.
  • Memetic crisis: when there is no single unifying principle, different groups love different things, leading to endless conflict and social fragmentation. Examples: competing loves like freedom, money, health, technology.
  • Religion as binding: human beings are fundamentally social and require a binding principle to stay together. The first principle unifies what we love and governs how we live.
  • First principle = the bedrock order that determines what counts as right or true; when this is weak or chaotic, scapegoating becomes the norm.
  • Atonement and belonging: belonging is achieved through a shared binding principle; in sports or dorm life, breaches of belonging trigger collective responses to restore unity.
  • The problem with many modern societies: multiple competing unities make it hard to bind people together; no universal standard to adjudicate conflicts, leading to perpetual mimetic crisis.
  • In contrast, the Christian view introduced later in the discussion presents a different binding: God creates order (not chaos) and offers reconciliation, which can resolve crises without bloodshed.
  • The critique: if the first principle is chaos, violence and scapegoating are inevitable; if the first principle is order and sacredness of persons, bloodless binding and reconciliation become possible.
  • Key terms: scapegoating, pharmakos, first principle, memetic desire, atonement, religious animal.

Religious Binding and the First Principle

  • Humans are described as inherently religious animals because social life requires binding together through shared belief and practice.
  • Religion includes both beliefs and practices; you learn what people believe by observing what they do (ecclesial context, services, rites).
  • Etymology: religion derives from religio, meaning to bind again; social fragmentation is the opposite of binding.
  • First principle: the ultimate source by which a community orders itself; without a solid first principle, communities drift into competing aims and division.
  • Atonement’s literal sense: a condition of being “at one,” which rebinds a fractured community through reconciliation.

Historical and Mythic Examples of Scapegoating

  • Sumerians and surrounding ancient cultures:
    • Creation myths tied to chaos and order; the world and humans are formed in a ritualed order to serve the gods.
    • Some myths describe the world as born from the blood of a slain god; earth is portrayed with feminine imagery and rain as symbolic of life (sperm analogy).
    • Practices included ritual prostitution and child sacrifice to deities like Moloch/Baal to appease gods and secure rain and crops.
    • The king or priestly class often served as mediators between chaos and order through ritual actions.
    • These practices illustrate attempting to bind a community through violent ritual to secure fertility and rainfall; the underlying first principle was chaos and fear of drought.
  • This historical lens shows how ritual violence functions as a binding mechanism when reality is perceived as fundamentally chaotic.

Inversion through Christianity: A Path to Nonviolent Binding

  • The Christian narrative (via Genesis 1) reframes the world as created in order rather than chaos; God’s creative act establishes order and peace.
  • If the world is fundamentally ordered, the impulse to scapegoat can be redirected toward reconciliation and mediation rather than bloodshed.
  • The question becomes: is there a common good that can bind people without destroying those who differ? Is there a binding principle that endures through conflict?
  • This sets up the later argument in the text for a nonviolent binding mechanism through forgiveness, mercy, and shared belonging, rather than through purging the other.

The Florence Study Abroad Opportunity (Dean Zigmon)

  • Speaker: Doctor Brian Zigmon (the Dean) describing study abroad offerings in the College of Liberal Arts; emphasis on Florence trip with Professor Heil.
  • Duration and credits: 23 days; 6 credits; two courses (History and Art History) fulfilling the Global Encounters requirement; also contributes to Ethical Leaders program.
  • Schedule: Florence-based with travel to Rome, Siena, Pisa; day trips and structured excursions; clubs and guided activities with faculty leaders.
  • Living arrangements: apartments in central Florence (two-bedroom units); includes Wi-Fi and laundry; accommodation near a central church; meals self-catered with access to markets.
  • Cost and enrollment: tuition included in trip cost; airfare included; food not included; the total cost is effectively the tuition plus flight for the six credits; up to 26 seats on the bus, with ongoing outreach to fill seats (currently about 19 filled).
  • Benefits emphasized: immersive, faculty-led travel, direct exposure to global contexts, and practical engagement through the Global Encounters requirement; importance of experiential learning for Ethical Leaders.
  • How to participate: flyer with QR code links to a newsletter for information; contact details provided through the dean’s office; June 12 to July 6 timeline.
  • Light remarks: the dean’s playful self-introduction as a goat; emphasizes the personal and memorable nature of the program.

Quick Reference Terms

  • Scapegoating: mechanism to restore social order by expelling or harming a figure believed to carry collective guilt. ext{scapegoating}
  • Pharmakos: the ritual agent of purification by removal of a harmful element.
  • First principle: the bedrock value or idea that unifies a community and dictates actions.
  • Atonement: being made one again with the community; ext{Atonement} = ext{at one knit}
  • Memetic desire: desires shaped by what others love; conflict arises when there is no shared binding.
  • Religious animal: claim that humans are inherently religious due to our need to bind and belong.
  • Global Encounters: Mount program requirement tied to study abroad experiences.