Price Measures

Real Estate Price Measures

  • Prices quantify value; three key types:
    • Fair value – theoretical “average willingness to pay” derived from fundamentals (credit conditions, rents, etc.)
    • Market (ask) price – ex-ante price set by sellers, seen in listings
    • Transaction price – ex-post price actually paid in completed sales

Real Estate Price Indexes

Purpose:

  • Compare values across property types/regions

  • Track price changes over time

  • Inform buyers, investors, policy-makers, forecasting models

Main construction methods (each has pros/cons):

  1. Hedonic

  2. Repeat-Sales

  3. Stratification (Mix-Adjustment)

  4. SPAR (Sale-Price–Appraisal-Ratio)

Hedonic Method

  • Survey a sample of properties; score nn attributes (size, age, location, etc.)

  • Estimate regression: Pβ<em>0+β</em>1x<em>1++β</em>nxnP \sim \beta<em>0 + \beta</em>1 x<em>1 + \dots + \beta</em>n x_n

  • Predicted prices form the index; to compare periods:

    1. Collect new sample; estimate new β\beta’s

    2. Apply new β\beta’s to old sample → “new-old” prices

    3. Index = ratio of new vs. new-old prices

  • Strengths: captures quality differences, predictive.

  • Limits: relies on representative survey; fixed old sample may mis-represent current preferences.

Repeat-Sales Method

  • Observe two (or more) sales of the same dwelling; model log price change:
    ln(P<em>t+τP</em>t)β<em>0+β</em>iD<em>i\ln\left(\frac{P<em>{t+\tau}}{P</em>t}\right) \sim \beta<em>0 + \sum \beta</em>i D<em>i where D</em>iD</em>i are time dummies (−1 first sale, +1 second sale).

  • Advantages: uses actual transactions; no survey needed.

  • Limits: requires large matched-sale data; only descriptive of past changes, no quality attributes.

Stratification Method

  • Group dwellings into strata (bins) by attributes (e.g. size >100 m², district X, age >5 yrs).

  • Compute mean/median price per stratum for two periods.

  • Apply weights (share of transaction value or housing stock) → two weighted prices.

  • Index = ratio of weighted prices.

  • Pros: simple, avoids surveys.

  • Cons: attribute/boundary choice can be arbitrary; weight choice affects results.

SPAR Method

  • Need sale price and independent appraisal for each dwelling.

  • For period tt: SPAR<em>t=mean(P</em>salePappraisal)\text{SPAR}<em>t = \text{mean}\left(\tfrac{P</em>{sale}}{P_{appraisal}}\right)

  • Index between periods t<em>1t<em>1 and t</em>2t</em>2: SPAR<em>t</em>2SPAR<em>t</em>1\tfrac{\text{SPAR}<em>{t</em>2}}{\text{SPAR}<em>{t</em>1}}.

  • Pros: no matched sales or attribute lists.

  • Cons: requires timely, unbiased appraisals (often scarce or outdated).