Article 1
Abstract
Objectives:
Provide a step-by-step approach for analyzing costs associated with medication therapy management (MTM) services.
Describe the use of a free online software application for cost determination in MTM delivery.
Practice description:
The process outlined applies to community pharmacies and consultant pharmacists operating in non-pharmacy settings.
Practice innovation:
Introduction of the PharmAccount Service Cost Calculator:
An Internet-based application conducting comprehensive cost analysis of specialized pharmacy services.
Gathers information through a guided online interview.
Allocates both indirect and overhead costs automatically, producing an itemized cost report for service delivery.
Results:
The calculator can analyze any specialized pharmacy service.
Supports sensitivity analysis for evaluating the effect of alternative scenarios on service costs.
Useful in designing and planning new pharmacy services.
Conclusion:
Understanding cost implications is essential for sustainable business models in pharmacy services.
Keywords
Medication therapy management, cost analysis, Internet, software.
Learning Objectives
At the end of the activity, pharmacists will be able to:
Describe major operating costs of delivering MTM services.
Classify operating costs as fixed or variable and explain their importance in management decisions.
Explain how service volume impacts per-encounter fixed costs in MTM delivery.
Accurately calculate the cost of delivering MTM services to patients.
Disclosure
PharmAccount is operated by MENTORx in Phoenix, AZ.
Dr. Rupp is the creator of PharmAccount and holds a managerial position at MENTORx.
No conflicts of interest reported by APhA’s editorial staff regarding products/services mentioned.
Accreditation Information
Provider: American Pharmacists Association.
Target Audience: Pharmacists.
Release Date: April 15, 2011.
Expiration Date: April 15, 2012.
ACPE Number: 202-000-11-111-H04-P.
CPE Credit Hours: 1.0 (0.1 CEUs).
ACPE Activity Type: Knowledge-based, Learning Level 1.
Metaphorical Analysis of Pharmacy Practice Evolution
Comparison of pharmacy’s transition to clinical services with the biblical journey of the Israelites.
Encouragement to establish sustainable business models for MTM services, similar to commandments for guidance.
Importance of creating comprehensive business models, including objectives, policies, and billing strategies for MTM services.
Cost Implications of MTM Services
Knowledge of service costs is crucial for effective pricing and decision-making.
McDonough et al.'s retrospective analysis:
Included direct fixed/variable costs, indirect costs, and sensitivity analysis for financial sustainability.
Principles of Service Cost Analysis
Cost of MTM service:
Defined as the operating costs incurred to deliver one unit to a patient.
Calculated as the sum of direct and indirect costs associated with the service.
Important costs to account for:
Personnel costs: Salary, wages, and benefits.
Direct costs: Includes education or training, marketing, materials, and equipment.
Overhead costs: Allocated fairly to service delivery.
Nature of Costs
Operating Costs
Divided into two major categories:
Direct Costs:
Costs traceable directly to the service, which would not be incurred if the service were not performed.
Subclassified into fixed and variable direct costs.
Variable costs vary in proportion to service volume (example: prescription vials).
Fixed costs do not change based on service volume (example: personnel costs).
Indirect Costs:
Costs incurred regardless of whether the service is provided.
Allocated based on reasonable criteria such as space occupied or share of total sales.
Importance of Cost Distinction
Critical for pricing and management strategies:
Understanding direct and indirect costs helps in breakeven and contribution margin analyses.
Breakeven Analysis
Evaluates whether a given price covers all costs:
Total Cost = Variable Costs + Fixed Costs.
Must determine volume to reach profit at specific pricing.
Contribution Margin Concept
Calculated as sales revenue minus variable costs.
Positive contribution indicates that service can cover fixed costs and potentially generate profit.
Example Analysis: Medi-Max Service
Medi-Max program targets medication adherence:
Delivery involves a sequence of consultations (average 30 minutes).
Personnel analysis in cost calculating was essential:
Includes preparation and follow-up time.
Calculation of personnel time and cost for ABC Pharmacy:
Clerk (5 minutes, $8/hr): $0.67.
Technician (10 minutes, $13.50/hr): $2.25.
Pharmacist (15 minutes, $65/hr): $16.25.
Total personnel costs: $19.17 per encounter.
Material and Supply Costs
Identified costs like medication schedulers ($4.50 each).
Total materials and supplies for one encounter of Medi-Max: $6.25.
Equipment Costs
Laptop costing $1,250 depreciated to calculate per-use cost.
Amortization strategies discussed for capital expenses.
Total annual depreciation = $200, impacting encounter costs based on service volume.
Additional Direct Fixed Costs
Costs such as staff training and promotional activities included.
Total nonsalary direct fixed costs calculated at $800 allocated across service encounters yielding additional cost per encounter.
Overhead Costs Allocation
Indirect costs allocated based on space used during operations.
Total overhead allocation examples included utility and rental costs.
Cost Reporting
Analyzed total average cost (including overhead, direct, and personnel costs):
For Medi-Max, total of $35.52 per encounter established.
Financial Implications & Pricing Strategy
Discussion of the relationship between fixed and variable costs in price setting.
Breakeven analysis illustrated pricing opportunities at $50 per encounter indicating 43 encounters required to breakeven.
Conclusion
Emphasis on the critical need for accurate cost analysis for developing sustainable MTM services.
PharmAccount online tool highlighted as a significant aid in this regard.
References
Cited articles, authors, and their respective contributions to the pharmacy practice framework and MTM service viability.