Price Measures
Real Estate Price Measures
Prices quantify value; three key types:
• Fair value – theoretical “average willingness to pay” derived from fundamentals (credit conditions, rents, etc.)
• Market (ask) price – ex-ante price set by sellers, seen in listings
• Transaction price – ex-post price actually paid in completed sales
Real Estate Price Indexes
Purpose:
Compare values across property types/regions
Track price changes over time
Inform buyers, investors, policy-makers, forecasting models
Main construction methods (each has pros/cons):
Hedonic
Repeat-Sales
Stratification (Mix-Adjustment)
SPAR (Sale-Price–Appraisal-Ratio)
Hedonic Method
Survey a sample of properties; score attributes (size, age, location, etc.)
Estimate regression:
Predicted prices form the index; to compare periods:
Collect new sample; estimate new ’s
Apply new ’s to old sample → “new-old” prices
Index = ratio of new vs. new-old prices
Strengths: captures quality differences, predictive.
Limits: relies on representative survey; fixed old sample may mis-represent current preferences.
Repeat-Sales Method
Observe two (or more) sales of the same dwelling; model log price change:
where are time dummies (−1 first sale, +1 second sale).Advantages: uses actual transactions; no survey needed.
Limits: requires large matched-sale data; only descriptive of past changes, no quality attributes.
Stratification Method
Group dwellings into strata (bins) by attributes (e.g. size >100 m², district X, age >5 yrs).
Compute mean/median price per stratum for two periods.
Apply weights (share of transaction value or housing stock) → two weighted prices.
Index = ratio of weighted prices.
Pros: simple, avoids surveys.
Cons: attribute/boundary choice can be arbitrary; weight choice affects results.
SPAR Method
Need sale price and independent appraisal for each dwelling.
For period :
Index between periods and : .
Pros: no matched sales or attribute lists.
Cons: requires timely, unbiased appraisals (often scarce or outdated).